RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      소비절제 라이프스타일이 상업적 공유 경제 시스템 수용에 미치는 영향: 공유 효용을 중심으로 = The Effects of Anti-Consumption Lifestyle on Commercial Sharing System Acceptance: Focusing on Sharing Utility

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106112815

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      While commercial sharing system is growing in various fields such as automobiles, clothing, and accommodation, studies are under way to examine the various motivations of consumers using commercial sharing systems. The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions of discriminatory utility of commercial sharing systems according to the anti-consumption lifestyles that consumers are interested in, and to investigate how they relate to sharing attitudes and intention. Anti-consumption lifestyle is divided into frugality, voluntary simplicity and tightwadism (obsessive consumption abstinence). We examine how each has a relationship with utility (usage, anti-industrial, and social utility) in the area of commercial sharing system. For the hypothesis test, the factors of anti-consumption lifestyle and the utility of automobile sharing system were measured and the data were collected and the relation of each constitutional concept was confirmed by using structural equations model. As a result, the frugality and the voluntary simplicity lifestyle were found to be related to the usage, anti - industrial utility, and social utility of the commercial sharing system respectively, and the tightwadism had a negative effect on the perceived usage utility. The three utilities of the commercial sharing system have a positive effect on the sharing attitude but have no effect on the intention directly, but influence the intention by mediating the attitude. This study is expected to provide a basis for the implementation of differentiated marketing strategies for the commercial sharing systems by confirming the differential recognition of the sharing utility according to the anticonsumption lifestyle.
      번역하기

      While commercial sharing system is growing in various fields such as automobiles, clothing, and accommodation, studies are under way to examine the various motivations of consumers using commercial sharing systems. The purpose of this study is to exam...

      While commercial sharing system is growing in various fields such as automobiles, clothing, and accommodation, studies are under way to examine the various motivations of consumers using commercial sharing systems. The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions of discriminatory utility of commercial sharing systems according to the anti-consumption lifestyles that consumers are interested in, and to investigate how they relate to sharing attitudes and intention. Anti-consumption lifestyle is divided into frugality, voluntary simplicity and tightwadism (obsessive consumption abstinence). We examine how each has a relationship with utility (usage, anti-industrial, and social utility) in the area of commercial sharing system. For the hypothesis test, the factors of anti-consumption lifestyle and the utility of automobile sharing system were measured and the data were collected and the relation of each constitutional concept was confirmed by using structural equations model. As a result, the frugality and the voluntary simplicity lifestyle were found to be related to the usage, anti - industrial utility, and social utility of the commercial sharing system respectively, and the tightwadism had a negative effect on the perceived usage utility. The three utilities of the commercial sharing system have a positive effect on the sharing attitude but have no effect on the intention directly, but influence the intention by mediating the attitude. This study is expected to provide a basis for the implementation of differentiated marketing strategies for the commercial sharing systems by confirming the differential recognition of the sharing utility according to the anticonsumption lifestyle.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "허핑턴포스트"

      2 "한국 무역신문"

      3 류미현, "한국 대학생과 재한 중국 유학생소비자의 환경관련 정보요구도 비교 연구" 한국소비문화학회 17 (17): 131-154, 2014

      4 "한경 경제용어사전"

      5 두경자, "주부의 근검절약 의식과 근검절약 행동에 관한 연구" 2 (2): 91-101, 1998

      6 황혜정, "절제된 소비의 작은 탈출구, ‘작은 사치’가늘고 있다" 10 (10): 30-34, 2014

      7 이성림, "전기절약방법의 효과에 대한 소비자인식과 실천행동에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 26 (26): 1-12, 2008

      8 유두련, "재활용 행동 집단별 소비자 특성과 영향요인에 관한 비교연구" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 53-67, 2002

      9 송인숙, "자발적으로 간소화하는 생활방식에 관한 연구" 37 (37): 85-95, 1999

      10 성영애, "소비절제를 추구하는 라이프스타일과 행복에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 27 (27): 233-254, 2016

      1 "허핑턴포스트"

      2 "한국 무역신문"

      3 류미현, "한국 대학생과 재한 중국 유학생소비자의 환경관련 정보요구도 비교 연구" 한국소비문화학회 17 (17): 131-154, 2014

      4 "한경 경제용어사전"

      5 두경자, "주부의 근검절약 의식과 근검절약 행동에 관한 연구" 2 (2): 91-101, 1998

      6 황혜정, "절제된 소비의 작은 탈출구, ‘작은 사치’가늘고 있다" 10 (10): 30-34, 2014

      7 이성림, "전기절약방법의 효과에 대한 소비자인식과 실천행동에 관한 연구" 한국가정관리학회 26 (26): 1-12, 2008

      8 유두련, "재활용 행동 집단별 소비자 특성과 영향요인에 관한 비교연구" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 53-67, 2002

      9 송인숙, "자발적으로 간소화하는 생활방식에 관한 연구" 37 (37): 85-95, 1999

      10 성영애, "소비절제를 추구하는 라이프스타일과 행복에 관한 연구" 한국소비자학회 27 (27): 233-254, 2016

      11 노영래, "소비자의 환경의식· 재활용의식과 재활용행동에 관한 연구- 미혼취업여성의 사장의복을 중심으로 -" 대한가정학회 40 (40): 163-178, 2002

      12 여정성, "소비자의 에너지 절약행동 및 에너지 정책에 대한 호응도" 14 (14): 227-240, 1996

      13 조은미, "생활양식이 포장폐기물 재활용 행동에 미치는 영향" 한국가족자원경영학회 7 (7): 119-133, 2003

      14 이미정, "물질주의 가치관이 재활용 신념과 태도, 그리고 재활용품 구매행동에 미치는 영향" 한국전략마케팅학회 19 (19): 171-187, 2011

      15 닐슨, "글로벌 공유 경제에 대한 조사. 조사보고서" 2014

      16 한국리서치, "[컨슈머리포트]중고나라의 사람들"

      17 Belk, Russell W., "You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online" 67 (67): 1595-1600, 2014

      18 Belk, Russell W., "Why not share rather than own?" 611 (611): 126-140, 2007

      19 Lamberton, Cait Poynor, "When is ours better than mine? A framework for understanding and altering participation in commercial sharing systems" 76 (76): 109-125, 2012

      20 Akbar, Payam, "When do materialistic consumers join commercial sharing systems" 69 (69): 4215-4224, 2016

      21 Botsman, Rachel, "What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption" Harper Business 2010

      22 Johnston, Timothy C., "Voluntary simplicity: Definitions and dimensions" 7 (7): 19-36, 2003

      23 Shaw, Deirdre, "Voluntary simplicity and the ethics of consumption" 19 (19): 167-185, 2002

      24 Schultz, P. Wesley, "Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries" 19 (19): 255-265, 1999

      25 Craig‐Lees, Margaret, "Understanding voluntary simplifiers" 19 (19): 187-210, 2002

      26 Phipps, Marcus, "Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: A social cognitive framework" 66 (66): 1227-1234, 2013

      27 Bhattacherjee, Anol, "Understanding information systems continuance: an expectationconfirmation model" 351-370, 2001

      28 McDonald, Seonaidh, "Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers" 23 (23): 515-534, 2006

      29 Rick, Scott I., "Tightwads and spendthrifts" 34 (34): 767-782, 2007

      30 Ajzen, Icek, "The theory of planned behavior" 50 (50): 179-211, 1991

      31 Alcott, Blake, "The sufficiency strategy: Would rich-world frugality lower environmental impact?" 64 (64): 770-786, 2008

      32 Zavestoski, Stephen, "The social-psychological bases of anticonsumption attitudes" 19 (19): 149-165, 2002

      33 Hamari, Juho, "The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption" 67 (67): 2016

      34 PwC, "The sharing economy: How will it disrupt your business? Megatrends: The collisions"

      35 Sack, Danielle, "The sharing economy" Fast Company

      36 Borgmann, Albert, "The moral complexion of consumption" 26 (26): 418-422, 2000

      37 Maslow, Abraham H., "The instinctoid nature of basic needs" 22 (22): 326-347, 1954

      38 Nepomuceno, Marcelo Vinhal, "The impact of materialism and anti-consumption lifestyles on personal debt and account balances" 68 (68): 654-664, 2015

      39 Minton, Ann P., "The effects of environmental concern on environmentally friendly consumer behavior: An exploratory study" 40 (40): 37-48, 1997

      40 Seegebarth, Barbara, "The Sustainability Roots of Anticonsumption Lifestyles and Initial Insights Regarding Their Effects on Consumers' Well-Being" 50 (50): 68-99, 2016

      41 Fornell, Claes, "Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics" 18 (18): 382-388, 1981

      42 Byrne, Barbara M., "Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming" Routledge 2016

      43 Anderson, James C., "Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach" 103 (103): 411-, 1988

      44 Widlok, Thomas, "Sharing by default? Outline of an anthropology of virtue" 4 (4): 53-70, 2004

      45 Ozanne, Lucie K., "Sharing as a Form of Anti-Consumption? An Examination of Toy Library Users" 9 (9): 485-498, 2010

      46 Belk, Russell W., "Sharing" 36 (36): 715-734, 2010

      47 Iyer, Rajesh, "Purpose and object of anti-consumption" 62 (62): 160-168, 2009

      48 Nunnally, Jum C., "Psychometric theory, 226" McGraw-Hill 1967

      49 Havas, "Prosumer report"

      50 Belk, Russell W., "Possessions and the extended self" 15 (15): 139-168, 1988

      51 Bagozzi, Richard P., "On the evaluation of structural equation models" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988

      52 Varman, Rohit, "Nationalism and ideology in an anticonsumption movement" 36 (36): 686-700, 2009

      53 Forman, N., "Mind over money: Curing your financial headaches with money sanity" Doubleday 1987

      54 Thaler, Richard, "Mental accounting and consumer choice" 4 (4): 199-214, 1985

      55 Lastovicka, John L., "Lifestyle of the tight and frugal: Theory and measurement" 26 (26): 85-98, 1999

      56 Arsel, Z., "Hybrid pro-social exchange systems : The case of Freecycle" 39 : 66-67, 2011

      57 Etzioni, Amitai, "From empire to community: A new approach to international relations" Macmillan 2004

      58 Hellwig, Katharina, "Exploring different types of sharing: A proposed segmentation of the market for “sharing” businesses" 32 (32): 891-906, 2015

      59 Culiberg, Barbara, "Examining the effects of utilities and involvement on intentions to engage in digital piracy" 61 (61): 146-154, 2016

      60 Cherrier, Hélène, "Drifting away from excessive consumption: a new social movement based on identity construction" 29 : 245-247, 2002

      61 Kozinets, Robert V., "Don’t read this; or, who cares what the hell anti-consumption is, anyways?" 13 (13): 225-233, 2010

      62 McCracken, Grant David, "Culture and consumption: New approaches to the symbolic character of consumer goods and activities" Indiana University Press 1990

      63 Evans, David, "Consuming conventions: sustainable consumption, ecological citizenship and the worlds of worth" 27 (27): 109-115, 2011

      64 Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, "Consumer file sharing of motion pictures" 71 (71): 1-18, 2007

      65 Balderjahn, Ingo, "Consciousness for fair consumption: conceptualization, scale development and empirical validation" 37 (37): 546-555, 2013

      66 Leipämaa-Leskinen, Hanna, "Conceptualizing nonvoluntary anti-consumption: A practice-based study on market resistance in poor circumstances" 16 (16): 255-278, 2016

      67 Möhlmann, Mareike, "Collaborative consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again" 14 (14): 193-207, 2015

      68 Global Market Insights, "Car Sharing Market Trends - Global 2018-2024 Industry Size Report" 2018

      69 Brown, Kirk Warren, "Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle" 74 (74): 349-368, 2005

      70 Black, Iain R., "Anticonsumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle: daily practices, contextual motivations and subjective values" 9 (9): 437-453, 2010

      71 Lee, Michael S.W., "Anti-consumption, Materialism, and Consumer Well-being" 50 (50): 18-47, 2016

      72 Albinsson, Pia A., "Anti-consumption in East Germany: consumer resistance to hyperconsumption" 9 (9): 412-425, 2010

      73 Lee, Mike, "Anti-consumption and consumer resistance: Concepts, concerns, conflicts, and convergence" 45 (45): 1680-1687, 2011

      74 Lee, Michael S.W., "Anti-consumption and brand avoidance" 62 (62): 169-180, 2009

      75 Lee, Michael S. W., "Anti-consumption : An overview and research agenda" 62 (62): 145-147, 2009

      76 Bray, Jeffery, "An exploratory study into the factors impeding ethical consumption" 98 (98): 597-608, 2011

      77 Pepper, Miriam, "An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours" 33 (33): 126-136, 2009

      78 Iwata, Osamu, "An evaluation of consumerism and lifestyle as correlates of a voluntary simplicity lifestyle" 34 (34): 557-568, 2006

      79 Bardhi, Fleura, "Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing" 39 (39): 881-898, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 1.48 1.67
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.7 1.88 2.351 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼