RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      국민학교 신구체육교육과정에 대한 비교연구-5,6학년의 영역 및 학습지도 내용을 중심으로- = A Comparatibe Study of the New and the Old Curriculums for Physical Education-with speciial reference to the area and the Conent of the Curriculums-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106947226

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A. Purpose of the Study
      Elementary school curriculum was revised in February 1973. The revised curriculum
      lor physical eduucation places emphasis on physical exercise forms in comparison
      with the old curriculum emphasized on play. So the new and the old curriculums for
      physical education are different in many respects including the area and the content
      of learning.
      This study is to identify the problems of physical education and to exolore the
      possible ways of improving them by analyzing the area arid the content of learning
      of both the new and the old curriculums with special reference to fifth and sixth
      grade curriclums in elementary school.
      B. Method of Study
      In setting up the theoretical framework for physical education, the following are referred
      in the main : an explanation of the physical education curriculum in elementary school;
      the new curriculum for physical education} a series of teaching physical education in
      elementary school.
      The questionnares were administered to a sample of 233 master teachers of physical
      education from elementary schools in Chung Nam Province. Forty master teachers were
      interviewed.
      C. Findings of the Study
      1. There are many differences between the area and the unit in the content of learning
      of the new and the old curriculums.
      2. Teachers should have professonal knowledge and skill in teaching, and are feeling
      mental obligation because of the differences in the content. So departmental system for
      physical education is needed.
      3. Regimented teaching, group teaching and individual learning in the teaching methods,
      should be respectively applied according to the content of learning.
      4. The utilizaton of physical education terminology is increased in the various area
      and the amount of physical exercise is emphasized in the content. So professionalism in
      teaching physical education is required.
      5. The term play used in the old curriculum is changed to physical exercise form in the
      new curriculum.
      6. The understanding of the strengths and the weaknesses of the new and the old
      curriculums will give an opportunity to explore effective teaching methods.
      D. Recommendations
      1. Departmental system for physical education should be used at least in the fourth-
      grades and above to solve the above-mentiontioned problems,
      2. More opportunities for inservice education should be given to enhance the level of
      professional knowlebge on the part of master teachers of ph ysical education.
      3. Explanations of physical education terms should be add ed to the appendix of physical
      education text books for the effective utilization of the terms.
      번역하기

      A. Purpose of the Study Elementary school curriculum was revised in February 1973. The revised curriculum lor physical eduucation places emphasis on physical exercise forms in comparison with the old curriculum emphasized on play. So the new and the...

      A. Purpose of the Study
      Elementary school curriculum was revised in February 1973. The revised curriculum
      lor physical eduucation places emphasis on physical exercise forms in comparison
      with the old curriculum emphasized on play. So the new and the old curriculums for
      physical education are different in many respects including the area and the content
      of learning.
      This study is to identify the problems of physical education and to exolore the
      possible ways of improving them by analyzing the area arid the content of learning
      of both the new and the old curriculums with special reference to fifth and sixth
      grade curriclums in elementary school.
      B. Method of Study
      In setting up the theoretical framework for physical education, the following are referred
      in the main : an explanation of the physical education curriculum in elementary school;
      the new curriculum for physical education} a series of teaching physical education in
      elementary school.
      The questionnares were administered to a sample of 233 master teachers of physical
      education from elementary schools in Chung Nam Province. Forty master teachers were
      interviewed.
      C. Findings of the Study
      1. There are many differences between the area and the unit in the content of learning
      of the new and the old curriculums.
      2. Teachers should have professonal knowledge and skill in teaching, and are feeling
      mental obligation because of the differences in the content. So departmental system for
      physical education is needed.
      3. Regimented teaching, group teaching and individual learning in the teaching methods,
      should be respectively applied according to the content of learning.
      4. The utilizaton of physical education terminology is increased in the various area
      and the amount of physical exercise is emphasized in the content. So professionalism in
      teaching physical education is required.
      5. The term play used in the old curriculum is changed to physical exercise form in the
      new curriculum.
      6. The understanding of the strengths and the weaknesses of the new and the old
      curriculums will give an opportunity to explore effective teaching methods.
      D. Recommendations
      1. Departmental system for physical education should be used at least in the fourth-
      grades and above to solve the above-mentiontioned problems,
      2. More opportunities for inservice education should be given to enhance the level of
      professional knowlebge on the part of master teachers of ph ysical education.
      3. Explanations of physical education terms should be add ed to the appendix of physical
      education text books for the effective utilization of the terms.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 緒 論 1
      • II. 理論的背景 4
      • III. 領域 및 學習指導内容分析의 基礎 6
      • IV. 領域(單元, 教材) 및 時間配當基準에 關한 分析結果 12
      • V. 學習指導内容의 分析結果 17
      • I. 緒 論 1
      • II. 理論的背景 4
      • III. 領域 및 學習指導内容分析의 基礎 6
      • IV. 領域(單元, 教材) 및 時間配當基準에 關한 分析結果 12
      • V. 學習指導内容의 分析結果 17
      • VI. 結論 및 提言 35
      • 參考文獻 36
      • Abstract 37
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼