開發制限區域 集團聚落등의 區域調整에 關한 硏究 = (A) Study on the District Rezoning of Clustered Villages within Greenbelts

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to find out the characteristics of the adjustment plan of clustered villages within Green Belts. For this purpose, this study analyzes the case of Namyangju-Si, Gyeonggi-Do. The contents of the case study reviews Green Belts policy reform in relation to the clustered villages on the base of the reviews. This study analyzes the differences of the expected values according to the types of clustered villages, which are classified by size, density. The results of the case analysis are as follows
The result of analysis showed that the community becoming a problem on the boundary setting process was the rural type of community. The current guideline does not stipulate the boundary setting criterion by characteristic of the community independently but applies to all the types of community. To resolve this problem, this study attempted to determine the density of houses with the criterion for building density for the building behavior to become legal within the current Green Belts in case the Green Belts was abolished and changed into natural greens.
The house density was 7 houses/ha that could be obtained through two analyses. The current guideline requires that the house density be 10 houses/ha, and the house density criterion should be lowered to 7 houses/ha to complement the problem in setting the district boundary due to the adjustment of the limited development district.
The result of analysis showed that the community composed of less than 20 houses was designated as the community district, had the activity restriction relaxed and could receive the expected value of the structure. When the community of more than 20 houses to less than 50 houses receives the expected value of the structure, it is greatly advantageous to reorganize it into the community district overall rather than turn it into the natural greens. It is more greatly advantageous to turn in into the natural greens than into community district due to the remarkable difference in publicly announced land price.
When the community is overall reorganized, it can be subsidized from government when it is developed as the community district rather than as the 1st-grade residential district. And it may have the advantage of low project cost. But the expected value at the time of overall reorganization into the 1st-grade residential district was found to be highest in terms of profitability owing to the remarkable difference in the building density. This study sought to compare the difference in the expected value between the overall buy-over method and the community with more than 50 houses is overall reorganized. In the community reorganization project, not the large-scale housing land development project but the small-scale urban development project, the replotting method showed the greater expected value than the overall buy-over method. This indicates that the replotting-based method based on compensation because of the gap in land proce change due to the change of the use district.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차 = ⅰ
• 第1章 서론 = 1
• 第1節 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 第2節 연구의 범위 및 방법 = 2
• 第2章 개발제한구역 현황 및 문헌적 고찰 = 5
• 第1節 개발제한구역의 현황 = 5
• 1. 의의 및 목적 = 5
• 2. 개발제한구역 지정면적과 설정목적 = 6
• 3. 개발제한구역의 토지소유현황 = 8
• 4. 개발제한구역내 건축물 현황 = 8
• 5. 개발제한구역내 취락현황 = 9
• 6. 개발제한구역의 중복규제현황 = 10
• 第2節 개발제한구역 제도의 변천 = 13
• 제3절 개발제한구역관련 법·제도 = 15
• 1. 국토이용체계의 개편 = 15
• 2. 개발제한구역의지정및관리에관한특별조치법 = 18
• 3. 개발제한구역 토지매수제도 = 19
• 제4절 개발제한구역의 조정방안 = 22
• 1. 개발제한구역조정의 체계 = 22
• 2. 집단취락에 대한 우선해제 = 24
• 3. 취락지구 = 27
• 4. 광역도시계획에 의한 해제 = 29
• 第5節 개발제한구역내 취락정비관련 제도 = 31
• 1. 정비관련 법·제도 = 31
• 2. 도시개발법 = 32
• 3. 도시재개발법 = 38
• 4. 도시저소득주민의주거환경개선을위한임시조치법 = 44
• 5. 농어촌주택개량촉진법 = 48
• 6. 정비관련 사업법제도의 적용과 한계 = 50
• 第3章 구역경계선 정형화 방안 분석 = 52
• 第1節 분석방법 = 52
• 第2節 개발제한구역 조정에 따른 경계설정 = 53
• 1. 경계선 설정시 문제점 = 53
• 2. 문제점의 원인분석 = 55
• 3. 경계선 정형화를 위한 적정 호수밀도 분석 = 56
• 4. 적정획지규모에 의한 호수밀도 = 59
• 5. 경계선 설정대안 = 60
• 第4章 취락규모별 구역조정에 따른 주민기대가치 분석 = 63
• 第1節 분석방법 = 63
• 제2절 사례대상지 취락별 가치분석 = 64
• 1. 사례대상지 선정 = 64
• 2. 남양주시 지가현황 = 66
• 3. 10~19호취락의 정비모델 = 67
• 4. 20~49호취락의 정비모델 = 71
• 5. 50호이상취락의 정비모델 = 79
• 6. 개발제한구역내 취락의 정비방안 = 87
• 第5章 결론 = 89
• □ 참고문헌 = 91
• ABSTRACT = 92