RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    사회구성주의 관점에서의 독자 -결정과자율의 사이에서 성찰하는 독자 = Investigation of the Reader in Social Constructivism

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100262222

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article aims to make it clear where the ‘reader’ in social constructivism is different from that of dominant discourses of reading education. For this, this ariticle analyzes the epistemologies of them and describes the reader formation effects of those discourses by assessing the student-readers` actual responses. Dominant discourses are classified into autonomism and constructivism. Autonomism supposes that a subject is not constructed through the relation with the other, but exists independently. It includes the text-centered view on reading and expressivistic view on reading: The former is likely to form the passive reader who obeys the intention of text, the latter fix the reader`s present response ability. To the contrary, constructivism has the context-centerd thought and emphasizes the interrelation among subject, object and context. The cognitivism on reading and socialcultural reading viewpoint have the constructivistic implication. The cognitivism on reading has the possibility of deconstructing the autonomism, but it doesn`t consider reader`s background knowledge within the social context. Social-cultural reading viewpoint explains that text and reader are socially constructed, but it maybe turned into objectiveautonomistic discourse. To set up a truly social constructivistic reading discourse, we should recognize that the reader is ‘determined’ by dominant discourse as well as ‘deconstructs’ and ‘reconstructs’ it. The reader is both stable and fluid; he/she is partly confined within self identity and partly open to context. To form the reflective and critical reader, reading education shoud stress the interrelationship between readers, the critical reflection on context, and the recovery of ‘self’.
    번역하기

    This article aims to make it clear where the ‘reader’ in social constructivism is different from that of dominant discourses of reading education. For this, this ariticle analyzes the epistemologies of them and describes the reader formation effec...

    This article aims to make it clear where the ‘reader’ in social constructivism is different from that of dominant discourses of reading education. For this, this ariticle analyzes the epistemologies of them and describes the reader formation effects of those discourses by assessing the student-readers` actual responses. Dominant discourses are classified into autonomism and constructivism. Autonomism supposes that a subject is not constructed through the relation with the other, but exists independently. It includes the text-centered view on reading and expressivistic view on reading: The former is likely to form the passive reader who obeys the intention of text, the latter fix the reader`s present response ability. To the contrary, constructivism has the context-centerd thought and emphasizes the interrelation among subject, object and context. The cognitivism on reading and socialcultural reading viewpoint have the constructivistic implication. The cognitivism on reading has the possibility of deconstructing the autonomism, but it doesn`t consider reader`s background knowledge within the social context. Social-cultural reading viewpoint explains that text and reader are socially constructed, but it maybe turned into objectiveautonomistic discourse. To set up a truly social constructivistic reading discourse, we should recognize that the reader is ‘determined’ by dominant discourse as well as ‘deconstructs’ and ‘reconstructs’ it. The reader is both stable and fluid; he/she is partly confined within self identity and partly open to context. To form the reflective and critical reader, reading education shoud stress the interrelationship between readers, the critical reflection on context, and the recovery of ‘self’.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼