RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    영국 지적재산권법의 사상과 철학의 형성 = The Formation of the Ideas and Philosophy of British Intellectual Property Law

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110297658

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study examines the property laws of William Blackstone, praised as a great common law jurist of 18th-century Britain, and his scholarly influence on the establishment of intangible property rights. William Blackstone, following the lineage of John Locke, embraced the concepts of natural property rights and social contract theory, aiming to harmonize property rights under natural law with those under positive law. His concept of property rights is based on absolute dominion in accordance with the traditional principle of first appropriation. Therefore, his property rights imply control over a physical existence, making it impossible to recognize property rights over intangibles that lack physical substance.
    Meanwhile, he regarded that, according to the social contract theory, legal coercion is possible in civil society, and accordingly, patent rights or copyrights recognized under positive law are rights subject to legal coercion. This is also consistent with the patent-copyright provisions in the constitution and Article 22, Paragraph 2 of our Constitution. According to Blackstone’s property law doctrine, goodwill cannot be recognized as property because it lacks a physical substance. However, in the 19th century, when the concept of intellectual property rights began to be established, goodwill was also recognized as an object of property rights. Blackstone conceptualized the notion of common law deductively, so he can be regarded as an early English legal formalist, and his achievements greatly influenced the establishment of the modern concept of intellectual property rights.
    번역하기

    This study examines the property laws of William Blackstone, praised as a great common law jurist of 18th-century Britain, and his scholarly influence on the establishment of intangible property rights. William Blackstone, following the lineage of Joh...

    This study examines the property laws of William Blackstone, praised as a great common law jurist of 18th-century Britain, and his scholarly influence on the establishment of intangible property rights. William Blackstone, following the lineage of John Locke, embraced the concepts of natural property rights and social contract theory, aiming to harmonize property rights under natural law with those under positive law. His concept of property rights is based on absolute dominion in accordance with the traditional principle of first appropriation. Therefore, his property rights imply control over a physical existence, making it impossible to recognize property rights over intangibles that lack physical substance.
    Meanwhile, he regarded that, according to the social contract theory, legal coercion is possible in civil society, and accordingly, patent rights or copyrights recognized under positive law are rights subject to legal coercion. This is also consistent with the patent-copyright provisions in the constitution and Article 22, Paragraph 2 of our Constitution. According to Blackstone’s property law doctrine, goodwill cannot be recognized as property because it lacks a physical substance. However, in the 19th century, when the concept of intellectual property rights began to be established, goodwill was also recognized as an object of property rights. Blackstone conceptualized the notion of common law deductively, so he can be regarded as an early English legal formalist, and his achievements greatly influenced the establishment of the modern concept of intellectual property rights.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼