인적자원개발 관점에서의 미국 대학교육 Tenure 제도에 대한 고찰 = A Review on the Tenure System of USA Universities in Terms of Human Resource Development

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the environments surrounding universities have currently been gone through dramatical changes, tenure system is in the face of the most critical threat ever. The tenure system in Korean universities is also being attacked by the multi-year contract system and annual salary system, and the system has been abolished by Prime Minister Thatcher in England. In this article, the purpose was to review problems of the tenure systems initially established to protect the academic freedom and complementary systems developed to fix the problems from the perspective of human resource development, and finally drive implications from the review for the tenure system in Korean universities. In order for the purpose, prior articles related to the tenure systems were analyzed, identifying the concepts of academic freedom and tenure system, current trends of the tenure system in the USA universities, and problems and complementary systems. From the analysis, five problems and three complementary systems were identified. The problems included 1) outdated and non-useful system, 2) low productivity, 3) less flexible and economical system, 4) unclear and biased criteria, 5) no protection for the non-tenure. The complementary systems were multi-year contracts, monetary incentives, and post tenure review. Based on the analysis of the problems and complementary systems in terms of human resource development, the tenure system sis essential for the individual growth and professional development. The systems was recognized as a powerful incentives for the professors in tenure track and even those who pursue their careers in teaching at the university level. Thus, the system must be implemented for the better quality of education at university.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한국교육개발원, "한국교육통계"

2 김유정, "정관외 규정된 비정년트랙 전임교원 규정은 위법"

3 노종희, "인적자원개발 관점에서의 교원체제개발 구축" 19 (19): 1-19, 2001

4 정문종, "성과관리시스템으로서 대학교수 연봉제: 한국대학들의 도입 타당성을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 14 (14): 151-178, 2005

5 김종서, "비정년트랙 교원 제도 비판" 민주주의법학연구회 29 (29): 417-444, 2005

6 박남기, "대학별 교수업적평가 현황 분석 및 교수업적 평가 모형 개발" 교육인적자원부 2006

7 이준형, "대학교원의 정년보장: 절차적 비교" 11 (11): 239-257, 2000

8 유기홍, "대학교원 실태 조사 분석, In 2005년 국정감사 정책 자료집" 2005

9 김종서, "다시 한번 교수계약제에 대하여" 민주주의법학연구회 21 : 2-86, 2002

10 최경옥, "敎授의 再任用審査와 私的自治 ― 비정년트랙교수를 중심으로 ―" 한국헌법학회 13 (13): 347-405, 2007

11 김유정, "“정년트랙과 다르지 않다” … 실질적 ‘신분안정’ 필요"

12 Wood, M., "When Post-Tenure Review Policy and Practice Diverge : Making the Case for Congruence" 77 (77): 561-588, 2006

13 Trower, C., "What is the current policy?, In The questions of Tenure" Harvard University Press 32-68, 2002

14 Switkes, E., "University of California peer review system and post-tenure evaluation" 24 (24): 39-48, 1999

15 AAUP, "Trends in Faculty Status, 1975-2005"

16 Chait, R., "The questions of Tenure" Harvard University Press 2002

17 Olswang, S., "The Future of Tenure" 35 (35): 36-37, 2003

18 Allen, H. L., "Tenure: Why faculty, and the nation, need it. Thought and Action"

19 Premeaux, S. R., "Tenure's Impact : Male versus Female Viewpoints" 50 (50): 154-157, 2002

20 Huer, J., "Tenure for Socrates : A study in the betrayal of the American professor" Bergin & Garvey 1991

21 Tierney, W., "Tenure and academc freedom in the academy: Historical parameters and hew challenges, In Tenure in the Sacred Grove" SUNY press 2002

22 Caison, A. L., "Tenure Trends in Public, Four-Year Colleges and Universities" 31 (31): 15-25, 2002

23 Trower C., "Tenure Snapshot" American Association for Higher Education 1996

24 Patton, A., "Tenure Issues Task Force Report"

25 Lee, J., "Tenure" 7 (7): 2001

26 Immerwahr, J., "Taking responsibility: Leaders' expectations of higher education" National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education 1999

27 Perna, L. W., "Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: The contribution of family ties" 46 (46): 277-307, 2005

28 Leslie, D., "Redefining tenure: Tradition versus the new political economy of higher education" 41 : 651-679, 1998

29 Licata, C. M., "Post-tenure review : national trends, questions and concerns" 24 (24): 5-15, 1999

30 AAUP, "Post-Tenure Review: An AAUP Response"

31 Aper, J. P., "Post-Tenure Review at Graduate Institutions in the United States: Recommendations and Reality" 74 (74): 241-260, 2003

32 Premeaux, S. R., "Perspectives on Tenure : Tenured Versus Nontenured Tenure-Track Faculty" 77 (77): 335-339, 2002

33 Diamantes, T., "Open Records Laws and the Tenure and Promotion Process" 32 (32): 196-, 2005

34 Austin, A., "Making tenure viable : Listening to early career faculty" 41 : 736-754, 1998

35 Dimidjian, V. J., "Lessons From a Five-Year Diet of Tenure Lite" Thought & Action 2002

36 Chemerinsky, E., "Is Tenure necessary to protect academic freeedom?" 41 : 638-651, 1998

37 Poskanzer, S., "Higher education law: The faculty" Johns Hopkins University Press 2002

38 "Fall 2002"

39 AASCU, "Faculty Trends and Issues" 3 (3): 2006

40 Balogun, J., "Emerging Trends on Tenure Policies and Practices in Nursing and Allied Health Education" 35 (35): 134-141, 2006

41 O'Meara, K., "Beliefs about Post-Tenure Review: The Influence of Autonomy, Collegiality, Career Stage, and Institutional Context" 75 (75): 178-202, 2004

42 Ovington, J., "An Analysis of Prevailing Myths Regarding Tenure and Promotion" 123 (123): 635-637, 2003

43 American Federation of Teachers, "Academic freedom statement in the 21th-century college and university"

44 De George, R., "Academic freedom and tenure: Ethical issues" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers INC 1997

45 McGee, R., "Academic Tenure: An econonic critique, In Academic freedom and tenure: Ethical issues" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers INC 156-175, 1997

46 Fossey, R., "Academic Freedom and Tenure" 125 : 51-63, 2004

47 Mallon, W., "Abolishing and instituting tenure: Four case studies of change in faculty employment policies" Harvard Graduate School of Education 2000

48 Antony, J. S., "A comparative analysis of tenure and faculty productivity: Moving beyond traditional approaches" 1998

49 AAUP, "1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure"