RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    관찰감가법을 적용한 건물 감정평가의 신뢰성 영향요인 실증분석과 시사점

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109943331

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study conducts an empirical analysis of the factors affecting the reliability of the Observed Depreciation Method (ODM) in building appraisal, and discusses the practical and institutional implications of its application. Despite its practical advantages, the ODM has faced criticism due to its inherent subjectivity, inconsistent results, and a lack of clear evaluation criteria.
    To explore the factors influencing the perceived reliability of the ODM, data collected from 285 licensed appraisers were analyzed using multiple regression. Eight independent variables were examined, including professional expertise, ethics, data accessibility, and various institutional factors.
    The findings indicate that ethical responsibility, technical expertise, ease of accessing cost data, and the ability to refrain from subjective judgment significantly enhance the reliability of the ODM. Conversely, factors such as the difficulty in explaining depreciation, analytical limitations, and the absence of standardized criteria did not show significant effects on reliability. This suggests that individual competence and ethical awareness play a more influential role than formal guidelines in determining the reliability of the ODM. The study concludes by highlighting the need to improve ODM reliability through enhanced professional training, stronger ethical standards, and better access to cost data. These improvements are expected to contribute to a more robust foundation for trust in real estate appraisal.
    번역하기

    This study conducts an empirical analysis of the factors affecting the reliability of the Observed Depreciation Method (ODM) in building appraisal, and discusses the practical and institutional implications of its application. Despite its practical ad...

    This study conducts an empirical analysis of the factors affecting the reliability of the Observed Depreciation Method (ODM) in building appraisal, and discusses the practical and institutional implications of its application. Despite its practical advantages, the ODM has faced criticism due to its inherent subjectivity, inconsistent results, and a lack of clear evaluation criteria.
    To explore the factors influencing the perceived reliability of the ODM, data collected from 285 licensed appraisers were analyzed using multiple regression. Eight independent variables were examined, including professional expertise, ethics, data accessibility, and various institutional factors.
    The findings indicate that ethical responsibility, technical expertise, ease of accessing cost data, and the ability to refrain from subjective judgment significantly enhance the reliability of the ODM. Conversely, factors such as the difficulty in explaining depreciation, analytical limitations, and the absence of standardized criteria did not show significant effects on reliability. This suggests that individual competence and ethical awareness play a more influential role than formal guidelines in determining the reliability of the ODM. The study concludes by highlighting the need to improve ODM reliability through enhanced professional training, stronger ethical standards, and better access to cost data. These improvements are expected to contribute to a more robust foundation for trust in real estate appraisal.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼