RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      中国智慧与可持续发展 = A Study on the Developmental Possibility of the Chinese Wisdom

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106499497

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      China is proud of her 5,000-year history and culture, based on strong ecological environment. Techno-scientific civilization with modern science and technology, on the other hand, cannot guarantee sustainable development, causing ecological crisis.
      There are several reasons that China has a rich history of 5000 years.
      Firstly, Chinese traditional civilization was built on eco-friendly technology of agriculture and sericulture. A source of energy in the traditional society was literally green energy comparing to a source of modern energy, high carbon. Modern techno-scientific civilization cannot guarantee sustainable development to the extent that it is attributed to non-green growth relied on a high level of techno-scientific civilization.
      Secondly, Chinese traditional civilization revered agriculture, while inhibited commerce. It was advantageous to conserving and retaining the ecological environment, in distinction from modern capitalism that precipitated environmental pollution and destruction.
      Thirdly, Chinese traditional civilization was governed by philosophers, neither by either industrialists nor merchants. They valued self-discipline above everything else and strove for an ethical life. This is distinguished from a pattern of mass production and consumption of the modern industrial society.
      Fourthly, Chinese traditional civilization was rooted in the unity of heaven and human. This is entirely different from modern techno-scientific civilization that divides something into a subject and object part and sees something to be conquered. Chinese traditional civilization, in a sense, failed of achievements in modern technology, but kept from such a thought of conquest and rule of nature. Such an aspect enabled Chinese civilization to further sustainable development with ecological environment in its natural state.
      Fifthly, Chinese traditional civilization was concerned with immanent transcendence. Anagogic and imaginative mankind reformed and transformed the reality, so-called transcendence. And this can be divided into two; inward and outward. The former focuses on inner transformation of a human being, while the latter of external environment. East Asian thoughts concentrated on inward transcendence. Modern techno-scientific civilization pursuing outward transcendence, on the other hand, despoiled ecological environment such as environmental pollution and natural damage.
      Considering wisdom of Chinese traditional civilization, this paper attempts to suggest answers for solving modern problems. With a help of scientific technology, a pattern of green growth based on agricultural civilization turns alternative energy as the strength of the sun, wind and tide into power for green growth. Such tradition more concerned with agriculture than industry helps keep environmental destruction and pollution. Another pattern of governance by clerisy helps alleviate and mediate profit maximization of businessmen and industrialists of the present time. Not for interests of special interest group, but for good of the community, right politics must be realized. And a way dichotomous thinking in the modern society must be destroyed. Lastly, sustainability of green growth should be pursued consistently.
      번역하기

      China is proud of her 5,000-year history and culture, based on strong ecological environment. Techno-scientific civilization with modern science and technology, on the other hand, cannot guarantee sustainable development, causing ecological crisis. Th...

      China is proud of her 5,000-year history and culture, based on strong ecological environment. Techno-scientific civilization with modern science and technology, on the other hand, cannot guarantee sustainable development, causing ecological crisis.
      There are several reasons that China has a rich history of 5000 years.
      Firstly, Chinese traditional civilization was built on eco-friendly technology of agriculture and sericulture. A source of energy in the traditional society was literally green energy comparing to a source of modern energy, high carbon. Modern techno-scientific civilization cannot guarantee sustainable development to the extent that it is attributed to non-green growth relied on a high level of techno-scientific civilization.
      Secondly, Chinese traditional civilization revered agriculture, while inhibited commerce. It was advantageous to conserving and retaining the ecological environment, in distinction from modern capitalism that precipitated environmental pollution and destruction.
      Thirdly, Chinese traditional civilization was governed by philosophers, neither by either industrialists nor merchants. They valued self-discipline above everything else and strove for an ethical life. This is distinguished from a pattern of mass production and consumption of the modern industrial society.
      Fourthly, Chinese traditional civilization was rooted in the unity of heaven and human. This is entirely different from modern techno-scientific civilization that divides something into a subject and object part and sees something to be conquered. Chinese traditional civilization, in a sense, failed of achievements in modern technology, but kept from such a thought of conquest and rule of nature. Such an aspect enabled Chinese civilization to further sustainable development with ecological environment in its natural state.
      Fifthly, Chinese traditional civilization was concerned with immanent transcendence. Anagogic and imaginative mankind reformed and transformed the reality, so-called transcendence. And this can be divided into two; inward and outward. The former focuses on inner transformation of a human being, while the latter of external environment. East Asian thoughts concentrated on inward transcendence. Modern techno-scientific civilization pursuing outward transcendence, on the other hand, despoiled ecological environment such as environmental pollution and natural damage.
      Considering wisdom of Chinese traditional civilization, this paper attempts to suggest answers for solving modern problems. With a help of scientific technology, a pattern of green growth based on agricultural civilization turns alternative energy as the strength of the sun, wind and tide into power for green growth. Such tradition more concerned with agriculture than industry helps keep environmental destruction and pollution. Another pattern of governance by clerisy helps alleviate and mediate profit maximization of businessmen and industrialists of the present time. Not for interests of special interest group, but for good of the community, right politics must be realized. And a way dichotomous thinking in the modern society must be destroyed. Lastly, sustainability of green growth should be pursued consistently.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "量子物理学终于认识到这种设定的错误"

      2 "当然,道教和佛教都必然神化修行到极高境界的人"

      3 "中国古代哲人认为,内向超越达到极高境界可合外内之道而与天地同"

      4 "不排除随着人口增长而缓慢加剧的对生态健康的破坏,例如,随着人口的增长,必须开垦荒野,挤占野生 动植物的栖息地"

      1 "量子物理学终于认识到这种设定的错误"

      2 "当然,道教和佛教都必然神化修行到极高境界的人"

      3 "中国古代哲人认为,内向超越达到极高境界可合外内之道而与天地同"

      4 "不排除随着人口增长而缓慢加剧的对生态健康的破坏,例如,随着人口的增长,必须开垦荒野,挤占野生 动植物的栖息地"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-06-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 율곡사상연구 -> 율곡학연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF YULGOK-STUDIES
      KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.47 1.667 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼