RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    방송수용자의 프로그램 품질에 대한 이해와 평가 초점집단토론(FGD)을 이용한 프로그램 품질평가 차원의 재구성 = A Study of the Audience's Understanding and Evaluation of Television Program Quality: Using a Qualitative Method for Concept Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104612067

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study explores the ways in which the audience members understand and evaluate the constructs of television program quality. Based on a critical overview of previous studies on program quality, this study raises two research questions: (1) What dimensions do the audience use to evaluate the program quality? (2) How do the audience evaluate the items used in measuring the program quality in Korea? Focus Group Discussion was employed to examine the qualitative dimensions of the audience’s understanding of television programs. Two major findings were obtained. First, two dimension of quality evaluation were detected in the audience’s discourse on television programs: the cognitive-and-affective response dimension and the importance-and-expression evaluation dimension. Second, when asked in a normal setting, the audience members were not likely to discriminate the major constructs among the quality indices used in evaluation of television program quality. Especially the audience members displayed confusions in discriminating the information and entertainment elements from the overall quality and the public service element. The findings were discussed in terms of the utility of the dimensions of program quality in the process of the construction of a program quality index.
    번역하기

    This study explores the ways in which the audience members understand and evaluate the constructs of television program quality. Based on a critical overview of previous studies on program quality, this study raises two research questions: (1) What di...

    This study explores the ways in which the audience members understand and evaluate the constructs of television program quality. Based on a critical overview of previous studies on program quality, this study raises two research questions: (1) What dimensions do the audience use to evaluate the program quality? (2) How do the audience evaluate the items used in measuring the program quality in Korea? Focus Group Discussion was employed to examine the qualitative dimensions of the audience’s understanding of television programs. Two major findings were obtained. First, two dimension of quality evaluation were detected in the audience’s discourse on television programs: the cognitive-and-affective response dimension and the importance-and-expression evaluation dimension. Second, when asked in a normal setting, the audience members were not likely to discriminate the major constructs among the quality indices used in evaluation of television program quality. Especially the audience members displayed confusions in discriminating the information and entertainment elements from the overall quality and the public service element. The findings were discussed in terms of the utility of the dimensions of program quality in the process of the construction of a program quality index.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-02-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Broadcasting -> Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies KCI등재
    2005-04-11 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of Broadcasting Studies -> Korean Association for Broadcasting & Telecommunication Studies KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1998-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.3 1.3 1.44
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.68 1.972 0.72
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼