RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    포트폴리오 평가 방식을 적용한 체육 수업의 분석 = Analysis of Instuction in the Portfolio Assessment of Physical Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2098027

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of the study was to identify the effects of portfolio assessment in physical education. Portfolio assessment groups were compared with traditional assessment groups. The devices used in evaluating the effects of tile instructional assessments were method of managing lesson, active learning time, interactions between teachers and students, interactions among the students, Four schools were involved in the study, in which two primary schools hired portfolio assessment and the other two primary schools applied traditional assessment. To make the study mort reliable, 80 physical education specialists, trained in using portfolio assessment, were selected as descriptive survey examinees. Data collection was made by employing (1) document collection, (2) narrative observation, (3) participant observation, (4) in-depth interview, (5) descriptive survey, which are usually used in ethnographic study. The data collected were analyzed by using (1) coding by subjects, (2) taxonomic analysis, (3) plan analysis, (4) process analysis, (5) learning time analysis, (6) frequency analysis. In the research, two assessment systems were employed: one was traditional assessment system and the other one was portfolio assessment system. The results of the study are as follows:
    1. Portfolio assessment groups practiced a variety of learning methods such as individual learning, group learning, interaction learning, while traditional assessment groups implemented conventional instruction.
    2. Portfolio assessment groups had more active learning time than traditional assessment groups.
    3. Portfolio assessment groups used various types of interactions-interaction between students and teachers, among peers, leaders and members. However, traditional assessment groups showed only one style of interaction-interaction between students and teachers.
    4. High grade students in Portfolio assessment groups showed higher attention span. However, low grade students in portfolio assessment groups displayed lower attention span than those of the traditional assessment groups.
    Following are some suggestions for future physical education class:
    1. Teachers lesson plan employing portfolio assessment system should be made so that portfolio assessment might be widely used in school.
    2. Teachers should not be afraid of change. This would lead to the environment in which more teachers would be willing to use portfolio assessment system in school.
    3. Teachers are required to guide low grade students individually so that the students know how to use portfolio assessment system.
    번역하기

    The purpose of the study was to identify the effects of portfolio assessment in physical education. Portfolio assessment groups were compared with traditional assessment groups. The devices used in evaluating the effects of tile instructional assessme...

    The purpose of the study was to identify the effects of portfolio assessment in physical education. Portfolio assessment groups were compared with traditional assessment groups. The devices used in evaluating the effects of tile instructional assessments were method of managing lesson, active learning time, interactions between teachers and students, interactions among the students, Four schools were involved in the study, in which two primary schools hired portfolio assessment and the other two primary schools applied traditional assessment. To make the study mort reliable, 80 physical education specialists, trained in using portfolio assessment, were selected as descriptive survey examinees. Data collection was made by employing (1) document collection, (2) narrative observation, (3) participant observation, (4) in-depth interview, (5) descriptive survey, which are usually used in ethnographic study. The data collected were analyzed by using (1) coding by subjects, (2) taxonomic analysis, (3) plan analysis, (4) process analysis, (5) learning time analysis, (6) frequency analysis. In the research, two assessment systems were employed: one was traditional assessment system and the other one was portfolio assessment system. The results of the study are as follows:
    1. Portfolio assessment groups practiced a variety of learning methods such as individual learning, group learning, interaction learning, while traditional assessment groups implemented conventional instruction.
    2. Portfolio assessment groups had more active learning time than traditional assessment groups.
    3. Portfolio assessment groups used various types of interactions-interaction between students and teachers, among peers, leaders and members. However, traditional assessment groups showed only one style of interaction-interaction between students and teachers.
    4. High grade students in Portfolio assessment groups showed higher attention span. However, low grade students in portfolio assessment groups displayed lower attention span than those of the traditional assessment groups.
    Following are some suggestions for future physical education class:
    1. Teachers lesson plan employing portfolio assessment system should be made so that portfolio assessment might be widely used in school.
    2. Teachers should not be afraid of change. This would lead to the environment in which more teachers would be willing to use portfolio assessment system in school.
    3. Teachers are required to guide low grade students individually so that the students know how to use portfolio assessment system.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 연구 방법 및 절차
    • IV. 연구 대상 학급의 배경
    • V. 결과 및 분석
    • VI. 결론
    • I. 서론
    • II. 연구 방법 및 절차
    • IV. 연구 대상 학급의 배경
    • V. 결과 및 분석
    • VI. 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼