RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    인공지능(AI)과 개인정보규범의 긴장관계 해소방안에 관한 연구 = A Study on Measures to Resolve the Tension Between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Personal Data Protection Norms

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper analyzes the growing tension between generative AI systems and existing data protection frameworks, focusing on the limitations of traditional privacy principles in addressing the AI data lifecycle. In AI development and deployment, personal data are processed continuously—from data collection and training to model deployment and reuse—often beyond the awareness or control of data subjects. Drawing on regulatory and judicial developments in Europe and the United States, including cases involving ChatGPT and Clearview AI, the paper shows that even publicly available personal data cannot be freely collected and reused for AI training without an adequate legal justification. It further highlights how personal data may become embedded in trained models, giving rise to risks such as memorization and inference-based disclosure.
    This paper argues that data subject rights, particularly the right to erasure, become difficult to exercise once models are trained, as deletion may imply model-level unlearning, which entails significant technical and normative challenges. It concludes by proposing a functional and risk-based reinterpretation of the principles of purpose limitation and data minimization, as well as data subject rights, to ensure effective privacy protection in the AI context.
    번역하기

    This paper analyzes the growing tension between generative AI systems and existing data protection frameworks, focusing on the limitations of traditional privacy principles in addressing the AI data lifecycle. In AI development and deployment, persona...

    This paper analyzes the growing tension between generative AI systems and existing data protection frameworks, focusing on the limitations of traditional privacy principles in addressing the AI data lifecycle. In AI development and deployment, personal data are processed continuously—from data collection and training to model deployment and reuse—often beyond the awareness or control of data subjects. Drawing on regulatory and judicial developments in Europe and the United States, including cases involving ChatGPT and Clearview AI, the paper shows that even publicly available personal data cannot be freely collected and reused for AI training without an adequate legal justification. It further highlights how personal data may become embedded in trained models, giving rise to risks such as memorization and inference-based disclosure.
    This paper argues that data subject rights, particularly the right to erasure, become difficult to exercise once models are trained, as deletion may imply model-level unlearning, which entails significant technical and normative challenges. It concludes by proposing a functional and risk-based reinterpretation of the principles of purpose limitation and data minimization, as well as data subject rights, to ensure effective privacy protection in the AI context.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼