RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    不動産登記의 推定力에 對한 考察 = A Study on the Presumptive Effect of Real Estate Registration

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443562

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      1. CONTENTS<BR>  (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR>  In Korea, the validity of real estate registration on the operative law is authorized the effect of fluctuation of rights, conclusive effect of the precedence, and counteractive effect. On the theory of the interpretation it is the authorized presumptive effect. But it isn"t authorized the public trust. Consequently it"s the reality that can"t protect the person who trusts the register. In the view of this reality, the legal significance about the presumptive effect of the validity of real estate registration is consider ably large. It is obvious the law relation would become very different according to the theory of the interpretation. Therefore this study has an purpose to search for the reasonable theory of the interpretation.<BR>  (2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR>  We choose literature research methods through various kinds of material domestic books and theses.<BR>  (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR>  Although the theory of the probability is the predominant opinion on the foundation of sanction of the presumptive effect, it is not right that the basis of the presumptive effect puts only on the probability. In the essence of the presumptive effect, there is a conflict bet ween the theory of the presumptive effect in law and the theory of the presumptive effect in actual fact. The former is more appropriate than the latter. There is an opposition between the opinion that the presumptive effect is the presumption of rights and the one that it is the presumption of fact. The former is proper. In the personal scope that the presumptive effect reaches, there is a view which the presumption effect is not authorized among the parties but it would be adequate that it is authorized among the parties.<BR>  2. RESULTS<BR>  The presumption effect must seek for the substantial grounds in the probability. the contents on the register can be coincided with the real right"s relation. And the basis in the positive law must be the civil law article 200. And under our legislation which the public trust is not authorized, the presumption effect vests a favor status in a lawsuit to the person who trusts the register. It can contribute the security of the a real estate transaction. The presumption effect must be the presumptive effect in law.<BR>  The presumption effect is the presumption of rights. Therefore a fact of originated cause of the such rights and existed agent"s authority is presumed. And the presumption effect reaches the impleader as well as the parties of fluctuations of real rights.<BR>  The rebuttal against the presumption is generally accomplished simply by proof of the fact that are not reconcilable with the substantive and procedural fact. And in case of "Special Statutes of Registration Procedure", given the procedural characteristics and the legislative goals, in addition to the substantive and registration procedural fact, the scope of presumption encompasses every other fact needed for the recorded right.
    번역하기

      1. CONTENTS<BR>  (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR>  In Korea, the validity of real estate registration on the operative law is authorized the effect of fluctuation of rights, conclusive effect of the precedence, a...

      1. CONTENTS<BR>  (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR>  In Korea, the validity of real estate registration on the operative law is authorized the effect of fluctuation of rights, conclusive effect of the precedence, and counteractive effect. On the theory of the interpretation it is the authorized presumptive effect. But it isn"t authorized the public trust. Consequently it"s the reality that can"t protect the person who trusts the register. In the view of this reality, the legal significance about the presumptive effect of the validity of real estate registration is consider ably large. It is obvious the law relation would become very different according to the theory of the interpretation. Therefore this study has an purpose to search for the reasonable theory of the interpretation.<BR>  (2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR>  We choose literature research methods through various kinds of material domestic books and theses.<BR>  (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR>  Although the theory of the probability is the predominant opinion on the foundation of sanction of the presumptive effect, it is not right that the basis of the presumptive effect puts only on the probability. In the essence of the presumptive effect, there is a conflict bet ween the theory of the presumptive effect in law and the theory of the presumptive effect in actual fact. The former is more appropriate than the latter. There is an opposition between the opinion that the presumptive effect is the presumption of rights and the one that it is the presumption of fact. The former is proper. In the personal scope that the presumptive effect reaches, there is a view which the presumption effect is not authorized among the parties but it would be adequate that it is authorized among the parties.<BR>  2. RESULTS<BR>  The presumption effect must seek for the substantial grounds in the probability. the contents on the register can be coincided with the real right"s relation. And the basis in the positive law must be the civil law article 200. And under our legislation which the public trust is not authorized, the presumption effect vests a favor status in a lawsuit to the person who trusts the register. It can contribute the security of the a real estate transaction. The presumption effect must be the presumptive effect in law.<BR>  The presumption effect is the presumption of rights. Therefore a fact of originated cause of the such rights and existed agent"s authority is presumed. And the presumption effect reaches the impleader as well as the parties of fluctuations of real rights.<BR>  The rebuttal against the presumption is generally accomplished simply by proof of the fact that are not reconcilable with the substantive and procedural fact. And in case of "Special Statutes of Registration Procedure", given the procedural characteristics and the legislative goals, in addition to the substantive and registration procedural fact, the scope of presumption encompasses every other fact needed for the recorded right.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
      Ⅰ. 序論
      Ⅱ. 우리나라 부동산등기제도의 이론적 배경
      Ⅲ. 推定力의 認定根據와 性質
      Ⅳ. 推定力의 範圍
      Ⅴ. 推定力의 飜覆
      Ⅵ. 結論
      參考文獻
    • ABSTRACT
      Ⅰ. 序論
      Ⅱ. 우리나라 부동산등기제도의 이론적 배경
      Ⅲ. 推定力의 認定根據와 性質
      Ⅳ. 推定力의 範圍
      Ⅴ. 推定力의 飜覆
      Ⅵ. 結論
      參考文獻
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼