RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      장공 김재준 신학의 특징; 복음적 사회참여 신학 = He Distinctiveness of Jang Gong, Jai Joon Kim`s Theology -A Critical Reflection-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99647305

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Jang Gong was not a liberal theologian, but Neo-Orthodoxtheologian. He confessed that he has become an evangelist, since receiving Christ as a personal savior after experiencing the conversion. He intended to succeed the tradition of Calvin and Barth. He insisted on the purpose-oriented inspiration of the Scripture. He was a scholar who showed the intellectual conscience against the church establishment. He was a scholarly leader who showed a social responsiblity and contribution of the church. His theology can be characterized as a evangelicalism of social participation. However, he missed the plenaryinspiration that the Scripture comes to us as a whole in the words, misunderstanding the organic inspiration as michanical one. He tended to reduce the historical Jesus into a social prophet. He had regrettably not carried out the theological works finished in the harsh confrontation with the military regime at that time. Korean church today would become more harmonious, if he could participate in to the social change, embracing the orthodoxy.
      번역하기

      Jang Gong was not a liberal theologian, but Neo-Orthodoxtheologian. He confessed that he has become an evangelist, since receiving Christ as a personal savior after experiencing the conversion. He intended to succeed the tradition of Calvin and Barth....

      Jang Gong was not a liberal theologian, but Neo-Orthodoxtheologian. He confessed that he has become an evangelist, since receiving Christ as a personal savior after experiencing the conversion. He intended to succeed the tradition of Calvin and Barth. He insisted on the purpose-oriented inspiration of the Scripture. He was a scholar who showed the intellectual conscience against the church establishment. He was a scholarly leader who showed a social responsiblity and contribution of the church. His theology can be characterized as a evangelicalism of social participation. However, he missed the plenaryinspiration that the Scripture comes to us as a whole in the words, misunderstanding the organic inspiration as michanical one. He tended to reduce the historical Jesus into a social prophet. He had regrettably not carried out the theological works finished in the harsh confrontation with the military regime at that time. Korean church today would become more harmonious, if he could participate in to the social change, embracing the orthodoxy.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼