RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전략을 추동하는 신무기 고찰 - 전략과 전장을 변화시키는 변수로서의 첨단기술력 = What’s Role of Innovative and Next-Generation Weapons in Transforming Military Strategy? Likely Advanced Military Technologies in Changing for Strategy and Battlefield

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108173767

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Does military strategy determine weapons or the other way round? In general, a well-established military strategy has facilitated to determine which weapons and operations are needed for achieving its objective.
      As state-of-the-art technology comes to the fore, however, this causation tends to be reversed. Technology can be served as an independent variable to change military strategy. Cutting-edge weapons can lead for dominant tool of winning battlefield combats by leading to military oversee battlefield dominance.
      Emerging innovative weapons are classified into three categories: conventional weapons, asymmetric weapons and nuclear weapons. These weapons have changed strategy-driven battlefield into five technology-ridden battlefields: gray zone battlefield between war and peace, fusion tactical nuclear-based battlefield, ecosystem-oriented battlefield, interconnected battlefield between kinetic and non-kinetic weapons, and hybrid and complex battlefield.
      Furthermore, the changing battlefield environment is directly linked into the changing military strategy. The recognition of technology as an independent variable sheds some light on eligible policies such as integrating military organizations, changing how to deter North Korea’s nuclear threats, and reorienting towards Korean-style gray zone military environment of the Korean Peninsula.
      번역하기

      Does military strategy determine weapons or the other way round? In general, a well-established military strategy has facilitated to determine which weapons and operations are needed for achieving its objective. As state-of-the-art technology comes to...

      Does military strategy determine weapons or the other way round? In general, a well-established military strategy has facilitated to determine which weapons and operations are needed for achieving its objective.
      As state-of-the-art technology comes to the fore, however, this causation tends to be reversed. Technology can be served as an independent variable to change military strategy. Cutting-edge weapons can lead for dominant tool of winning battlefield combats by leading to military oversee battlefield dominance.
      Emerging innovative weapons are classified into three categories: conventional weapons, asymmetric weapons and nuclear weapons. These weapons have changed strategy-driven battlefield into five technology-ridden battlefields: gray zone battlefield between war and peace, fusion tactical nuclear-based battlefield, ecosystem-oriented battlefield, interconnected battlefield between kinetic and non-kinetic weapons, and hybrid and complex battlefield.
      Furthermore, the changing battlefield environment is directly linked into the changing military strategy. The recognition of technology as an independent variable sheds some light on eligible policies such as integrating military organizations, changing how to deter North Korea’s nuclear threats, and reorienting towards Korean-style gray zone military environment of the Korean Peninsula.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼