RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    전시 기획의 법적 지위 정립을 위한 법적 개선방안 검토 = A Study on Legal Improvement Measures for Establishing the Legal Status of Exhibition Curation

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110297659

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Art exhibitions have evolved beyond the mere visual display of tangible objects, diversifying into diverse forms such as archiving exhibitions that visualize knowledge systems, research-based exhibitions that manifest the process of investigation within a space, and experiential exhibitions that invite the multisensory engagement of audiences. In this environment, exhibition curators is no longer a mere mediator who selects and arranges objects; instead, they have become the central agent of the exhibition—one who investigates fragmented records and media, integrates them organically within a spatio-temporal context, and designs the overarching narrative. However, the current legal framework remains confined to a promotion system centered on tangible objects fragmented by specific genre, failing to fully encompass the intangible narrative value created by exhibition curators.
    Furthermore, there are significant challenges in interpreting an entire exhibition as a subject of copyright protection under the current Copyright Act, despite it being the direct output of creative curating process.
    Accordingly, this study examines the protection gaps in exhibition curation, focusing on legal-systemic discontinuities and substantive legal limitations, and proposes measures to enhance the effectiveness of protection for exhibition curation through legislative consistency. To this end, this article argues for the explicit inclusion of “curating,” as a core process of creative expression within the category of culture and arts under the Culture and Arts Promotion Act. This article further proposes amendments to relevant laws to ensure that the legal status of exhibition curation, is substantiated in a manner consistent with the legislative purposes of individual statutes. In addition, this study suggests newly introducing definitions for “exhibition” and “artistic works” under the Copyright Act to secure rights over the outcomes of exhibition curation. While defining the concept of exhibition curation within the realm of cultural administrative law serves as a formal requirement to establish an independent status for policy-making and administrative support, the introduction of new provisions defining exhibitions and artistic works under copyright law constitutes a substantive requirement for finalizing exclusive rights.
    번역하기

    Art exhibitions have evolved beyond the mere visual display of tangible objects, diversifying into diverse forms such as archiving exhibitions that visualize knowledge systems, research-based exhibitions that manifest the process of investigation with...

    Art exhibitions have evolved beyond the mere visual display of tangible objects, diversifying into diverse forms such as archiving exhibitions that visualize knowledge systems, research-based exhibitions that manifest the process of investigation within a space, and experiential exhibitions that invite the multisensory engagement of audiences. In this environment, exhibition curators is no longer a mere mediator who selects and arranges objects; instead, they have become the central agent of the exhibition—one who investigates fragmented records and media, integrates them organically within a spatio-temporal context, and designs the overarching narrative. However, the current legal framework remains confined to a promotion system centered on tangible objects fragmented by specific genre, failing to fully encompass the intangible narrative value created by exhibition curators.
    Furthermore, there are significant challenges in interpreting an entire exhibition as a subject of copyright protection under the current Copyright Act, despite it being the direct output of creative curating process.
    Accordingly, this study examines the protection gaps in exhibition curation, focusing on legal-systemic discontinuities and substantive legal limitations, and proposes measures to enhance the effectiveness of protection for exhibition curation through legislative consistency. To this end, this article argues for the explicit inclusion of “curating,” as a core process of creative expression within the category of culture and arts under the Culture and Arts Promotion Act. This article further proposes amendments to relevant laws to ensure that the legal status of exhibition curation, is substantiated in a manner consistent with the legislative purposes of individual statutes. In addition, this study suggests newly introducing definitions for “exhibition” and “artistic works” under the Copyright Act to secure rights over the outcomes of exhibition curation. While defining the concept of exhibition curation within the realm of cultural administrative law serves as a formal requirement to establish an independent status for policy-making and administrative support, the introduction of new provisions defining exhibitions and artistic works under copyright law constitutes a substantive requirement for finalizing exclusive rights.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼