RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Korean L2 Overpassivization of Unaccusative Verbs: Focusing on the Relative Effects of Linguistic and Cognitive Factors

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103970248

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper examines how linguistic and cognitive factors play roles in Korean learners’ overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs. It has been reported in L2 literature that overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs are prevalent among Korean learners as well as learners from various L1 backgrounds (Balcom, 1997; Hwang, 1999, 2001; Ju, 2000; Oshita, 2000, 2001; Yip, 1994, 1995; Zobl, 1989). The causes of this phenomenon have been analyzed predominantly from the syntactic view by many researchers (Balcom, 1997; Oshita, 2000; Yip, 1994; Zobl, 1989). However, as different error patterns have been observed among different unaccusative verbs in terms of overpassivization in recent studies, SLA researchers have tried to relate this phenomenon to diverse factors (Croft, 1995; Ju, Montrul, 1999, 2000, 2001; No & Chung, 2006). In this regard, this study chose to examine the following three factors as major sources affecting overpassivization in the L2 literature: verb alternation, subject animacy, and context type representing not only linguistic but also cognitive fields. In addition to analyzing the main effects of these factors on Korean L2 learners’ overpassivization, this study also attempts to examine if there exist any relative effects among them. A grammaticality judgment task was administered to a group of 70 Korean college participants. The results of the GJT showed that all of the three factors above had considerable effects on overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs by Korean L2 learners. When d­values of the three factors were calculated to compare their relative effects, the context type factor was found to have the strongest effect.
      번역하기

      This paper examines how linguistic and cognitive factors play roles in Korean learners’ overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs. It has been reported in L2 literature that overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs are prevalent amo...

      This paper examines how linguistic and cognitive factors play roles in Korean learners’ overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs. It has been reported in L2 literature that overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs are prevalent among Korean learners as well as learners from various L1 backgrounds (Balcom, 1997; Hwang, 1999, 2001; Ju, 2000; Oshita, 2000, 2001; Yip, 1994, 1995; Zobl, 1989). The causes of this phenomenon have been analyzed predominantly from the syntactic view by many researchers (Balcom, 1997; Oshita, 2000; Yip, 1994; Zobl, 1989). However, as different error patterns have been observed among different unaccusative verbs in terms of overpassivization in recent studies, SLA researchers have tried to relate this phenomenon to diverse factors (Croft, 1995; Ju, Montrul, 1999, 2000, 2001; No & Chung, 2006). In this regard, this study chose to examine the following three factors as major sources affecting overpassivization in the L2 literature: verb alternation, subject animacy, and context type representing not only linguistic but also cognitive fields. In addition to analyzing the main effects of these factors on Korean L2 learners’ overpassivization, this study also attempts to examine if there exist any relative effects among them. A grammaticality judgment task was administered to a group of 70 Korean college participants. The results of the GJT showed that all of the three factors above had considerable effects on overpassivization with English unaccusative verbs by Korean L2 learners. When d­values of the three factors were calculated to compare their relative effects, the context type factor was found to have the strongest effect.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Balcom,P, "Why is this happened?: Passive morphology and unaccusativity" 13 (13): 1-9, 1997

      2 Oshita,H, "What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of “passive” unaccusatives in L2 English" 16 (16): 293-324, 2000

      3 Kim, Jung-Tae, "Unaccusativity and L2 Passive Construction" 한국영어어문교육학회 12 (12): 69-89, 2006

      4 Oshita,H, "The Unaccusative Trap in Second Language Acquisition" 23 (23): 279-304, 2001

      5 Kondo,T, "Overpassivization in second language acquisition" 43 : 129-161, 2005

      6 Ju,M.K, "Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse" 22 : 85-111, 2000

      7 No, GyeongHee, "Multiple Effects and the Learnability of English Unaccusatives" 한국영어교육학회 61 (61): 19-39, 2006

      8 Croft,W, "Modern syntactic typology, In Approaches to language typology" Clarendon Press 1995

      9 Kim,H.S, "Lecture note on the course of syntax and semantics"

      10 Hirakawa,M, "L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs by speakers of English, In The acquisition of Japanese as a second language" John Benjamins 89-113, 1999

      1 Balcom,P, "Why is this happened?: Passive morphology and unaccusativity" 13 (13): 1-9, 1997

      2 Oshita,H, "What is happened may not be what appears to be happening: A corpus study of “passive” unaccusatives in L2 English" 16 (16): 293-324, 2000

      3 Kim, Jung-Tae, "Unaccusativity and L2 Passive Construction" 한국영어어문교육학회 12 (12): 69-89, 2006

      4 Oshita,H, "The Unaccusative Trap in Second Language Acquisition" 23 (23): 279-304, 2001

      5 Kondo,T, "Overpassivization in second language acquisition" 43 : 129-161, 2005

      6 Ju,M.K, "Overpassivization errors by second language learners: The effect of conceptualizable agents in discourse" 22 : 85-111, 2000

      7 No, GyeongHee, "Multiple Effects and the Learnability of English Unaccusatives" 한국영어교육학회 61 (61): 19-39, 2006

      8 Croft,W, "Modern syntactic typology, In Approaches to language typology" Clarendon Press 1995

      9 Kim,H.S, "Lecture note on the course of syntax and semantics"

      10 Hirakawa,M, "L2 acquisition of Japanese unaccusative verbs by speakers of English, In The acquisition of Japanese as a second language" John Benjamins 89-113, 1999

      11 Hwang J.B, "L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs under implicit and explicit learning conditions" 54 (54): 145-176, 1999

      12 Burzio,L, "Italian syntax: A government­binding approach" Reidel 1986

      13 Haegeman,L, "Introduction to government & binding theory" Blackwell 1994

      14 Yip,V, "Interlanguage and learnability: From Chinese to English" Benjamins 1995

      15 Perlmutter,D, "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis" 157-189, 1978

      16 Yip,V, "Grammatical consciousness­raising and learnability, In Perspectives on pedagogical grammar" Cambridge University Press 23-139, 1994

      17 Hwang J. B, "Focus on form and the L2 learning of English unaccusative verbs" 56 (56): 111-133, 2001

      18 김은희, "Difficulty Hierarchy of English Unaccusative Verbs for Korean Learners" 한국외국어교육학회 11 (11): 101-123, 2004

      19 Harper Collins Publishers, "Collins COBUILD English Dictionary for Advanced Learners" Harper Collins Publishers 2001

      20 Montrul,S.A, "Causative errors with unaccusative verbs in Spanish as a second language" 15 : 191-219, 1999

      21 Zobl,H, "Canonical typological structures and ergativity in English L2 acquisition, In Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition" Cambridge University Press 203-221, 1989

      22 최명희, "Accounting for Variability in EFL Learners’ Grammars: Verb Placement and Agreement Marking" 한국중앙영어영문학회 51 (51): 379-401, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼