RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      금융투자상품의 새로운 판매채널과 투자자보호를 위한 판매규제 -온라인 판매채널과 태블릿 브랜치를 중심으로- = New sales Channels of Financial Investment Instruments and Investors Protection Regulations -focused on Online sale Channels and Tablet Branch-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102555697

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      During the recent several years information and communication technology has dramatically developed. This development contributed to introduction of new sales channels which platform internet, mobile, tablets and the like. As the Capital Market Act did not expect online channels and table branches as sales channels, there can be blank in investors protection rules applicable to theses new channels. On the other hand, investors protection rules of the capital Act could conflict other laws providing for new sales channels. Contrary to manufacture centered sales channels online sales channels are considered open channels to all the financial product manufacture companies. Under the Capital Market Act, most regulations on sales for investors protection are applicable only to recommended sales. Online channels without personal contact would not fall under recommended sales. Thus, the problem is raised whether or not sales regulations of the capital Market Act shall apply to online sales channels. Tablet branches are meant a type of sales in which employees of financial companies visit and recommend investors/customers using tablets. This type of sales will fall under definition of door to door sales under the Act on Door to Door Sales, etc. The problem is that a customer is allowed to withdraw his/her offer within 14 days after entering a contract. Considering the investment risk which is the essential nature of financial investment instruments, it would not be proper to apply the Door to Door Act to financial investment instruments, Also it could be against legislation system appropriateness meaning that norm structure and contents should not be in conflict or contradicted among legislations, It is suggested that application of the Door to Door act needs to be explicitly excluded in case of financial investment instruments as in the cases of the U, S, and Japan.
      번역하기

      During the recent several years information and communication technology has dramatically developed. This development contributed to introduction of new sales channels which platform internet, mobile, tablets and the like. As the Capital Market Act di...

      During the recent several years information and communication technology has dramatically developed. This development contributed to introduction of new sales channels which platform internet, mobile, tablets and the like. As the Capital Market Act did not expect online channels and table branches as sales channels, there can be blank in investors protection rules applicable to theses new channels. On the other hand, investors protection rules of the capital Act could conflict other laws providing for new sales channels. Contrary to manufacture centered sales channels online sales channels are considered open channels to all the financial product manufacture companies. Under the Capital Market Act, most regulations on sales for investors protection are applicable only to recommended sales. Online channels without personal contact would not fall under recommended sales. Thus, the problem is raised whether or not sales regulations of the capital Market Act shall apply to online sales channels. Tablet branches are meant a type of sales in which employees of financial companies visit and recommend investors/customers using tablets. This type of sales will fall under definition of door to door sales under the Act on Door to Door Sales, etc. The problem is that a customer is allowed to withdraw his/her offer within 14 days after entering a contract. Considering the investment risk which is the essential nature of financial investment instruments, it would not be proper to apply the Door to Door Act to financial investment instruments, Also it could be against legislation system appropriateness meaning that norm structure and contents should not be in conflict or contradicted among legislations, It is suggested that application of the Door to Door act needs to be explicitly excluded in case of financial investment instruments as in the cases of the U, S, and Japan.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼