RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      근관와동형태에 따른 근관치료된 하악절치의 파절강도 = THE INFLUENCE OF DIFFERENT ACCESS CAVITY DESIGNS ON THE FRACTURE STRENGTH IN ENDODONTICALLY TREATED MANDIBULAR ANTERIOR TEETH

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82406636

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Straight access cavity design allows the operator to locate all canals, helps in proper cleaning and shaping, ultimately facilitates the obturation of the canal system. However, change in the fracture strength according to the access cavity designs wa...

      Straight access cavity design allows the operator to locate all canals, helps in proper cleaning and shaping, ultimately facilitates the obturation of the canal system. However, change in the fracture strength according to the access cavity designs was not clearly demonstrated yet. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of different access cavity designs on the fracture strength in endodontically treated mandibular anterior teeth.
      Recently extracted mandibular anterior teeth that have no caries, cervical abrasion, and fracture were divided into three groups (Group 1 : conventional lingual access cavity, Group 2 : straight access cavity, Group 3 : extended straight access cavity) according to the cavity designs. After conventional endodontic treatment, cavities were filled with resin core material. Compressive loads parallel to the long axis of the teeth were applied at a crosshead speed of 2mm/min until the fracture occurred. The fracture strength analyzed with ANOVA and the Scheffe test at the 95% confidence level.
      The results of this study were as follows :
      1. The mean fracture strength decrease in following sequence Group 1 (558.90 ± 77.40 N), Group 2 (494.07 ± 123.98 N) and Group 3 (267.33 ± 27.02 N).
      2. There was significant difference between Group 3 and other groups (P = 0.00).
      Considering advantage of direct access to apical third and results of this study, straight access cavity is recommended for access cavity form of the mandibular anterior teeth

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "하악 절치의 근관계에 관한 연구" 27 (27): 432-439, 2002

      2 "anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth" 458-467, 1992

      3 "Straight-line endodontic access to anterior teeth" 59 (59): 418-419, 1985

      4 "Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth" 38 (38): 541-546, 1993

      5 "Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design" 68 (68): 428-435, 1992

      6 "Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth" 2 (2): 374-375, 1976

      7 "Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures" 15 (15): 512-516, 1989

      8 "Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth" 10 (10): 91-93, 1994

      9 "Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation" 9 (9): 475-479, 1983

      10 "Incidence of two root canals in human mandibular incisor" 38 (38): 122-126, 1974

      1 "하악 절치의 근관계에 관한 연구" 27 (27): 432-439, 2002

      2 "anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth" 458-467, 1992

      3 "Straight-line endodontic access to anterior teeth" 59 (59): 418-419, 1985

      4 "Site comparisons of dentine collagen cross-links from extracted human teeth" 38 (38): 541-546, 1993

      5 "Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design" 68 (68): 428-435, 1992

      6 "Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth" 2 (2): 374-375, 1976

      7 "Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures" 15 (15): 512-516, 1989

      8 "Moisture content of vital vs endodontically treated teeth" 10 (10): 91-93, 1994

      9 "Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation" 9 (9): 475-479, 1983

      10 "Incidence of two root canals in human mandibular incisor" 38 (38): 122-126, 1974

      11 "Ideal endodontic access in mandibular incisors" 25 (25): 206-207, 1999

      12 "Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study." 26 (26): 427-433, 2001

      13 "Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth" 63 (63): 529-536, 1990

      14 "Endodontic access to maxillary lateral incisors" 52 (52): 443-445, 1981

      15 "Endodontic Therapy" Mosby 104-163, 2003

      16 "Effect of access cavity location and design on degree and distribution of instrumented root canal surface in maxillary anterior teeth" 34 (34): 176-183, 2001

      17 "Determination of the moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth" 34 (34): 661-670, 1972

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.25 0.25 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.21 0.19 0.448 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼