RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Recovering Jesus’ Honor: Luke’s and Justin Martyr’s Apologetic Strategies on Jesus’ Crucifixion in Luke-Acts and the First Apology

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105947776

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In the Greco-Roman world, the concept of honor and shame was the pivotal social and cultural code by which every person was valued and recognized. In the honor and shame society, crucifixion was the most dishonorable and scandalous state execution which would utterly destroy one’s honor. Thus, early Christian apologists had to deal with Jesus’ death by crucifixion. In this paper, I explore how two Christian apologists, Luke and Justin Martyr, who recognized the problem of Jesus’ crucifixion, deal with such a problem to defend Christianity and to persuade their audiences/readers in their works, the Luke-Acts and the First Apology.
      By comparing their understandings and interpretations on Jesus’ crucifixion described in their works, I argue that both Luke and Justin employ similar apologetic strategies in order to restore and elevate Jesus’ honor. I present three apologetic and rhetorical strategies that Luke and Justin take. Firstly, they identify Jesus’ crucifixion as the divine plan. Secondly, they make a connection between the suffering and death of Jesus and those of the Greco-Roman figures. And Thirdly, they emphasize Jesus’ role as moral source and Jesus as model of moral excellence. With some differences in detail, Luke and Justin make an almost identical approaches to Jesus’ crucifixion in order to defend Jesus’ disgraceful death and to prop up Jesus’ honor.
      번역하기

      In the Greco-Roman world, the concept of honor and shame was the pivotal social and cultural code by which every person was valued and recognized. In the honor and shame society, crucifixion was the most dishonorable and scandalous state execution whi...

      In the Greco-Roman world, the concept of honor and shame was the pivotal social and cultural code by which every person was valued and recognized. In the honor and shame society, crucifixion was the most dishonorable and scandalous state execution which would utterly destroy one’s honor. Thus, early Christian apologists had to deal with Jesus’ death by crucifixion. In this paper, I explore how two Christian apologists, Luke and Justin Martyr, who recognized the problem of Jesus’ crucifixion, deal with such a problem to defend Christianity and to persuade their audiences/readers in their works, the Luke-Acts and the First Apology.
      By comparing their understandings and interpretations on Jesus’ crucifixion described in their works, I argue that both Luke and Justin employ similar apologetic strategies in order to restore and elevate Jesus’ honor. I present three apologetic and rhetorical strategies that Luke and Justin take. Firstly, they identify Jesus’ crucifixion as the divine plan. Secondly, they make a connection between the suffering and death of Jesus and those of the Greco-Roman figures. And Thirdly, they emphasize Jesus’ role as moral source and Jesus as model of moral excellence. With some differences in detail, Luke and Justin make an almost identical approaches to Jesus’ crucifixion in order to defend Jesus’ disgraceful death and to prop up Jesus’ honor.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 O’Neill, J. C., "The Theology of Acts in Its Historical Setting" SPCK 1970

      2 Skarsaune, Oskar, "The Proof from Prophecy: A Study in Justin Martyr’s Proof-Text Tradition: Text-Type, Provenance, Theological Profile" E. J. Brill 1987

      3 Malina, Bruce J., "The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology" John Knox 1981

      4 Mellor, Ronald, "The Historians of Ancient Rome" Routledge 1998

      5 Valantasis, Richard, "The Gospels and Christian Life in History and Practice" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2009

      6 Pitt-Rivers, Julian Alfred, "The Fate of Shechem: Or, The Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean" Cambridge University Press 1977

      7 Malina, Bruce J., "Social World of Luke-Acts" Hendrickson 25-65, 1991

      8 Wendel, Susan, "Scriptural Interpretation and Community Self-Definition in Luke-Acts and the Writings of Justin Martyr" Brill 2011

      9 White, L. Michael, "Scripting Jesus: The Gospels in Rewrite" HarperOne 2010

      10 Hellerman, Joseph H., "Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum" Cambridge University Press 2005

      1 O’Neill, J. C., "The Theology of Acts in Its Historical Setting" SPCK 1970

      2 Skarsaune, Oskar, "The Proof from Prophecy: A Study in Justin Martyr’s Proof-Text Tradition: Text-Type, Provenance, Theological Profile" E. J. Brill 1987

      3 Malina, Bruce J., "The New Testament World: Insights from Cultural Anthropology" John Knox 1981

      4 Mellor, Ronald, "The Historians of Ancient Rome" Routledge 1998

      5 Valantasis, Richard, "The Gospels and Christian Life in History and Practice" Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2009

      6 Pitt-Rivers, Julian Alfred, "The Fate of Shechem: Or, The Politics of Sex: Essays in the Anthropology of the Mediterranean" Cambridge University Press 1977

      7 Malina, Bruce J., "Social World of Luke-Acts" Hendrickson 25-65, 1991

      8 Wendel, Susan, "Scriptural Interpretation and Community Self-Definition in Luke-Acts and the Writings of Justin Martyr" Brill 2011

      9 White, L. Michael, "Scripting Jesus: The Gospels in Rewrite" HarperOne 2010

      10 Hellerman, Joseph H., "Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum" Cambridge University Press 2005

      11 Hyldahl, Niels, "Philosophie und Christentum. Eine Interpretation der Einleitung zum Dialog Justins" Munksgaard 1966

      12 Tacitus, Cornelius, "Oxford World’s Classics" Oxford University Press 2008

      13 Chadwick, Henry, "Origen : Contra Celsum" Cambridge University Press 1953

      14 Gardner, Gregg, "Jewish Leadership and Hellenistic Civic Benefaction in the Second Century BCE" 126 (126): 327-343,

      15 Neyrey, Jerome H., "Honor and Shame in the Gospel of Matthew" Westminster John Knox 1998

      16 Garnsey, Peter, "Food and Society in Classical Antiquity. Key Themes in Ancient History" Cambridge University Press 1999

      17 Garnsey, Peter, "Famine and Food Supply in the Graeco-Roman World: Responses to Risk and Crisis" Cambridge University Press 1988

      18 Matthew Charles, Nicholls, "Encyclopedia of Political Theology" 2010

      19 Hengel, M., "Crucifixion" Fortress Press 1978

      20 Bock, Darrell L. Acts, "Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament" Baker Academic 2007

      21 Minucius Felix, Marcus, "Ancient Christian Writers, No.39" Newman Press 1974

      22 Barnard, Leslie W., "Ancient Christian Writers, No. 56" Paulist 1997

      23 Pervo, Richard I., "Acts: A Commentary. Hermeneia-a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible" Fortress Press 2009

      24 Matthews, Shelly, "Acts of the Apostles: An Introduction and Study Guide - Taming the Tongues" Bloomsbury Publishing 2017

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-10-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Presbyterian College and Theological Seminary -> Korea Presbyterian Journal of Theology KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-11-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 통합신학연구원 -> 기독교사상과문화연구원
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Center for Studies of Christian Thoughts and Culture
      KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.69 0.69 0.64
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.66 0.58 0.855 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼