RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    물고기, 어업 기술, 민족 관습: 식민지기 어업 경제 구조에 대한 경제인류학적 연구 = Fish, Fishery Technology, and Ethnic Customs: Economic Anthropological Analysis of Fishery Structure during the Colonial Period

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100494804

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article aims firstly to reveal the differences between fishery technologies of Joseon and Japan in the late 19th century, and examine the extent to which such differences were based on customs and ethnic preferences for particular fishes. This article clarifies that such preferences and customs were historically built in the longterm and analyzes the impact of the differences upon the development progress of the Joseon fishery (and technology) during the colonial period. The seafood trade between Joseon and Japan was triggered by Japanese fishermen who caught the fishes in Korean seas to smuggle to Japanese fish markets or to sell Korean on-board dealers. It eventually expanded in step with the expansion of Japanese imperialism. The second section of this article reveals that Japanese fishermen were able to detect the technological differences between Japanese and Korean fisheries, and clarifies that such dissimilarities originated in ethnic preferences for particular fishes. The third section demonstrates that examples such as pagrusmajor (‘cham-domi’in Korean, ‘matai’in Japanese), are indicative of the different preferences of two ethnic groups, related not to natural environments and economic development levels, but to symbolic meanings of fishes and each society’s historical formation. The customs and preferences for particular fishes were both the practices that have consistently been formed despite long-term social changes, and ‘cultural facts’that implies historical specificity of each country. The fourth section reinterprets the development process of Korean fishery during the colonial period from the perspective of economic anthropology, by showing the fact that customs and ethnic preferences for particular fishes oriented economic behaviors and structures of each country.
    번역하기

    This article aims firstly to reveal the differences between fishery technologies of Joseon and Japan in the late 19th century, and examine the extent to which such differences were based on customs and ethnic preferences for particular fishes. This ar...

    This article aims firstly to reveal the differences between fishery technologies of Joseon and Japan in the late 19th century, and examine the extent to which such differences were based on customs and ethnic preferences for particular fishes. This article clarifies that such preferences and customs were historically built in the longterm and analyzes the impact of the differences upon the development progress of the Joseon fishery (and technology) during the colonial period. The seafood trade between Joseon and Japan was triggered by Japanese fishermen who caught the fishes in Korean seas to smuggle to Japanese fish markets or to sell Korean on-board dealers. It eventually expanded in step with the expansion of Japanese imperialism. The second section of this article reveals that Japanese fishermen were able to detect the technological differences between Japanese and Korean fisheries, and clarifies that such dissimilarities originated in ethnic preferences for particular fishes. The third section demonstrates that examples such as pagrusmajor (‘cham-domi’in Korean, ‘matai’in Japanese), are indicative of the different preferences of two ethnic groups, related not to natural environments and economic development levels, but to symbolic meanings of fishes and each society’s historical formation. The customs and preferences for particular fishes were both the practices that have consistently been formed despite long-term social changes, and ‘cultural facts’that implies historical specificity of each country. The fourth section reinterprets the development process of Korean fishery during the colonial period from the perspective of economic anthropology, by showing the fact that customs and ethnic preferences for particular fishes oriented economic behaviors and structures of each country.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼