RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      탈북민 수는 왜 늘어나지 않는가? -디지털 권위주의와 생체인식기술 발전- = Why isn’t the number of North Korean Defectors increasing? - Digital authoritarianism and biometric advances -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109405066

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The number of North Korean defectors has dropped from over 1,000 in 2019 to about one-tenth since 2021. The decline has been attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and the tightening of the border between North Korea and China, but why has the number of North Korean defectors not increased as much as before despite the endemic and the liberalization of movement? This study argues that the rapid development of surveillance technology based on biometrics in China, and the use of AI-enabled arrests rather than physical arrests of traditional defectors, has contributed to the decline in defections. We explore how digital authoritarianism in China and North Korea constrains defectors and explain why, unless something dramatic changes, the number of defectors is unlikely to increase in the future.
      번역하기

      The number of North Korean defectors has dropped from over 1,000 in 2019 to about one-tenth since 2021. The decline has been attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and the tightening of the border between North Korea and China, but why has the number of ...

      The number of North Korean defectors has dropped from over 1,000 in 2019 to about one-tenth since 2021. The decline has been attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and the tightening of the border between North Korea and China, but why has the number of North Korean defectors not increased as much as before despite the endemic and the liberalization of movement? This study argues that the rapid development of surveillance technology based on biometrics in China, and the use of AI-enabled arrests rather than physical arrests of traditional defectors, has contributed to the decline in defections. We explore how digital authoritarianism in China and North Korea constrains defectors and explain why, unless something dramatic changes, the number of defectors is unlikely to increase in the future.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼