RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재 국가R&D연구논문

      도시철도 철도안전사상사고 원인분석 및 예방대응체계구축 = A Factor Analysis of Urban Railway Casualty Accidents and Establishment of Preventive Response Systems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101662761

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Since the opening of Seoul Subway Line #1 in 1974, the number of passengers has been increasing. The possibility for passenger's accidents in railway stations has also increased. In order to decrease these kind of accidents, railway operation systems have been automated. Nevertheless, the possibility of a casualty accident in railway stations remains. This study analyzed the type of casualty accidents, casualty accidents by age, sex, pedestrian facility, and passenger type based on the internal data of Seoul Metro. The causes of casualty accidents are also found out. Finally, the establishment of railway safety education program and railway safety experience center are suggested in order to prevent the urban railway casualty accident in advance at railway stations.
      번역하기

      Since the opening of Seoul Subway Line #1 in 1974, the number of passengers has been increasing. The possibility for passenger's accidents in railway stations has also increased. In order to decrease these kind of accidents, railway operation systems ...

      Since the opening of Seoul Subway Line #1 in 1974, the number of passengers has been increasing. The possibility for passenger's accidents in railway stations has also increased. In order to decrease these kind of accidents, railway operation systems have been automated. Nevertheless, the possibility of a casualty accident in railway stations remains. This study analyzed the type of casualty accidents, casualty accidents by age, sex, pedestrian facility, and passenger type based on the internal data of Seoul Metro. The causes of casualty accidents are also found out. Finally, the establishment of railway safety education program and railway safety experience center are suggested in order to prevent the urban railway casualty accident in advance at railway stations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임광균, "철도사고유형분류 및 표준화 방안" 대한토목학회 26 (26): 133-140, 2006

      2 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Railway Safety Performance Report" 2013

      3 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Railroad accident and Emergency Response Management System Reports" 2008

      4 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Rail Safety Statistics Report" 2013

      5 Korea Consumer Agency, "Facilities in Urban Rail Safety Survey Report" 2010

      6 "DAEGU SAFETY THEME PARK"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Build Railroad accident risk analysis and evaluation system Report" 2011

      1 임광균, "철도사고유형분류 및 표준화 방안" 대한토목학회 26 (26): 133-140, 2006

      2 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Railway Safety Performance Report" 2013

      3 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Railroad accident and Emergency Response Management System Reports" 2008

      4 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, "Rail Safety Statistics Report" 2013

      5 Korea Consumer Agency, "Facilities in Urban Rail Safety Survey Report" 2010

      6 "DAEGU SAFETY THEME PARK"

      7 Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs, "Build Railroad accident risk analysis and evaluation system Report" 2011

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      국가 R&D 연구 과제 정보

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.4 0.4 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.38 0.35 0.707 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼