RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      변형 마우 절골 술기의 유용성과 한계점 (30예 추시 보고) = The Value and Limitation of the Modified Mau Osteotomy (30 Cases Follow Up Report)

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100756780

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate the value and limitation of modified Mau osteotomy through the review of 30 feet treated by this procedure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 cases treated with modified Mau osteotomy since 2002. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months. We reviewed medical records to describe each case and select several clinical factors which related with surgical procedure and could influence on final results. We measured radiographic parameters such as hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), sesamoid position and also assessed clinical outcomes by AOFAS score and satisfaction degrees. Results: The mean preoperative HVA and IMA were $40.4^{\circ}$, $17.4^{\circ}$ and the mean amounts of correction were $31.2^{\circ}$ and $11.5^{\circ}$. Amounts of delayed loss of correction were 16.8% in HVA and 19.2% in IMA. Initial HVA, rotational angle and translation distance of the distal fragment, stability of fixation, first ray instability were revealed as significant factors for the final result from this procedure. DMAA was increased by rotation of the distal fragment and decreased by adding translation on the rotation. Conclusion: Modified Mau osteotomy is an effective procedure to get enough correction. But, it is important to try to avoid excessive rotation of the distal fragment because it may worse joint congruity. It may be worthwhile to pay close attention to the direction of saw and stability of fixation.
      번역하기

      Purpose: To evaluate the value and limitation of modified Mau osteotomy through the review of 30 feet treated by this procedure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 cases treated with modified Mau osteotomy since 2002. The mean durat...

      Purpose: To evaluate the value and limitation of modified Mau osteotomy through the review of 30 feet treated by this procedure. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 30 cases treated with modified Mau osteotomy since 2002. The mean duration of follow-up was 10 months. We reviewed medical records to describe each case and select several clinical factors which related with surgical procedure and could influence on final results. We measured radiographic parameters such as hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), sesamoid position and also assessed clinical outcomes by AOFAS score and satisfaction degrees. Results: The mean preoperative HVA and IMA were $40.4^{\circ}$, $17.4^{\circ}$ and the mean amounts of correction were $31.2^{\circ}$ and $11.5^{\circ}$. Amounts of delayed loss of correction were 16.8% in HVA and 19.2% in IMA. Initial HVA, rotational angle and translation distance of the distal fragment, stability of fixation, first ray instability were revealed as significant factors for the final result from this procedure. DMAA was increased by rotation of the distal fragment and decreased by adding translation on the rotation. Conclusion: Modified Mau osteotomy is an effective procedure to get enough correction. But, it is important to try to avoid excessive rotation of the distal fragment because it may worse joint congruity. It may be worthwhile to pay close attention to the direction of saw and stability of fixation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Coughlin MJ, "Treatment of hallux valgus with an increased distal metatarsal articular angle: evaluation of double and triple first ray osteotomies" 20 : 762-770, 1999

      2 Shereff MJ, "The stability of fixation of first metatarsal osteotomies" 11 : 208-211, 1991

      3 Cohen MM, "The oblique proximal phalangeal osteotomy in the correction of hallux valgus" 42 : 282-289, 2003

      4 Pinney S, "Surgical treatment of mild hallux valgus deformity: the state of practice among academic foot and ankle surgeons" 27 : 970-973, 2006

      5 Coughlin MJ, "Roger A. Mann Award. Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment" 16 : 682-697, 1995

      6 Moon HT, "Results of Ludloff osteotomy in hallux valgus" 9 : 64-68, 2005

      7 Nyska M, "Proximal metatarsal osteotomies: a comparative geometric analysis conducted on sawbone models" 23 : 938-945, 2002

      8 Jones C, "Proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy: the effect of saw blade orientation on first ray elevation" 26 : 152-157, 2005

      9 Park HS, "Operative treatment for hallux valgus with proximal metatarsal osteotomy in patients over 55 years old" 9 : 69-73, 2005

      10 Bae SY, "Modified Mau osteotomy for the treatment of severe hallux valgus" 8 : 117-120, 2004

      1 Coughlin MJ, "Treatment of hallux valgus with an increased distal metatarsal articular angle: evaluation of double and triple first ray osteotomies" 20 : 762-770, 1999

      2 Shereff MJ, "The stability of fixation of first metatarsal osteotomies" 11 : 208-211, 1991

      3 Cohen MM, "The oblique proximal phalangeal osteotomy in the correction of hallux valgus" 42 : 282-289, 2003

      4 Pinney S, "Surgical treatment of mild hallux valgus deformity: the state of practice among academic foot and ankle surgeons" 27 : 970-973, 2006

      5 Coughlin MJ, "Roger A. Mann Award. Juvenile hallux valgus: etiology and treatment" 16 : 682-697, 1995

      6 Moon HT, "Results of Ludloff osteotomy in hallux valgus" 9 : 64-68, 2005

      7 Nyska M, "Proximal metatarsal osteotomies: a comparative geometric analysis conducted on sawbone models" 23 : 938-945, 2002

      8 Jones C, "Proximal crescentic metatarsal osteotomy: the effect of saw blade orientation on first ray elevation" 26 : 152-157, 2005

      9 Park HS, "Operative treatment for hallux valgus with proximal metatarsal osteotomy in patients over 55 years old" 9 : 69-73, 2005

      10 Bae SY, "Modified Mau osteotomy for the treatment of severe hallux valgus" 8 : 117-120, 2004

      11 Acevedo JI, "Mechanical comparison of cyclic loading in five different first metatarsal shaft osteotomies" 23 : 711-716, 2002

      12 Haas Z, "Maintenance of correction of first metatarsal closingbase wedge osteotomies versus modified Lapidus arthrodesis for moderate to severe hallux valgus deformity" 46 : 358-365, 2007

      13 Frey C, "Jahss M and Kummer FJ: The Akin procedure: an analysis of results" 12 : 1-6, 1991

      14 Bonnel F, "Evaluation of the Scarf osteotomy in hallux valgus related to distal metatarsal articular angle: a prospective study of 79 operated cases" 84 : 381-386, 1999

      15 Lau JT, "Effect of increasing distal medial closing wedge metatarsal osteotomies on the distal metatarsal articular angle" 20 : 771-776, 1999

      16 Lippert FG, "Crescentic osteotomy for hallux valgus: a biomechanical study of variables affecting the final position of the first metatarsal" 11 : 204-207, 1991

      17 Sammarco GJ, "Complications after surgery of the hallux" 391 : 59-71, 2001

      18 Nery C, "Biplanar chevron osteotomy" 23 : 792-798, 2002

      19 Hofstaetter SG, "Biomechanical comparison of screws and plates for hallux valgus opening-wedge and Ludloff osteotomies" 23 : 101-108, 2008

      20 Scranton PE, "Anatomic variations in the first ray: part I. Anatomic aspects related to bunion surgery" 151 : 244-255, 1980

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.07 0.07 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.11 0.28 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼