RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      황도주의 주륙관 연구 = A Study of Huangdaozhou(黃道周)'s Appreciation of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's Philosophy

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106499496

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The debate between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is the most important academic debate in the development of Neo-confucianism.
      The debate developed by the ideological disagreement between the two influenced later disputes between the two academic schools.
      The controversy, which was continued by most scholars from Song to Ming, did not recognize each other because of the prejudice of each school.
      In this situation, Huangdaozhou(黃道周) tried to reconcile between the two by objectively comparing the philosophy of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan.
      Huangdaozhou accepts Luxue(陸學) based on Zhuzixue(朱子學). Also, through this, he tried to harmonize the two ideas.
      From this standpoint, he does not accept unjudgmentally about Zhuzixue(朱子學), but rather interprets Zhuzixue(朱子學) newly. He basically develops the theory of Zhuzixue(朱子學) and Luxue(陸學) from the standpoint of harmony.
      Strictly speaking, he accepts Luxue(陸學) from the standpoint of Zhuzixue(朱子學). This does not mean, however, that it simply takes an uncritical position on Zhuzixue(朱子學). What a and b pursue is to conclude that they are not different and try to make up for each other's shortcomings with each other's strengths.
      His research attempts to expand the horizon of the Same & Difference on Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's Philosophy debate that has progressed since the debate between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan.
      번역하기

      The debate between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is the most important academic debate in the development of Neo-confucianism. The debate developed by the ideological disagreement between the two influenced later disputes between the two ac...

      The debate between Zhu Xi(朱熹) and Lu Jiuyuan(陸九淵) is the most important academic debate in the development of Neo-confucianism.
      The debate developed by the ideological disagreement between the two influenced later disputes between the two academic schools.
      The controversy, which was continued by most scholars from Song to Ming, did not recognize each other because of the prejudice of each school.
      In this situation, Huangdaozhou(黃道周) tried to reconcile between the two by objectively comparing the philosophy of Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan.
      Huangdaozhou accepts Luxue(陸學) based on Zhuzixue(朱子學). Also, through this, he tried to harmonize the two ideas.
      From this standpoint, he does not accept unjudgmentally about Zhuzixue(朱子學), but rather interprets Zhuzixue(朱子學) newly. He basically develops the theory of Zhuzixue(朱子學) and Luxue(陸學) from the standpoint of harmony.
      Strictly speaking, he accepts Luxue(陸學) from the standpoint of Zhuzixue(朱子學). This does not mean, however, that it simply takes an uncritical position on Zhuzixue(朱子學). What a and b pursue is to conclude that they are not different and try to make up for each other's shortcomings with each other's strengths.
      His research attempts to expand the horizon of the Same & Difference on Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan's Philosophy debate that has progressed since the debate between Zhu Xi and Lu Jiuyuan.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임홍태, "李紱의 朱陸觀 연구― 『주자만년전론』을 중심으로 ―" 한국철학사연구회 (37) : 159-195, 2013

      2 黃進興, "李紱與淸代陸王學派" 江蘇敎育出版社 2010

      3 陸九淵, "陸九淵集" 中華書局 1980

      4 許卉, "論黃道周的宋明理學觀" (3) : 2015

      5 변원종, "주자학의 형성과 논변의 사유구조" 한국학술정보(주) 2007

      6 배영동, "명말청초사상" 민음사 1992

      7 박종배, "명·청시기 서원 강회의 발전 과정에 관한 일 고찰" 한국교육사학회 35 (35): 47-70, 2013

      8 侯真平, "黄道周纪年著述书画考" 厦門大学出版社 1994

      9 鄭晨寅, "黃道周論稿" 河南人民出版社 2014

      10 靑禾, "黃道周" 厦門大學出版社 2014

      1 임홍태, "李紱의 朱陸觀 연구― 『주자만년전론』을 중심으로 ―" 한국철학사연구회 (37) : 159-195, 2013

      2 黃進興, "李紱與淸代陸王學派" 江蘇敎育出版社 2010

      3 陸九淵, "陸九淵集" 中華書局 1980

      4 許卉, "論黃道周的宋明理學觀" (3) : 2015

      5 변원종, "주자학의 형성과 논변의 사유구조" 한국학술정보(주) 2007

      6 배영동, "명말청초사상" 민음사 1992

      7 박종배, "명·청시기 서원 강회의 발전 과정에 관한 일 고찰" 한국교육사학회 35 (35): 47-70, 2013

      8 侯真平, "黄道周纪年著述书画考" 厦門大学出版社 1994

      9 鄭晨寅, "黃道周論稿" 河南人民出版社 2014

      10 靑禾, "黃道周" 厦門大學出版社 2014

      11 陳來, "黃漳浦集" 中華書局 2017

      12 黃道周, "黃漳浦集" 中華書局 2017

      13 沈善洪, "黃宗羲全集" 浙江古籍出版社 2005

      14 陳良武, "試論黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成" 17 (17): 2014

      15 姚建杭, "榕壇問業" 中國和平出版社 2005

      16 吳長庚, "朱陸學術考辨五種" 江西高校出版社 2000

      17 嵇文甫, "晚明思想史論" 東方出版社 1996

      18 李憲堂, "明末淸初王學修正派社會政治思想述要" 吉林大學史學集刊編輯部 2014

      19 張廷玉, "明史" 中華書局 1974

      20 黃宗羲, "明儒學案" 中華書局 1985

      21 多洛肯, "明代福建進士硏究" 上海辭書出版社 2004

      22 容肇祖, "明代思想史" 上海開明書店 1941

      23 張學智, "明代哲學史" 北京大學出版社 2000

      24 陳時龍, "明代中晩期的講學運動" 复旦大学出版社 2005

      25 신현승, "明代 末期의 儒敎 講學과 劉宗周의 講學 활동" 대동문화연구원 (88) : 371-402, 2014

      26 林拓, "文化的地理過程分析-福建文化的地域性考察" 上海書店出版社 2004

      27 黃宗羲, "宋儒學案" 中華書局 1986

      28 陳來, "中國近世思想史硏究" 商務印書館 2003

      29 梁啓超, "中國近三百年學術史" 東方出版社 1996

      30 文競萱, "“至善”與“爲學”-黄道周《榕壇問業》四書思想研究" 山東大學 2019

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-06-23 학술지명변경 한글명 : 율곡사상연구 -> 율곡학연구
      외국어명 : 미등록 -> JOURNAL OF YULGOK-STUDIES
      KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.57 0.57 0.55
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.49 0.47 1.667 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼