RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    관계 유형에 기반한 온톨로지 모듈 평가 메트릭

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82336592

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In response to an increased need, various methods for ontology modularization have been proposed. However, few studies have focused on evaluative methods for ontology modules. In this study, we devise novel metrics to measure ontology modularity. To evaluate the ontology modules, we introduce cohesion and coupling based on the theory of software metrics. A cohesion metric and two coupling metrics were used to measure cohesion and coupling for ontology modules. These metrics were also used to check consistency between the ontology modules and the original ontology. The new metrics support a more detailed relationship between classes in ontology modules. We validate the proposed metrics using the well known verification framework and perform the empirical experiments to complement previous investigations. This study offers ontology engineers valuable criteria with which to select and use ontology modules and modularization techniques.
    번역하기

    In response to an increased need, various methods for ontology modularization have been proposed. However, few studies have focused on evaluative methods for ontology modules. In this study, we devise novel metrics to measure ontology modularity. To e...

    In response to an increased need, various methods for ontology modularization have been proposed. However, few studies have focused on evaluative methods for ontology modules. In this study, we devise novel metrics to measure ontology modularity. To evaluate the ontology modules, we introduce cohesion and coupling based on the theory of software metrics. A cohesion metric and two coupling metrics were used to measure cohesion and coupling for ontology modules. These metrics were also used to check consistency between the ontology modules and the original ontology. The new metrics support a more detailed relationship between classes in ontology modules. We validate the proposed metrics using the well known verification framework and perform the empirical experiments to complement previous investigations. This study offers ontology engineers valuable criteria with which to select and use ontology modules and modularization techniques.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "http://www.lehigh.edu/~zhp2/2004/0401/univ-bench.owl."

    2 "http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/owl-library/koala.owl."

    3 "http://annotation.semanticweb.org/ontologies/iswc.owl."

    4 Seidenberg, J., "Web ontology segmentation : analysis, classification and use" 2006

    5 d’Aquin, M., "Towards a Parametric Ontology Modularization Framework Based on Graph Transformation" 2007

    6 Kitchenham, B., "Towards a Framework for Software Measurement Validation" 21 (21): 1995

    7 Constantine and Yourdon, "Structured Design" Prentice-Hall 1979

    8 Stuckenschmidt, J., "Structure-Based Partitioning of Large Concept Hierarchies" 2004

    9 Noy, N., "Specifying Ontology Views by Traversal" 2004

    10 Ma, Y., "Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems" 83 (83): 2010

    1 "http://www.lehigh.edu/~zhp2/2004/0401/univ-bench.owl."

    2 "http://protege.stanford.edu/plugins/owl/owl-library/koala.owl."

    3 "http://annotation.semanticweb.org/ontologies/iswc.owl."

    4 Seidenberg, J., "Web ontology segmentation : analysis, classification and use" 2006

    5 d’Aquin, M., "Towards a Parametric Ontology Modularization Framework Based on Graph Transformation" 2007

    6 Kitchenham, B., "Towards a Framework for Software Measurement Validation" 21 (21): 1995

    7 Constantine and Yourdon, "Structured Design" Prentice-Hall 1979

    8 Stuckenschmidt, J., "Structure-Based Partitioning of Large Concept Hierarchies" 2004

    9 Noy, N., "Specifying Ontology Views by Traversal" 2004

    10 Ma, Y., "Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems" 83 (83): 2010

    11 Page-Jones, M., "Practical Guide to Structured Systems Design" Yourdon 1980

    12 Doran, P., "Ontology module extraction for ontology reuse : an ontology engineering perspective" CIKM 2007

    13 d’Aquin, M., "Modularization: a Key for the Dynamic Selection of Relevant Knowledge Components" 2006

    14 Yang, Z., "Evaluation Metrics for Ontology Complexity and Evolution Analysis" 2006

    15 Orme, A. M., "Coupling Metrics for Ontology-Based Systems" 23 (23): 102-108, 2006

    16 Yao, H., "Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application" 1 (1): 107-113, 2005

    17 Cuenca Grau, B., "Automatic Partitioning of OWL Ontologies Using E-Connections" 2005

    18 Burton-Jones, A., "A semiotic metrics suite for assessing the quality of ontologies" 55 (55): 84-102, 2005

    19 McCabe, T. J., "A complexity measure" 2 (2): 308-320, 1976

    20 Chidamber, S. R., "A Metric Suite for Object Oriented Design" 17 (17): 36-638, 1994

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-25 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국전자거래학회지
    외국어명 : The Journal of Society for e-Business Studies
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1 1 0.92
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.88 0.91 1.281 0.3
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼