RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      국내개발 군용항공기 MIL-HDBK-516C의 CS&S 안전필수소프트웨어 감항인증 연구 = Study on the CS&S Safety Critical Software Airworthiness Certification of Domestic Developed Military Aircraft MIL-HDBK-516C

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16836532

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Along with the exponential development of the information communication technology, increasing number of advanced aircraft‘s including F-35 are adopting software.
      Main function of systems, ranging from flight control, mission, and weapon management to aviation, communication, sensor and engine are all controlled by software.
      As the integrity of software is directly related with the safety, compliance to the verified development process and military standard is strictly required from the planning stage.
      If there's an issue with aircraft software, it might lead to a loss of both aircraft and life.
      Therefore securing safety of software is significant.
      Thus, the SCF(safety critical function) related software which are adopted on military aircraft like fighters to assure safety, is designated as SSE(safety support element), and are applied to more stringent development process.
      Therefore, it is essential to clearly identify software's safety support element at the early stage of aircraft development, and this is critical part in airworthiness certification.
      The standard for airworthiness certification of domestically developed military aircraft software is DAPA's Airworthiness Certification Standard Part I, which is drafted based on US's MIL-HDBK-516C.
      However, there are unclear part as the introduction of standards was relatively recent, and the specific identification standard is not standardized yet.
      Hence, lack of past cases is becoming an issue during airworthiness certification process.
      Following paper researched analysis model of aircraft-adopted software's safety critical function through an analysis of US Airworthiness Circular AC-17-01.
      Thus, based on the relevant studies, the paper verified the suitability of the analysis model by adopting it to an actual development project of a military aircraft system.
      The paper produced the certifying evidence that proves airworthiness and developed airworthiness certification methodology of aircraft‘s that will be developed in future.
      번역하기

      Along with the exponential development of the information communication technology, increasing number of advanced aircraft‘s including F-35 are adopting software. Main function of systems, ranging from flight control, mission, and weapon management...

      Along with the exponential development of the information communication technology, increasing number of advanced aircraft‘s including F-35 are adopting software.
      Main function of systems, ranging from flight control, mission, and weapon management to aviation, communication, sensor and engine are all controlled by software.
      As the integrity of software is directly related with the safety, compliance to the verified development process and military standard is strictly required from the planning stage.
      If there's an issue with aircraft software, it might lead to a loss of both aircraft and life.
      Therefore securing safety of software is significant.
      Thus, the SCF(safety critical function) related software which are adopted on military aircraft like fighters to assure safety, is designated as SSE(safety support element), and are applied to more stringent development process.
      Therefore, it is essential to clearly identify software's safety support element at the early stage of aircraft development, and this is critical part in airworthiness certification.
      The standard for airworthiness certification of domestically developed military aircraft software is DAPA's Airworthiness Certification Standard Part I, which is drafted based on US's MIL-HDBK-516C.
      However, there are unclear part as the introduction of standards was relatively recent, and the specific identification standard is not standardized yet.
      Hence, lack of past cases is becoming an issue during airworthiness certification process.
      Following paper researched analysis model of aircraft-adopted software's safety critical function through an analysis of US Airworthiness Circular AC-17-01.
      Thus, based on the relevant studies, the paper verified the suitability of the analysis model by adopting it to an actual development project of a military aircraft system.
      The paper produced the certifying evidence that proves airworthiness and developed airworthiness certification methodology of aircraft‘s that will be developed in future.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구배경 1
      • 2. 논문의 구성 4
      • II. CS&S 감항인증 개요 5
      • 1. 군용항공기의 항공 소프트웨어 개발 프로세스 5
      • I. 서 론 1
      • 1. 연구배경 1
      • 2. 논문의 구성 4
      • II. CS&S 감항인증 개요 5
      • 1. 군용항공기의 항공 소프트웨어 개발 프로세스 5
      • 2. 방위사업청 무기체계 소프트웨어 개발 및 관리 매뉴얼 11
      • 3. 민·군 감항인증의 역사 및 표준감항인증기준(MIL-HDBK-516C) 15
      • 4. CS&S (컴퓨터시스템과 소프트웨어) 24
      • 5. 미 공군 감항성 회람 AC-17-01 31
      • 6. RTCA DO-178 37
      • 7. RTCA DO-254 40
      • 8. MIL-HDBK-516C CS&S 충족을 위한 시스템안전 프로세스 43
      • Ⅲ. MIL-HDBK-516C CS&S 감항인증 49
      • 1. 국내 개발항공기에 대한 MIL-HDBK-516C CS&S 적용시 문제점 고찰 49
      • 2. MIL-HDBK-516C CS&S의 안전지원요소 개념 및 기준 분석 51
      • 3. 미 공군 감항성 회람(AC-17-01) 분석 54
      • Ⅳ. MIL-HDBK-516C CS&S SSE 식별 56
      • 1. 안전지원요소 식별을 위한 상세 기준 및 Worksheet 개발 56
      • 2. 분석 모델을 이용한 안전지원요소 식별 과정 62
      • 1) 안전필수기능의 분석 단계 62
      • 2) 안전필수기능경로분석 단계 66
      • 3) 안전필수기능스레드분석 Worksheet 분석 단계 73
      • Ⅴ. 안전지원요소 식별방법에 대한 타당성검증 75
      • 1. 안전지원요소 식별 방법에 대한 실제 검증 75
      • 2. 감항인증을 위한 입증 결과 75
      • Ⅵ. 결론 82
      • 1. 연구결과요약 82
      • 2. 연구의 한계와 추후 연구를 위한 시사점 83
      • 참고문헌 84
      • 부 록 89
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼