RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    크라우드펀딩 사이언스 -크라우드펀딩의 연구개발분야 적용가능성과 법적 쟁점 검토-

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100543521

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims at analyzing the introduction of crowdfunding science in Korea from a legal point of view. It is composed of three main parts: The first part defines and groups the types of crowdfunding and reviews foreign legal trends on the issue; Second, it narrows down the focus into crowdfunding science and analyzes the most famous funding portals in this field; Third, it deals with the legal issues of donation/reward-based crowdfunding from the perspective of three stakeholders such as researchers, funding portals, and funding portals.
    From a point of researchers, the Act of Raising Contributions does not fully regulate the behaviors of raising money for research through crowdfunding science in terms of coverage, registration requirement, and limit of rasing contributions. From a point of funding portals, it should clarify the right and the responsibility that they have as internet service providers. In particular, it needs to make it clear when funding portals enjoy safe harbour provisions in spite of intentional unlawful behaviours of researchers. From a point of funding portal, this paper emphasizes on the risk of leaking incomplete technologies by funders, the public. The current laws such as「 Industrial technology leakage prevention act」and「 Unfair competition prevention and trade secret protection act」is not appropriate to protect the technologies that are not fully developed.
    In conclusion, it is time to consider the way to revise relevant laws to boost crowdfunding science with the donation/reward-based crowdfunding funding portals, which have not gotten attention so far because of the public purpose.
    번역하기

    This paper aims at analyzing the introduction of crowdfunding science in Korea from a legal point of view. It is composed of three main parts: The first part defines and groups the types of crowdfunding and reviews foreign legal trends on the issue; S...

    This paper aims at analyzing the introduction of crowdfunding science in Korea from a legal point of view. It is composed of three main parts: The first part defines and groups the types of crowdfunding and reviews foreign legal trends on the issue; Second, it narrows down the focus into crowdfunding science and analyzes the most famous funding portals in this field; Third, it deals with the legal issues of donation/reward-based crowdfunding from the perspective of three stakeholders such as researchers, funding portals, and funding portals.
    From a point of researchers, the Act of Raising Contributions does not fully regulate the behaviors of raising money for research through crowdfunding science in terms of coverage, registration requirement, and limit of rasing contributions. From a point of funding portals, it should clarify the right and the responsibility that they have as internet service providers. In particular, it needs to make it clear when funding portals enjoy safe harbour provisions in spite of intentional unlawful behaviours of researchers. From a point of funding portal, this paper emphasizes on the risk of leaking incomplete technologies by funders, the public. The current laws such as「 Industrial technology leakage prevention act」and「 Unfair competition prevention and trade secret protection act」is not appropriate to protect the technologies that are not fully developed.
    In conclusion, it is time to consider the way to revise relevant laws to boost crowdfunding science with the donation/reward-based crowdfunding funding portals, which have not gotten attention so far because of the public purpose.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I. 서론
    • II. 크라우드펀딩의 개념과 국내외 입법동향
    • 1. 개념과 유형
    • 2. 입법동향 : 미국
    • 3. 입법동향 : 우리나라
    • I. 서론
    • II. 크라우드펀딩의 개념과 국내외 입법동향
    • 1. 개념과 유형
    • 2. 입법동향 : 미국
    • 3. 입법동향 : 우리나라
    • III. 크라우드펀딩 사이언스의 활성화 가능
    • 1. 개념과 의의
    • 2. 주요 사례 분석: 킥스타터 v. 마이크로라이자
    • 3. 소결 : 크라우드펀딩 사이언스의 법적 쟁점설정
    • IV. 크라우드펀딩 사이언스의 주요 법적 쟁점검토
    • 1. 자금수요자의 측면
    • 2. 자금중개자(펀딩포털)의 측면
    • 3. 자금공급자 : 연구개발 프로젝트의 고유한특성과 관련된 법적 문제
    • V. 결론
    • 【참고문헌】
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼