RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Comparing Perceptual Learning Style Preferences of EFL Learners in Korea and Uzbekistan: A Mixed-Methods Study

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110089713

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This mixed-methods study explores perceptual learning style preferences among Korean and Uzbek EFL learners and examines teachers’ interpretations of these preferences. Quantitative data were collected from secondary-level learners in both countries (N= 208) using Reid’s PLSPQ, followed by semi-structured interviews with English teachers (n= 18) to contextualize survey patterns. The PLSPQ was selected for its modality-based structure and comparability with current EFL research, and teacher interviews were added to triangulate self-report. Independent-samples t-tests showed that Uzbek learners reported significantly higher preferences across all six modalities, with no group differences on visual. These higher scores are interpreted as context-responsive tendencies rather than indicators of superior ability, with Uzbek patterns linked to smaller classes, limited private tutoring, early instruction prior to full literacy, and movement-based activities in resource-limited schools. In contrast, narrower preference profiles among Korean learners align with exam-oriented, text-focused instruction, larger classes, and classroom norms of deference. While this study contributes a cross-context perspective on learning style preferences, its findings are limited by reliance on self-report and the absence of factor analytic validation of the PLSPQ. Future research should include psychometric testing and behavioral measures. Overall, results underscore the value of inclusive, multimodal pedagogy and learner metacognitive awareness.
    번역하기

    This mixed-methods study explores perceptual learning style preferences among Korean and Uzbek EFL learners and examines teachers’ interpretations of these preferences. Quantitative data were collected from secondary-level learners in both countries...

    This mixed-methods study explores perceptual learning style preferences among Korean and Uzbek EFL learners and examines teachers’ interpretations of these preferences. Quantitative data were collected from secondary-level learners in both countries (N= 208) using Reid’s PLSPQ, followed by semi-structured interviews with English teachers (n= 18) to contextualize survey patterns. The PLSPQ was selected for its modality-based structure and comparability with current EFL research, and teacher interviews were added to triangulate self-report. Independent-samples t-tests showed that Uzbek learners reported significantly higher preferences across all six modalities, with no group differences on visual. These higher scores are interpreted as context-responsive tendencies rather than indicators of superior ability, with Uzbek patterns linked to smaller classes, limited private tutoring, early instruction prior to full literacy, and movement-based activities in resource-limited schools. In contrast, narrower preference profiles among Korean learners align with exam-oriented, text-focused instruction, larger classes, and classroom norms of deference. While this study contributes a cross-context perspective on learning style preferences, its findings are limited by reliance on self-report and the absence of factor analytic validation of the PLSPQ. Future research should include psychometric testing and behavioral measures. Overall, results underscore the value of inclusive, multimodal pedagogy and learner metacognitive awareness.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. Introduction
    • II. Theoretical Background
    • 1. Conceptualizing Learning Styles
    • 2. Critiques and Contemporary Interpretations
    • 3. Empirical Studies with PLSPQ
    • I. Introduction
    • II. Theoretical Background
    • 1. Conceptualizing Learning Styles
    • 2. Critiques and Contemporary Interpretations
    • 3. Empirical Studies with PLSPQ
    • III. Research Method
    • 1. Participants
    • 2. Data Collection
    • 3. Data Analysis
    • IV. Results and Discussion
    • 1. Results
    • 2. Discussion
    • V. Conclusion
    • References
    • APPENDIX 1
    • APPENDIX 2
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼