RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    정책적 맥락에서의 우리나라 인명의 가치측정 = The Value of Life in the Korean Policy Making Context

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A30066483

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the value of life saved as a benefit of public policy, and in so doing, overcome some of the major problems often found in the literature. First, this study applies the contingent valuation method (CVM), which is reported to be more rigorous than other existing methods such as the human capital method, hedonic price method, averting behavior method, etc. Second, this study also tries to resolve some of major weakness of CVM such as ① respondents` misperception of the probability of death may result in biased estimations when the probability is extremely low, ② valuing the life saved as a private good can cause a biased estimation, since one person`s death will affect the welfare of the people around him/her, ③ the context given to respondents is quite different from the policy-makers`. Third, the CVM scenario of this study motivated respondents to consider carefully their budget constraint as they were asked to consider the loss of public service as the cost of their valuation of a life. As a result we expect the WTP of those surveyed might be closer to their real ones than other CVM studies with unusual and uruealistic financial constraints. Fourth, the situational context in this survey is the same as the policy-makers`. Therefore the resulting figure can be applied to various policy settings. The value of one life is estimated to be 794 million won, which means that people tend to allow government to spend 794 million won for saving one life. This result seems to prove that the governmental budget constraint really worked as we expected. The shortcomings of this research are as follow. First, we cannot identify the factors determining the estimated level. Second, the sample covers only the Seoul area due to time and financial constraints.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the value of life saved as a benefit of public policy, and in so doing, overcome some of the major problems often found in the literature. First, this study applies the contingent valuation method (CVM), which ...

    The purpose of this study is to estimate the value of life saved as a benefit of public policy, and in so doing, overcome some of the major problems often found in the literature. First, this study applies the contingent valuation method (CVM), which is reported to be more rigorous than other existing methods such as the human capital method, hedonic price method, averting behavior method, etc. Second, this study also tries to resolve some of major weakness of CVM such as ① respondents` misperception of the probability of death may result in biased estimations when the probability is extremely low, ② valuing the life saved as a private good can cause a biased estimation, since one person`s death will affect the welfare of the people around him/her, ③ the context given to respondents is quite different from the policy-makers`. Third, the CVM scenario of this study motivated respondents to consider carefully their budget constraint as they were asked to consider the loss of public service as the cost of their valuation of a life. As a result we expect the WTP of those surveyed might be closer to their real ones than other CVM studies with unusual and uruealistic financial constraints. Fourth, the situational context in this survey is the same as the policy-makers`. Therefore the resulting figure can be applied to various policy settings. The value of one life is estimated to be 794 million won, which means that people tend to allow government to spend 794 million won for saving one life. This result seems to prove that the governmental budget constraint really worked as we expected. The shortcomings of this research are as follow. First, we cannot identify the factors determining the estimated level. Second, the sample covers only the Seoul area due to time and financial constraints.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.82 1.82 1.97
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.98 2.13 2.164 0.32
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼