RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    불교 분별지의 교육적 의의 = The Educational Significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76552047

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The paper has tried to demonstrate the educational significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna in the Buddhist context of arguments where the former is obviously contrasted with the latter. While the idea of Vijna is seen as the differentiating apparatus of wisdom, that of Prajna is as the integrative apparatus of wisdom beyond any kind of differentiation. Thus the Buddhist teaching has shown us that Prajna is the goal that we ought to attain through ascetic practices, whereas Vijna is the kind of obstacles to remove. But this teaching is to have a different story in the educational situations where we have ordinarily experienced so that this Buddhist maxim can virtually introduce us to the nihilist position and moral anarchy and whatsoever. By analysing the idea of Vijna has its own roles for Prajna, the three kinds of Vijna has been drawn: the source of worldly desires and wild fancy harassed, the necessary means for Prajna, and the self-similarity of Prajna. The arguments taken so far, however, shows us that kinds of differentiating operation of mind are to be required for attaining Prajna. Although the physiological eye should be given up for removing any kinds of obstacles to the real wisdom, the epistemological eye for the outward differentiation of mind should be required for attaining the inward eye of mind for the inward integration of mind seen as Prajna. The fact that the differentiating operation of mind should be required as an necessary means for attaining Prajna as the real wisdom, examined in the paper, is supported and also justified by the teachings in the Buddhist Sutras such as the Prajna Sutra, the Diamond Sutra, and the Sixth Great Mentor`s Precepts. The points demonstrated in the paper have also been justified in the education situations as such: the developmental, the epistemological, the practicable, and the moral aspects. In a word, two Buddhist conceptions of wisdom have the peculiar characteristics of self-similarity, where we never fail to ignore the significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna in the educational practices. This can be, as well-known metaphor in the Diamond Sutra, understood as the allegory of raft that should be eventually lay down for Nirvana, and still works in all sorts of educational situations as well.
    번역하기

    The paper has tried to demonstrate the educational significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna in the Buddhist context of arguments where the former is obviously contrasted with the latter. While the idea of Vijna is seen as the differentiating apparat...

    The paper has tried to demonstrate the educational significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna in the Buddhist context of arguments where the former is obviously contrasted with the latter. While the idea of Vijna is seen as the differentiating apparatus of wisdom, that of Prajna is as the integrative apparatus of wisdom beyond any kind of differentiation. Thus the Buddhist teaching has shown us that Prajna is the goal that we ought to attain through ascetic practices, whereas Vijna is the kind of obstacles to remove. But this teaching is to have a different story in the educational situations where we have ordinarily experienced so that this Buddhist maxim can virtually introduce us to the nihilist position and moral anarchy and whatsoever. By analysing the idea of Vijna has its own roles for Prajna, the three kinds of Vijna has been drawn: the source of worldly desires and wild fancy harassed, the necessary means for Prajna, and the self-similarity of Prajna. The arguments taken so far, however, shows us that kinds of differentiating operation of mind are to be required for attaining Prajna. Although the physiological eye should be given up for removing any kinds of obstacles to the real wisdom, the epistemological eye for the outward differentiation of mind should be required for attaining the inward eye of mind for the inward integration of mind seen as Prajna. The fact that the differentiating operation of mind should be required as an necessary means for attaining Prajna as the real wisdom, examined in the paper, is supported and also justified by the teachings in the Buddhist Sutras such as the Prajna Sutra, the Diamond Sutra, and the Sixth Great Mentor`s Precepts. The points demonstrated in the paper have also been justified in the education situations as such: the developmental, the epistemological, the practicable, and the moral aspects. In a word, two Buddhist conceptions of wisdom have the peculiar characteristics of self-similarity, where we never fail to ignore the significance of Vijna for attaining Prajna in the educational practices. This can be, as well-known metaphor in the Diamond Sutra, understood as the allegory of raft that should be eventually lay down for Nirvana, and still works in all sorts of educational situations as well.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김용운, "프랙탈과 카오스의 세계" 우성 1998

    2 김용운, "카오스와 불교" 사이언스북스 2001

    3 남지심, "장편소설 청화 큰스님 상·하" 랜덤하우스 중앙 2005

    4 숭산, "선의 나침반(2)" 열림원 2001b

    5 숭산, "선의 나침반(1)" 열림원 2001a

    6 홍정식, "반야심경/금강경/법화경/유마경/회쟁론/육조단경" 동서문화사 2008

    7 서경수 역, "미란다 팡하" 동국대학교 부설역경원 1978

    8 소광섭, "물리학과 대승기신론" 서울대학교 출판부 1999

    9 청안, "꽃과 벌" 김영사 2006

    10 김정래, "교육이론의 두 가지 측면: 교육이론의 실제성과 실제적 지식의 언어화" 한국교육철학회 (35) : 285-316, 2008

    1 김용운, "프랙탈과 카오스의 세계" 우성 1998

    2 김용운, "카오스와 불교" 사이언스북스 2001

    3 남지심, "장편소설 청화 큰스님 상·하" 랜덤하우스 중앙 2005

    4 숭산, "선의 나침반(2)" 열림원 2001b

    5 숭산, "선의 나침반(1)" 열림원 2001a

    6 홍정식, "반야심경/금강경/법화경/유마경/회쟁론/육조단경" 동서문화사 2008

    7 서경수 역, "미란다 팡하" 동국대학교 부설역경원 1978

    8 소광섭, "물리학과 대승기신론" 서울대학교 출판부 1999

    9 청안, "꽃과 벌" 김영사 2006

    10 김정래, "교육이론의 두 가지 측면: 교육이론의 실제성과 실제적 지식의 언어화" 한국교육철학회 (35) : 285-316, 2008

    11 "金剛經"

    12 김학주, "荀子" 을유문화사 2008

    13 정병조, "智慧의 完成" 동국대학교 부설역경원 1979

    14 "摩訶般若波羅蜜多心經(般若心經)"

    15 황산덕, "如來藏" 동국대학교 부설 역경원 1980

    16 "六祖壇經"

    17 Piaget, J, "The Psychology of the Child" Basic Books 1969

    18 Chong An, "The Flowers and the Bee" Gimmyoung 2006

    19 Ryle,G, "The Concept of Mind" Barnes and Noble 1949

    20 Seung Sahn, "The Compass of Zen" Shambhala 1997

    21 Polanyi,M, "Tacit Dimension" Doubleday 1966

    22 Polanyi,M, "Personal Knowledge" University of Chicago Press 1962

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼