RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      부정적 언론보도가 기업에 대한 소비자의 태도에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856440

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This research examined the impact of negative publicity associated with a firm or an industry on consumer`s attitude toward the firm and its competition. This research also evaluated the effectiveness of alternative coping advertising strategies against such negative publicity. Most previous research investigating the effects of negative publicity has been concerned about the negative publicity associated with a certain firm`s products/services. In this research, however, we also investigated the effects of negative publicity associated with an industry or the target firm`s competition. Three experiments were conducted: In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that consumers` attitudes toward the target firm were more unfavorable when they were exposed to the negative publicity related to the firm’s social responsibility (corporate social responsibility; CSR) than when they were exposed to the one related to the firm`s ability(corporate ability; CA). We also found that highly typical firm within the industry is more heavily damaged than an atypical firm by the same kind of negative publicity. In the second experiment, the effects of negative publicity associated with an industry in general were examined. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that a typical firm within the industry was more heavily damaged by strongly negative publicity than an atypical firm whereas there was no significant difference between a typical firm and an atypical firm when the negative publicity was weak in intensity. In Experiment 3, we demonstrated the moderating effects of the target firm`s typicality and the type of the coping advertising strategy when the negative publicity associated with the competition affected consumer`s attitudes toward the target firm. When there was a negative publicity associated with a highly typical competition, the atypical target frim benefited from the negative publicity associated with the competition. However, the highly typical target from was not able to benefited from the negative publicity associated with the atypical competition due to its association with the atypical firm. It was also demonstrated that CA related advertising was more effective than CSR related advertising when there was a CA related negative publicity. However, there was no difference in effectiveness between CA related advertising and CSR related advertising when the negative publicity was CSR related.
      번역하기

      This research examined the impact of negative publicity associated with a firm or an industry on consumer`s attitude toward the firm and its competition. This research also evaluated the effectiveness of alternative coping advertising strategies again...

      This research examined the impact of negative publicity associated with a firm or an industry on consumer`s attitude toward the firm and its competition. This research also evaluated the effectiveness of alternative coping advertising strategies against such negative publicity. Most previous research investigating the effects of negative publicity has been concerned about the negative publicity associated with a certain firm`s products/services. In this research, however, we also investigated the effects of negative publicity associated with an industry or the target firm`s competition. Three experiments were conducted: In Experiment 1, we demonstrated that consumers` attitudes toward the target firm were more unfavorable when they were exposed to the negative publicity related to the firm’s social responsibility (corporate social responsibility; CSR) than when they were exposed to the one related to the firm`s ability(corporate ability; CA). We also found that highly typical firm within the industry is more heavily damaged than an atypical firm by the same kind of negative publicity. In the second experiment, the effects of negative publicity associated with an industry in general were examined. The results of Experiment 2 revealed that a typical firm within the industry was more heavily damaged by strongly negative publicity than an atypical firm whereas there was no significant difference between a typical firm and an atypical firm when the negative publicity was weak in intensity. In Experiment 3, we demonstrated the moderating effects of the target firm`s typicality and the type of the coping advertising strategy when the negative publicity associated with the competition affected consumer`s attitudes toward the target firm. When there was a negative publicity associated with a highly typical competition, the atypical target frim benefited from the negative publicity associated with the competition. However, the highly typical target from was not able to benefited from the negative publicity associated with the atypical competition due to its association with the atypical firm. It was also demonstrated that CA related advertising was more effective than CSR related advertising when there was a CA related negative publicity. However, there was no difference in effectiveness between CA related advertising and CSR related advertising when the negative publicity was CSR related.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 하영원, "“소비자 의사결정-정보처리적 접근을 중심으로,”" 11 (11): 1-38, 2000

      1 하영원, "“소비자 의사결정-정보처리적 접근을 중심으로,”" 11 (11): 1-38, 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼