RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    2004년 개정 한문과(漢文科) 교육과정(敎育課程)의 구체적 내용 분석 = Analysis of detailed contents of The Curriculum of Korean Classical Chinese Education as amended in 2007

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A new curriculum, created by amending the 7th curriculum of Korean classical Chinese education, was publicly notified by Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development on Feb. 28, 2007. This paper analyzed the contents of the new curriculum by comparing it with the 7th curriculum. The new curriculum newly proposes a great number of problems Korean classical Chinese educational-circles must solve. The key to solving these problems also would be a method of proposing a proper question. Because a correct answer is usually included in the question itself. However, it is true various problems related to Korean classical Chinese education does not evoke sympathy of even the inside of Korean classical Chinese educational-circles to say nothing of the nation from the standpoint of looking at problem situation. Therefore, it is necessary to select and perform various theoretical and practical tasks for exciting the least sympathy. The most prominent change of the new curriculum, as compared with the 7th curriculum, includes new definition of tool subjects, and conversion of sphere of contents system from three-division system of Chinese character, Chinese character word and Chinese writing into two-division system of Chinese writing and Chinese writing knowledge. The most significance of this change is the fundamental conversion of a method of teaching·learning for improving the Chinese writing capability of a learner. So to speak, a bottom-up model of previous ``word → Chinese writing`` was converted into a top-down model of ``Chinese writing → word`` and an interaction model which mixed those two models. In a new teaching·learning model based on a top-down and an interaction model, it can be said that importance is relatively placed on Chinese writing than Chinese character and Chinese character word. Accordingly, many people are concerned that education in Chinese character and Chinese character word are likely to be neglected. But the new teaching·learning model does not neglect Chinese character and Chinese character word. Rather, it can be said to be a new attempt of aiming at escaping from existing various restrictions and more creative education in Chinese character and Chinese character word.
    번역하기

    A new curriculum, created by amending the 7th curriculum of Korean classical Chinese education, was publicly notified by Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development on Feb. 28, 2007. This paper analyzed the contents of the new curriculum by co...

    A new curriculum, created by amending the 7th curriculum of Korean classical Chinese education, was publicly notified by Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development on Feb. 28, 2007. This paper analyzed the contents of the new curriculum by comparing it with the 7th curriculum. The new curriculum newly proposes a great number of problems Korean classical Chinese educational-circles must solve. The key to solving these problems also would be a method of proposing a proper question. Because a correct answer is usually included in the question itself. However, it is true various problems related to Korean classical Chinese education does not evoke sympathy of even the inside of Korean classical Chinese educational-circles to say nothing of the nation from the standpoint of looking at problem situation. Therefore, it is necessary to select and perform various theoretical and practical tasks for exciting the least sympathy. The most prominent change of the new curriculum, as compared with the 7th curriculum, includes new definition of tool subjects, and conversion of sphere of contents system from three-division system of Chinese character, Chinese character word and Chinese writing into two-division system of Chinese writing and Chinese writing knowledge. The most significance of this change is the fundamental conversion of a method of teaching·learning for improving the Chinese writing capability of a learner. So to speak, a bottom-up model of previous ``word → Chinese writing`` was converted into a top-down model of ``Chinese writing → word`` and an interaction model which mixed those two models. In a new teaching·learning model based on a top-down and an interaction model, it can be said that importance is relatively placed on Chinese writing than Chinese character and Chinese character word. Accordingly, many people are concerned that education in Chinese character and Chinese character word are likely to be neglected. But the new teaching·learning model does not neglect Chinese character and Chinese character word. Rather, it can be said to be a new attempt of aiming at escaping from existing various restrictions and more creative education in Chinese character and Chinese character word.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼