관료의 정책이념과 정부의 제도가 통상협상 결과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 - 한·일 FTA 협상을 중심으로 -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study analyzed the mechanism and dynamics of the interaction effects of bureaucrat’s policy idea and trade policy institution on trade negotiations among countries. With the analysis of Korea’s FTA deals with Japan, this research found that trade bureaucrat’s policy idea and state’s trade policy institution are the determinants which have affected the trade deal results. Concerning the case analysis of Korea-Japan FTA negotiation, it was failed to conclude because of Korean trade bureaucrats’ strategic denial of the Japan’s final offer of concessional rate of market liberalization. The deal had become to be in stalemate under the discrepancy of trade bureaucrats’ strategic stance on policy ideas and strategic management of institution. The ideas of bureaucrats of both countries were the same as passive liberalism. However the level of strategic management of institutional slack, which has been exploited by trade bureaucrats of both parties, was quite different at each country. The level of bureaucrats’ strategic management of institution and institutional slack was higher in Korea than in Japan. This means that the governmental politics of the Office of the Minister for Trade (OMT) of Korea against with other competing players was relatively more dominant at the domestic political bargaining process rather than that of Japan. Furthermore, the trade bureaucrats and trade organizations strategically exploited the institutional slack for the benefit of individual and organizational interests by way of governmental politics and organizational behaviors against the rival entities at the domestic political bargaining.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 선행연구에 대한 비판적 검토
• Ⅲ. 연구 설계
• Ⅳ. 한·일 통상관료의 정책이념과 통상정책 제도
• Ⅴ. 분석결과: 정책이념과 제도가 협상결과에 미친 영향
• Ⅵ. 결론: 중단된 한·일 FTA 협상의 시사점
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이달곤, "협상론: 협상의 과정, 구조, 그리고 전략" 법문사 2005

2 하연섭, "제도 분석: 이론과 쟁점" 다산출판사 2011

3 정정길, "정책학원론" 대명출판사 2007

4 박성빈, "일본의 중앙정부조직개편과 내각기능의 강화 : 대장성 개혁과 경제재정자문회의를 중심으로" 2008

5 이지연, "일본-멕시코 FTA협상과정의 이익갈등구조와 협상자 전략 : 투 레벨 게임 이론을 통한 분석" 이화여자대학교 대학원 2006

6 이승주, "일본 FTA 정책의 형성과 변화: 행위자와 제도의 상호작용을 중심으로" 극동문제연구소 25 (25): 65-97, 2009

7 구민교, "우리나라의 통상전략 및 통상행정체계의 재조명" 2013

8 최병선, "미국의 무역정책 결정과정" 서울대학교 행정대학원 34 (34): 101-145, 1996

9 김정수, "미국 통상정책의 정치경제학" 일신사 1996

10 최병선, "무역정치경제론" 박영사 1999

11 김기홍, "내부협상의 관점에서 본 한일 FTA 논의 분석" 한일경상학회 32 : 29-55, 2005

12 파이낸셜뉴스, "김현종 통상교섭본부장, 한‧일FTA 추진은 무책임한 선택, 2007. 7. 10"

13 竹中治堅, "首相支配 : 日本政治の變貌" 中公新書 2006

14 宗像直子, "日本の東アジア構想" 慶応義塾大学出版会 2004

15 Dahl, Robert A., "Who Governs?" Yale University Press 1961

16 Goldstein, Judith, "The Political Economy of Trade: Institutions of Protection" 80 (80): 161-184,

17 Meyer, John W., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis" University of Chicago Press 1991

18 North, D. C., "Institution, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance" Cambridge University Press 1990

19 머니투데이, "FTA 타결 후 재협상 없다, 2007. 4. 4"

20 Allison, Graham T., "Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis" Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers 1999

21 Wilson, J. Q., "Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It" Basic Books 1989