RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Predicting the size of factory fire damage using public data and machine learning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16916517

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    "Predicting the Size of Factory Fire Damage Using Public Data and Machine Learning” applies a novel approach to minimize severe human casualties and property damage caused by factory fires. Factory fires have a disastrous impact on property once they do occur despite their low frequency. This point highlights the need for effective preemptive strategies to mitigate potential damages. The study aims to overcome the limitations of traditional qualitative assessment methods by developing a quantitative and rapid method for assessing fire risk.
    The methodology involves the use of simple building information and factors that affect fire to develop and validate a machine learning-based framework which predicts the scale of property damage caused by fires. To be specific, public datasets from Korea were collected, preprocessed, and then used to train and validate machine learning algorithms. The study also employed various machine learning models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Decision Trees (DT), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Random Forest (RF), with the RF model being identified as the most suitable for this research.
    The research culminated in predicting the size of property damage caused by fire in 13,032 actual factory buildings across three selected sites. The use of GIS and predictive outcomes also suggests the applicability of the research findings for policy on fire protection.
    This study introduces a new methodology that makes use of limited data on building information and factors that affect fire to predict the size of fire damage accurately and rapidly. It contributes to the field of Architecture research by offering a data-driven, precise, and flexible approach to machine learning models.
    번역하기

    "Predicting the Size of Factory Fire Damage Using Public Data and Machine Learning” applies a novel approach to minimize severe human casualties and property damage caused by factory fires. Factory fires have a disastrous impact on property once the...

    "Predicting the Size of Factory Fire Damage Using Public Data and Machine Learning” applies a novel approach to minimize severe human casualties and property damage caused by factory fires. Factory fires have a disastrous impact on property once they do occur despite their low frequency. This point highlights the need for effective preemptive strategies to mitigate potential damages. The study aims to overcome the limitations of traditional qualitative assessment methods by developing a quantitative and rapid method for assessing fire risk.
    The methodology involves the use of simple building information and factors that affect fire to develop and validate a machine learning-based framework which predicts the scale of property damage caused by fires. To be specific, public datasets from Korea were collected, preprocessed, and then used to train and validate machine learning algorithms. The study also employed various machine learning models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Decision Trees (DT), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Random Forest (RF), with the RF model being identified as the most suitable for this research.
    The research culminated in predicting the size of property damage caused by fire in 13,032 actual factory buildings across three selected sites. The use of GIS and predictive outcomes also suggests the applicability of the research findings for policy on fire protection.
    This study introduces a new methodology that makes use of limited data on building information and factors that affect fire to predict the size of fire damage accurately and rapidly. It contributes to the field of Architecture research by offering a data-driven, precise, and flexible approach to machine learning models.

    더보기

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 논문은 "공공 데이터와 기계 학습을 활용한 공장 화재 피해 규모 예측"이라는 주제로, 공장 화재로 인한 심각한 인명 및 재산 피해를 최소화하기 위한 새로운 방법론을 제시한다. 이 연구는 기존의 정성적 평가 방식의 한계를 넘어서, 정량적이고 신속한 화재 위험도 평가 방법을 개발하고자 하였다. 공장 화재는 발생빈도가 낮음에도 불구하고, 발생하는 경우에는 큰 피해를 가져온다는 점에서 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 이러한 문제점을 인식하고, 공장 화재로 인한 재산 피해를 선제적으로 예측하여 효과적인 대응 방안을 마련하는 것이 본 연구의 주된 목적이다.
    연구의 방법은 간단한 건축 정보와 화재 영향 요인을 활용하여 기계 학습 모델을 통해 화재로 인한 재산 피해의 규모를 예측하는 프레임워크를 제안하고 이를 가시화하여 활용방안까지 제안 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 한국의 공공 데이터셋을 수집하여 데이터전처리 후 기계 학습 알고리즘으로 학습하고 정확도를 검증하는 과정을 진행하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 기계 학습 모델은 인공 신경망(ANN), 의사결정나무(DT), k-최근접 이웃(KNN), 랜덤 포레스트(RF)를 포함하며, 학습결과. RF 모델이 본 연구의 목적에 가장 적합한 것으로 평가되었다.
    마지막으로, 3개의 대상지를 선정하여 실존하는 공장 건축물 13,032건을 대상으로 화재로 인한 재산피해 크기를 예측하였다. 또한 GIS와 예측 결과를 활용하여 정책 제언이 가능하다는 점을 통해 연구결과의 활용성까지 제안하였다.
    이 연구는 건축물 정보, 화재 영향 요인 등 제한된 데이터를 활용하여 화재의 크기를 예측할 수 있는 새로운 방법론을 제시하였다. 이는 데이터 기반의 신속하고 정확한 평가방법론을 제안하고, 기계 학습을 통한 연구 확장성을 확보했다는 점에서 건축연구 분야에 기여할 수 있다.
    번역하기

    본 논문은 "공공 데이터와 기계 학습을 활용한 공장 화재 피해 규모 예측"이라는 주제로, 공장 화재로 인한 심각한 인명 및 재산 피해를 최소화하기 위한 새로운 방법론을 제시한다. 이 연구...

    본 논문은 "공공 데이터와 기계 학습을 활용한 공장 화재 피해 규모 예측"이라는 주제로, 공장 화재로 인한 심각한 인명 및 재산 피해를 최소화하기 위한 새로운 방법론을 제시한다. 이 연구는 기존의 정성적 평가 방식의 한계를 넘어서, 정량적이고 신속한 화재 위험도 평가 방법을 개발하고자 하였다. 공장 화재는 발생빈도가 낮음에도 불구하고, 발생하는 경우에는 큰 피해를 가져온다는 점에서 연구대상으로 선정하였다. 이러한 문제점을 인식하고, 공장 화재로 인한 재산 피해를 선제적으로 예측하여 효과적인 대응 방안을 마련하는 것이 본 연구의 주된 목적이다.
    연구의 방법은 간단한 건축 정보와 화재 영향 요인을 활용하여 기계 학습 모델을 통해 화재로 인한 재산 피해의 규모를 예측하는 프레임워크를 제안하고 이를 가시화하여 활용방안까지 제안 하는 것이다. 이를 위해 한국의 공공 데이터셋을 수집하여 데이터전처리 후 기계 학습 알고리즘으로 학습하고 정확도를 검증하는 과정을 진행하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 기계 학습 모델은 인공 신경망(ANN), 의사결정나무(DT), k-최근접 이웃(KNN), 랜덤 포레스트(RF)를 포함하며, 학습결과. RF 모델이 본 연구의 목적에 가장 적합한 것으로 평가되었다.
    마지막으로, 3개의 대상지를 선정하여 실존하는 공장 건축물 13,032건을 대상으로 화재로 인한 재산피해 크기를 예측하였다. 또한 GIS와 예측 결과를 활용하여 정책 제언이 가능하다는 점을 통해 연구결과의 활용성까지 제안하였다.
    이 연구는 건축물 정보, 화재 영향 요인 등 제한된 데이터를 활용하여 화재의 크기를 예측할 수 있는 새로운 방법론을 제시하였다. 이는 데이터 기반의 신속하고 정확한 평가방법론을 제안하고, 기계 학습을 통한 연구 확장성을 확보했다는 점에서 건축연구 분야에 기여할 수 있다.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • List of Figure ⅳ
    • List of Table ⅵ
    • Abstract ⅸ
    • CHAPTER Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
    • List of Figure ⅳ
    • List of Table ⅵ
    • Abstract ⅸ
    • CHAPTER Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
    • 1.1 Background and Purpose 01
    • 1.1.1 Background 01
    • 1.1.2 Purpose 04
    • 1.2 Scope and Methodology 05
    • 1.2.1 Scope 05
    • 1.2.2 Methodology 06
    • CHAPTER Ⅱ. THEORETICAL LITERATURE REVIEW
    • 2.1 Analysis of Fire-related Risk Factors 08
    • 2.1.1 Definition of Fire Risk 08
    • 2.1.2 Fire Risk Assessment System in Korea 09
    • 2.1.3 Analysis of Previous Studies related to Fire Risk Factors 17
    • 2.1.4 Comprehensive Fire Risk Factors 43
    • 2.2 Analysis of Prior Research on Fire-related AI 48
    • 2.2.1 Analysis of Korean and International Research 48
    • 2.2.2 Analysis of Korean Dissertations 66
    • 2.3 Data Preprocessing Methodology 74
    • 2.4 Sub-conclusion 77
    • CHAPTER Ⅲ. DATA PREPROCESSING AND ANALYSIS
    • 3.1 Data Preprocessing 79
    • 3.1.1 Overview of Preprocessing 79
    • 3.1.2 Data Construction 79
    • 3.1.3 Exploratory Data Analysis 80
    • 3.2 Statistical Analysis 93
    • 3.2.1 Frequency Analysis 93
    • 3.2.2 Regression Analysis 106
    • 3.3 Sub-conclusion 107
    • Chapter Ⅳ. MACHINE LEARNING FOR CLASSIFYING FIRE DAMAGE
    • 4.1 Methodology and Machine Learning Models 109
    • 4.1.1 Methodology 109
    • 4.1.2 Machine Learning Classifier Model Overview 110
    • 4.2 Development of Machine Learning Models using Building Information112
    • 4.3 Development of Machine Learning Models using Building Information
    • and Factors that Affect Fire 119
    • 4.4 Selection of Optimal Model 123
    • 4.5 Sub-conclusion 130
    • CHAPTERⅤ. PREDICTION AND VISUALIZATION OF FIRE PROPERTY DAMAGE
    • 5.1 Application of Prediction Model and Data Collection 132
    • 5.1.1 Application Method 132
    • 5.1.2 Data Collection and Integration 132
    • 5.1.3 Selection of Target Areas 136
    • 5.2 Test Dataset 138
    • 5.2.1 Characteristics of Test Data 138
    • 5.2.2 Setting of Control Variables 147
    • 5.3 Prediction of Property Damage Grades in Factory Fires 148
    • 5.3.1 Prediction Results 148
    • 5.3.2 Grade of Risk Area on GIS 153
    • 5.4 Sub-conclusion 156
    • CHAPTER Ⅵ. CONCLUSION 158
    • Reference 161
    • Abstract(In Korean) 177
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. A physically-based model for urban fire spread, Himoto, K., Tanaka, T., 7th Int. Symposium on Fire Safety Science, , 2002

    2. A heat conduction analog model of urban fire spread, Reitter, T. A, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, , 1983

    3. A review of fire risk assessment methods in urban areas, Xiao-qian, F., (11), 1622, , 2021

    4. Improving urban master plan by fire risk assessment—in, Huang, X., Liu, Y., He, Z., Zhai, G., of Shantou City, China, , 2015

    5. Fire risk assessment in old urban areas: Coimbra old town, Correia, A., Meneses, S., Tavares, P., Correia, J., Santos, C., IFireSS 2017–2nd International Fire Safety Symposium, , 2017

    6. Agent-Based Fire-Spreading Model in a Dense Urban Community, Bongolan, V., Asiddao, M., The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 46, 35-40, , 2021

    7. Electrical fire prediction model study using machine learning, Moon, G. G., Hwang, D. H., Park, S. J., Ko, K. S., 11(6), 703-710, , 2018

    8. FireCast: Leveraging deep learning to predict wildfire spread, Dan, E., David, R., Anna, H., Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Macao, China, 10–16, , 2019

    9. Firecast: Leveraging Deep Learning to Predict Wildfire Spread, Radke, D., Ellsworth, D., Hessler, A., Paper presented at the IJCAI, , 2019

    10. A novel kNN algorithm with data-driven k parameter computation, Deng, X., Zong, M., Deng, Z., Zhang, S., Cheng, D., 109, 44–54, , 2018

    1. A physically-based model for urban fire spread, Himoto, K., Tanaka, T., 7th Int. Symposium on Fire Safety Science, , 2002

    2. A heat conduction analog model of urban fire spread, Reitter, T. A, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, , 1983

    3. A review of fire risk assessment methods in urban areas, Xiao-qian, F., (11), 1622, , 2021

    4. Improving urban master plan by fire risk assessment—in, Huang, X., Liu, Y., He, Z., Zhai, G., of Shantou City, China, , 2015

    5. Fire risk assessment in old urban areas: Coimbra old town, Correia, A., Meneses, S., Tavares, P., Correia, J., Santos, C., IFireSS 2017–2nd International Fire Safety Symposium, , 2017

    6. Agent-Based Fire-Spreading Model in a Dense Urban Community, Bongolan, V., Asiddao, M., The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 46, 35-40, , 2021

    7. Electrical fire prediction model study using machine learning, Moon, G. G., Hwang, D. H., Park, S. J., Ko, K. S., 11(6), 703-710, , 2018

    8. FireCast: Leveraging deep learning to predict wildfire spread, Dan, E., David, R., Anna, H., Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Macao, China, 10–16, , 2019

    9. Firecast: Leveraging Deep Learning to Predict Wildfire Spread, Radke, D., Ellsworth, D., Hessler, A., Paper presented at the IJCAI, , 2019

    10. A novel kNN algorithm with data-driven k parameter computation, Deng, X., Zong, M., Deng, Z., Zhang, S., Cheng, D., 109, 44–54, , 2018

    11. A spread-of-fire model for a large-scale urban fire simulation, Kobayashi, T., Mizukami, Y., Ikaruga, S., Nishikawa, H., Tadamura, K., Ohgai, A., Proc. of IWAIT, 346-350, , 2014

    12. Application of artificial neural networks in civil engineering, Marijana, L., Ana, T.-G., Milos, K., Meri, C., 21, 1353 –1359, , 2014

    13. Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management, Davison, B. D., Sun, W., Bocchini, P., 103, 2631–2689, , 2020

    14. Development of Fire Risk Assessment Index of Traditional Market, Kim, T., Lee, J., Lee, K., 20, 153-160, , 2020

    15. Study on Urban Fire Risk Assessment Index System for Smart Cities, Sun, T., Lin, M., Fang, H., Liu, X., Wu, J., Sun, J., Paper presented at the 2019 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Electronics Technology (ICET), , 2019

    16. Forecasting Fire Risk Using Simulation Based on Bayesian Inference, Koo, S. H., 22(2), 189-195, , 2015

    17. Urban fire station layout assessment technology based on fire risk, Jun-jie, H., Jun-tao, Y., Fire Science and Technology,40(1), 130, , 2021

    18. A comparative study on decision tree and random forest using R Tool, Prajwala, T. R., 4, 196–199, , 2015

    19. A mathematical model of an urban fire-spread and computer simulation, Weizhang, H., Suochun, Z., Guangyao, L., Yiren, W., (1), 9, , 1993

    20. An Analysis of the Fire Jurisdiction in Seoul using Voronoi polygons, Kim, D. S., Yoon, S. H., 31(5), 865-875, , 2020

    21. Development and validation of a physics-based urban fire spread model, Tanaka, T., Himoto, K., (7), 477-494, , 2008

    22. Recognition of the Risk of Heat Waves as a Disaster and Tasks for Seoul, Baek, J. S., Han, Y. G., Seoul Health Foundation. Seoul Health Air Health Policy Trends, 45, 1–9, , 2022

    23. A Model for the Fire-Fighting Activity of Local Residents in Urban Fires, Himoto, K., Tanaka, T., 54, 154-166, , 2012

    24. Machine learning method for image recognition-based fire detection system, Xia, X., Wan, X., Cai, J., Yan, K., Han, J., Zhang, B., Proceedings of the 6th Information Technology and Mechatronics Engineering Conference (ITOEC), Chongqing, China, 2022 IEEE Publications: Piscataway, NJ, USA, , 2022

    25. Effects of Climate Change on Natural-Caused Fire Activity in Western U. S., Arabi, M., Warziniack, T., Heidari, H., National Forests. Atmosphere, 12, 981, , 2021

    26. Real-Time Forecast of Compartment Fire and Flashover Based on Deep Learning, Huang, X., Wang, Z., Wong, H. Y., Zhang, T., Tam, W. C., Xiao, F., 130, 103579, , 2022

    27. Urban fire risk assessment and planning response based on multi-source data, Wang, A., Huang, C., Yu, H., Zhang, Q., Lu, L., ,31(3), 148-155, , 2021

    28. Deep-Learning Based Real-Time Fire Detection Using Object Tracking Algorithm, Na, Y., Hyun, D., Park, D., Park, J., Lee, S. H., 27(1), 1-8, , 2022

    29. Determination of Fire Risk Assessment Indicators for Building using Big Data, Ok, C. Y., An, J. H., Choi, Y. J., Joo, H. J., 22(3), 281-291, , 2022

    30. Fire risk prediction using building information and machine learning methods, Kim, B. T., Yoon, D. W., Lee, J., Li, X., Pak, T. Y., Hwang, H., In Advances in Information and Communication; FICC 2022; Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems Volume; Arai, K.Ed) Springer: Cham, Switzerland; Volume 438, pp. 22–30, , 2022

    31. Forest Fire Occurrence Prediction in China Based on Machine Learning Methods, Chen, S., Zhao, Z., Feng, Z., Feng, Z., Zhang, H., Li, Y., Pang, Y., 14, 5546, , 2022

    32. Fire Risk Assessment in Dense Urban Areas Using Information Fusion Techniques, Maleki, J., van L. Genderen, J., Masoumi, Z., ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(12), 579, , 2019

    33. Precise risk assessment for fire and explosion in the urban regeneration area, KIM, Y., Ok, S., Hong, J.-W., Byun, G., Choi, Y., Park, D., Kim, S., The 33rd KKHTCNN Symposium on Civil Engineering, , 2022

    34. Guide for climate-resilient cities: An urban critical infrastructures approach, Labaka, L., Hernantes, H., Lomba-Fernández, L. F., Sustainability, 11(17), 4727, , 2019

    35. Policy Suggestions for Minimizing the Dead Zone of the Disaster Safety in Korea, Lee, C. K., Kim, S., 16(3), 611-625, , 2020

    36. A Study on City Fire Disaster using GIS - Using Kangnam District as an Example -, Choi, W. H., 34, 49-66, , 1999

    37. Agent-based modeling of the spread of fire in urban settlements in the Philippines, Bardeloza, D. K. D., Buenaventura, A., Tangonan, G. L., Calgo, C. J., Libatique, N. J. C., Proceedings of the Samahang Pisika ng Pilipinas, , 2020

    38. Predicting transient building fire based on external smoke images and deep learning, Wu, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Z., Huang, X., 47, 103823, , 2022

    39. The Risk Assessment of the Fire Occurrence According to Urban Facilities in Jinju-si, Won, T. H., Bae, G. H., Yoo, H. H., 24(1), 43-50, , 2016

    40. A Study on the Risks Factors of Fire Occurrence and Expansion for Traditional Markets, Kim, J. G., Park, C. I., Jeong, J. U., Kim, S. G., 17(1), 60-67, , 2021

    41. Activation functions: Comparison of trends in practice and research for deep learning, Ijomah, W., Nwankpa, C. E., Gachagan, A., Marshall, S., In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Sciences and Technology, Jamshoro, Pakistan, December 17 –19, 2020; pp. 124–133, , 2020

    42. An Intelligent Fire Learning and Detection System Using Convolutional Neural Networks, Jeon, M., Choi, K., Korea Information Processing Society (KIPS) Transactions on Software and Data Engineering (KTSDE), 5(11), 607-614, , 2016

    43. Study on Urban Fire Station Planning Based on Fire Risk Assessment and GIS Technology, Cheng, X., Li, Y., Huang, Y., Pan, Y., Dong, X., Procedia Engineering, 211, 124-130, , 2018

    44. Environmental Risk Assessment Using Neural Network in Liquefied Petroleum Gas Terminal, Kanidarapu, N., Gabhane, L. R., 11, 348, , 2023

    45. Fire Risk Assessment of Electric bicycles Charging Facilities in Old Urban Communities, Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Yu, Z., Power System and Green Energy ConferencePSGEC, , 2022

    46. A Study on Convergence of Attribute Information of Building Objects for Fire Prediction, Ko, K. S., Cho, J. P., Ko, H. S., Kim, H. J., Chillo, G., 45(7), 1219-1227, , 2020

    47. Simulation-Based Quantitative Risk Assessment of Fire in Urban Electrical Cable Tunnels, Lu, S., Zhang, J., Fang, H., Huang, D., Lo, S., 2019 9th International Conference on Fire Science and Fire Protection EngineeringICFSFPE, , 2019

    48. Research on Fire Risk Assessment and Control Methods for Urban Bridges Based on Fuzzy-Bn, Yang, Z., Li, Z., Fan, Y., 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics AutomationICMTMA, , 2020

    49. A Prediction Model of Casualties Based on Machine Learning for Selection of Fire Scenario, Lee, W., Park, B., Lee, Y., Seo, D., Kim, J., Song, H., 21, 165-173, , 2021

    50. Analysis of property damage in case of fire according to factory building characteristics, Kim, S., Lee, J., Sohn D., Park, C., 23(2). 150-151, , 2023

    51. Interpretable boosting tree ensemble method for multisource building fire loss prediction, Wang, N., Xu, Y., Wang, S., 225, 108587, , 2022

    52. Mapping Forest Fire Risk Zones Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Hunan Province, China, Feng, Z., Tan, C., 15, 6292, , 2023

    53. Fire Risk Assessment Models Using Statistical Machine Learning and Optimized Risk Indexing, Jun, S., Choi, M. Y., 10(12), 4199, , 2020

    54. Simulation model of evacuation behavior in the fire-spread urban area following earthquake, Aoki, Y., Osaragi, T., Hashimoto, K., Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering; Japan, 440, , 1992

    55. Smart performance-based design for building fire safety: Prediction of smoke motion via AI, Su, L., Wu, X., Zhang, X., Huang, X., 43, 102529, , 2021

    56. A Study on the Residential Evacuation Safety Assessment Method Based on the Concept of Risk, Michigoe, Y., Ph. D. Thesis, University of Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan, , 2012

    57. Characterization of Two Main Forest Cover Loss Transitions in North Korea from 1990 to 2020, Zhu, W., Zhu, J., Lee, D. K., Yin, Z., Cui, G., Jin, Y., 14, 1966, , 2023

    58. Cross-validation for imbalanced datasets: Avoiding overoptimistic and overfitting approaches, Miriam, S. S., Jastin, P. S., Pedro, H. A., Helder, A., & Joao, S., 13, 59– 76, , 2018

    59. Risk Assessment of Urban Fire— Method for the Analysis and Management of Existing Buildings, Gonçalves, M. C., Correia, A., Sustainable Construction: Building Performance Simulation and Asset and Maintenance Management, 71-91, , 2016

    60. Evaluation of the Spatial Distribution of Predictors of Fire Regimes in China from 2003 to 2016, Li, K., Yu, Y., Liu, Z., Jiao, K., Fletcher, T. L., Wang, W., Su, J., Lü, Q., 15, 4946, , 2023

    61. Fire Risk Assessment of Urban Utility Tunnels Based on Improved Cloud Model and Evidence Theory, Yuan, Q., Wang, Y., Niu, Q., Hu, Y., (4), 2204, , 2023

    62. Development of Automatic Modeling System for Simulation of Urban Spreading Fire in an Earthquake, Sawada, T., Terada, K., Tsujihara, O., , 297-307, , 2007

    63. Human Factors in the Model of Urban Fire Spread in Madrid (Spain) Focused on the Poor Population, Fernández, M., Caro, R., Cantizano, A., Ayala, P., 14(8), 4486, , 2022

    64. Modelling of wildland-urban interface fire spread with the heterogeneous cellular automata model, Fang, L., Wang, F., Meng, Q., Zheng, X., Jiang, W., Li, Z., Qiao, X., , 104895, , 2021

    65. AI-Based Cognitive Framework for Evaluating Response of Concrete Structures in Extreme Conditions, Naser, M. Z., Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 81, 437-449, , 2019

    66. Prediction Model of Borehole Spontaneous Combustion Based on Machine Learning and Its Application, Qi, Y., Wang, W., Cui, X., Liang, R., Xue, K., Fire, 6, 357, , 2023

    67. Urban fire spread modelling and simulation using cellular automaton with extreme learning machine, Patac, J., Vicente, A., The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences,42, 319-326, , 2019

    68. A Study on the Risk Assessment Using Simulation and Case Study of Urban Fire - Focusing on Market -, Kwon, Y. J., Shin, Y. C., Koo, I. H., Fire Science and Engineering, 25(6), 1-7, , 2011

    69. Real-Time Prediction of Structural Fire Responses: A Finite Element-Based Machine-Learning Approach, Hsu, S.-C., Ye, Z., Wei, H.-H., Automation in Construction, 136, 104165, , 2022

    70. A novel hyperparameter-free approach to decision tree construction that avoids overfitting by design, Mancuso, V., Fernandez Anta, A., Casari, P., Garcia Leiva, R., IEEE Access, 7, 99978–99987, , 2019

    71. Smart detection of fire source in tunnel based on the numerical database and artificial intelligence, Huang, X., Xiao, F., Li, A., Park, Y., Wu, X., Usmani, A., Fire Technology, 57, 657–682, , 2021

    72. Cellular Automata Modeling of Fire Spread Based on Post-Earthquake Fire Risk Assessment of Urban Area, Zhao, J. P., Meng, X. J., Advanced Materials Research,368, 732-738, , 2012

    73. Development of Fire Risk Prediction Model in Manufacturing Facilities Using Artificial Neural Network, Choi, W. I., Kim, Y. S., Jang, D. W., Jung, Y. S., Kim, G. H., 17, 161-167, , 2017

    74. Physics-based modeling of fire spread in densely-built urban area and its application to risk assessment, Himoto, K., Tanaka, T., Monografías de la Real Academia de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas, Químicas y Naturales de Zaragoza(34), 87-104, , 2010

    75. Pohang City Fire Vulnerable Area Prediction and Fire Damage Rating Measurement by Administrative District, Kim, H. J., Lim, J. H., 21(4), 166-176, , 2021

    76. Parametric study of urban fire spread using an urban fire simulation model with fire department suppression, Li, S., Davidson, R. A., , 217-225, , 2013

    77. Analysis of Fire Prediction Performance of Image Classification Models based on Convolutional Neural Network, Kong, M. S., Min, S. H., Roh, J. H., Fire Science and Engineering, 36(6), 70-77, , 2022

    78. Empirical Application for the Urban Disaster Risk Assessment: Fire, Facility and Escape Cases in Cheongju City, Baek, K. Y., Lee, M. H., Kim, T. H., Ryu, E. L., Hwang, J. H., Hwang, H. Y., Park, B. H., 1(2), 123-137., , 2001

    79. Fire risk assessment of historic urban Aggregates: an application to the Yungay neighborhood in Santiago, Chile, Rosas, J., de la Llera, J., Juliá, P. B., Palazzi, N., Monsalve, M., Ferreira, T., 103550, , 2023

    80. Improved Classification of Fire Accidents and Analysis of Periodicity for Prediction of Critical Fire Accidents, Kim, C. W., Shin, D., 24(1), 56-65, , 2020

    81. Improving the precision-recall trade-off in undersampling-based binary text categorization using unanimity rule, Erenel, Z., Altinçay, H., Neural Computing and Applications, 22, 83–100, , 2013

    82. Development of a data-based machine learning model for classifying and predicting property damage caused by fire, Sohn, D., Park, C., Lee, J., Shin, J., Lee, J., 13(21), 11866, , 2023

    83. Risk Analysis Model That Uses Machine Learning to Predict the Likelihood of a Fire Occurring at a Given Property, Surya, L., International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), ISSN, 2320-882, , 2017

    84. Risk analysis model that uses machine learning to predict the likelihood of a fire occurring at A given property, Lakshmisri, S., International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT), 5, 959–962, , 2017

    85. Multi-Stage Feature Selection Based Intelligent Classifier for Classification of Incipient Stage Fire in Building, Andrew, A.,, Saad, S. M. &, Shakaff, A. Y. M., Melvin, A.,, Zakaria, A.,, 16(1), 31, , 2016

    86. A Study on the Development of a Fire Site Risk Prediction Model Based on Initial Information using Big Data Analysis, Jo, B., Kim, D. H., 17(2), 245-253, , 2021

    87. Using Lidar-Derived Vegetation Profiles to Predict Time since Fire in an Oak Scrub Landscape in East-Central Florida, Angelo, J. J., Duncan, B. W., Weishampel, J. F., 2, 514–525, , 2010

    88. A Study on the Spatial Characteristics of Urban Fire and Its Relationship with the Spatiality of Urban Decline in Seoul, Kang, J. Y., Kim, S. J., Hwang, J. A., 10(3), 1-20, , 2020

    89. Reducing wooden structure and wildland-urban interface fire disaster risk through dynamic risk assessment and management, Velle, L. G., Metallinou, M. M., Log, T., Vandvik, V., Applied System Innovation,3(1), 16, , 2020

    90. Evaluation of urban disaster for Disaster Prevention and Public Safety Using Transformation Topsis Model and Maxmin Model, Yoon, S. B., Ryu, T. C., & Kim, H. B, 9(3), 1457-1469, , 2007

    91. Fusion of Remotely-Sensed Fire-Related Indices for Wildfire Prediction through the Contribution of Artificial Intelligence, Sakellariou, S., Ntinopoulos, N., Sfougaris, A., Christopoulou, O., 15, 11527, , 2023

    92. Urban Spatial Risk Assessment of Fire from Fueling Stations on Buildings Case Study: Lubaga Division, Kampala City, Uganda, Wadembere, I., Apaco, J., 8(01), 57, , 2020

    93. Vulnerability analysis of fire evacuation at urban kampong using space syntax method, Penggilingan Jakarta as a case study, Rosyidah, A., Tambunan, L., Nurdini, A., IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1058, 012008, , 2022

    94. Analytical Study on the Prediction of Fire Evacuation Time in Large Complex Buildings Using the Ensemble Learning Technique, Kim, H. K., Lee, D., 22(5), 9-17, , 2022

    95. Modeling forest fire risk based on GIS-based analytical hierarchy process and statistical analysis in the Mediterranean region, Ömer, K., Fatih, S., 68, 101537, , 2022

    96. Enhancing Safety and Efficiency in Firefighting Operations via Deep Learning and Temperature Forecasting Modeling in Autonomous Unit, Ishola, A. A., Valles, D., 23, 4628, , 2023

    97. Developing a risk assessment approach for forest fire at the rural-urban interface: potential of the wildfire threat analysis framework, McMorrow, J., Kazmierczak, A., Aylen, J., Final report, , 2014

    98. Fire Risk Assessment on Wildland–Urban Interface and Adjoined Urban Areas: Estimation Vegetation Ignitability by Artificial Neural Network, Wittenberg, L., Brook, A., Kutiel, H., Mahamed, M., Fire,5(6), 184, , 2022

    99. Machine Learning for Predicting Forest Fire Occurrence in Changsha: An Innovative Investigation into the Introduction of a Forest Fuel Factor, Wu, X., Tan, S., Zhang, G., Yang, Y., Pang, Z., Yang, Z., 15, 4208, , 2023

    100. A simple model for predicting the smoke spread length during a fire in a shallow urban road tunnel with roof openings under natural ventilation, Tanaka, F., Yoshida, K., Ueda, K., Ji, J., , 103106, , 2021

    101. Post-earthquake fire risk assessment of historic urban areas: A scenario-based analysis applied to the Historic City Centre of Leiria, Portugal, Juliá, P. B., Ferreira, T. M., Rodrigues, H., , 102287, , 2021

    102. Assessing Fire Risk in Wildland–Urban Interface Regions Using a Machine Learning Method and GIS data: The Example of Istanbul’s European Side, Akpinar, K., Kocer, A., Akçal, A. N., Yilmaz, İ., Aksoy, E., 6, 408, , 2023

    103. A High-Resolution Spatial Distribution-Based Integration Machine Learning Algorithm for Urban Fire Risk Assessment: A Case Study in Chengdu, China, Hao, Y., Chen, J., Wang, J., Li, M., Li, X., 12, 404, , 2023

    104. A Coupled Framework of Cellular Automata-based Fire Spread Model and Water Distribution System for Dynamic Simulation of Urban Conflagration Events, Kanta, L., & Giacomoni, M., World Environmental and Water Resources Congress, , 2013

    105. Assessment of k-Nearest Neighbor and Random Forest Classifiers for Mapping Forest Fire Areas in Central Portugal Using Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and Terra Imagery, Pacheco, A. d. P., Ruiz-Armenteros, A. M., Junior, J. A. d. S., Henriques, R. F. F., 13, 1345, , 2021

    106. The Spatiotemporal Changing Dynamics of Miombo Deforestation and Illegal Human Activities for Forest Fire in Kundelungu National Park, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Sikuzani, Y. U., Mukenza, M. M., Malaisse, F., Kaseya, P. K., & Bogaert, J, 6, 174, , 2023

    107. Simulation models for fire spread in urban area and their characteristics from urban structure point of view; Shigaichi kenchikubutsu no kosei to ensho jokyo no simulation, Itoigawa, E., Anzen Kogaku (Journal of Japan Society for Safety Engineering),36, , 1997

    108. Development of a fire prediction model at the urban planning stage: Ordinary least squares regression analysis of the area of urban land use and fire damage data in South Korea, Bae, Y., Lim, D., Hong, W., Na, W., 136, 103761, , 2023

    109. Analyzing the Measures of Decreasing Disaster Damage Through Assessing the Risk of Built Up Area - Focused on built-up areas (Sujeong-gu, jungwon-gu) of Seongnam City in Korea -, Lee, J. H., Park, C. U., 45(6), 191-208, , 2010

    110. Fire Risk Assessment of Japanese Traditional Wooden District Based on Physics-Based Model for Urban Fire Spread a Study on Effectiveness of Fire Fighting Activities of Community Residents in Kyoto Sanneizaka District, Akimoto, Y., Ikuyo, K., Hokugo, A., Sugimoto, R., Himoto, K., Tanaka, T., 7, 110, , 2007

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼