RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      독일어 동사의 동작태 (Aktionsart)와 사건구조의 상관관계에 관한 고찰 = Aktionsart and Event Structure of German Prefix Verbs

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19564024

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this paper an attempt will be made to describe the Aktionsarts of German prefix verbs and their relationship with the event structures denoted by event predicates. Most German prefix verbs have either inchoative or resultative Aktionsart, and that they belong to the event predicates which denote changes in the state of affairs. Intuitively these changes are interval based. However, they cannot be fixed and visualized by any means such as tense and aspect on the syntactic level. It was also discovered that most of inchoative and resultative verbs cannot co-occur with durative or time span adverbials and do not undergo the syntactic test such as 'unperso¨nliches passive' or 'Mittelkonstrukton,' whereas durative verbs are very often unmarked to that kind of syntactic tests. This means that the inchoative and the resultative verbs apparently have nothing to do with the interval for their process or action. This would be certainly against our intuition. Through the various syntactic methods such as state passive, attributive adjective derivation, and paraphrase relationship with 'Hilfsverb beginnen and aufho¨ren,' one can confirm the interval for their process or action indirectly. The semantic approach of describing the events denoted by German prefix verbs has brought very important consequences: the event structure denoted by inchoative and resultative verbs is composed of the source state, the target state, and the intervening change between them. Thus the source state and the target state should not stand in a contradictory relationship because of the intervening intervals. As the intervals cannot be visualized on the syntactic level, the change from the source state to the target state seems to happen punctually. This invisible interval can be captured on the lexical level as suggested by word formation rules in Shin (1998a).
      번역하기

      In this paper an attempt will be made to describe the Aktionsarts of German prefix verbs and their relationship with the event structures denoted by event predicates. Most German prefix verbs have either inchoative or resultative Aktionsart, and that ...

      In this paper an attempt will be made to describe the Aktionsarts of German prefix verbs and their relationship with the event structures denoted by event predicates. Most German prefix verbs have either inchoative or resultative Aktionsart, and that they belong to the event predicates which denote changes in the state of affairs. Intuitively these changes are interval based. However, they cannot be fixed and visualized by any means such as tense and aspect on the syntactic level. It was also discovered that most of inchoative and resultative verbs cannot co-occur with durative or time span adverbials and do not undergo the syntactic test such as 'unperso¨nliches passive' or 'Mittelkonstrukton,' whereas durative verbs are very often unmarked to that kind of syntactic tests. This means that the inchoative and the resultative verbs apparently have nothing to do with the interval for their process or action. This would be certainly against our intuition. Through the various syntactic methods such as state passive, attributive adjective derivation, and paraphrase relationship with 'Hilfsverb beginnen and aufho¨ren,' one can confirm the interval for their process or action indirectly. The semantic approach of describing the events denoted by German prefix verbs has brought very important consequences: the event structure denoted by inchoative and resultative verbs is composed of the source state, the target state, and the intervening change between them. Thus the source state and the target state should not stand in a contradictory relationship because of the intervening intervals. As the intervals cannot be visualized on the syntactic level, the change from the source state to the target state seems to happen punctually. This invisible interval can be captured on the lexical level as suggested by word formation rules in Shin (1998a).

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼