RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI우수등재

      19세기 유럽협조체제(The Concert of Europe)에 나타난 강대국 정치를 통해 본 21세기 중국의 신형대국관계

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100119429

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      New Model of Major Country relations received lot of spotlight when Vice President Xi Jinping first proposed it during his visit to US in February 2012. On May 3<SUP>rd</SUP> same year at the opening of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> US-China Security & Economic Dialogue(S&ED), then President Hu Jintao said “China and the US should promote cooperative partnership in order to establish ‘new model of major country relations’ so that people from the two countries and the world can feel safe and secure. Such relationship will mark a clear departure from the past great power relations with recurring mistrust and competition. And newly appointed President Xi reemphasized the new model of relations between the US and China again during the his summit with President Obama in June 2013 at California. The essence of China’s proposal is to prevent a hegemonic war with US as traditional power shift theory argues and to establish a peaceful relations. Nevertheless, many raise questions regarding the ambiguity of the concept, structural factor for conflicts of interests, lack of mutual consensus on the future relationship, mistrust over East Asia policy, and possible application of the concept to other powers. In particular the details of Chinese proposal tend to share lot of traits of great power politics of the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century Europe. This paper will first look into the evolution of the “new model of major country relations” discourse between the US and China. Second, the similarity and difference between the “new model” and 19<SUP>th</SUP> century European great power relations will be discussed. Third, it will conclude with implications for the US-China bilateral relations as well as East Asian geopolitics including the Korean Peninsula.
      번역하기

      New Model of Major Country relations received lot of spotlight when Vice President Xi Jinping first proposed it during his visit to US in February 2012. On May 3<SUP>rd</SUP> same year at the opening of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> US-Ch...

      New Model of Major Country relations received lot of spotlight when Vice President Xi Jinping first proposed it during his visit to US in February 2012. On May 3<SUP>rd</SUP> same year at the opening of the 4<SUP>th</SUP> US-China Security & Economic Dialogue(S&ED), then President Hu Jintao said “China and the US should promote cooperative partnership in order to establish ‘new model of major country relations’ so that people from the two countries and the world can feel safe and secure. Such relationship will mark a clear departure from the past great power relations with recurring mistrust and competition. And newly appointed President Xi reemphasized the new model of relations between the US and China again during the his summit with President Obama in June 2013 at California. The essence of China’s proposal is to prevent a hegemonic war with US as traditional power shift theory argues and to establish a peaceful relations. Nevertheless, many raise questions regarding the ambiguity of the concept, structural factor for conflicts of interests, lack of mutual consensus on the future relationship, mistrust over East Asia policy, and possible application of the concept to other powers. In particular the details of Chinese proposal tend to share lot of traits of great power politics of the 19<SUP>th</SUP> century Europe. This paper will first look into the evolution of the “new model of major country relations” discourse between the US and China. Second, the similarity and difference between the “new model” and 19<SUP>th</SUP> century European great power relations will be discussed. Third, it will conclude with implications for the US-China bilateral relations as well as East Asian geopolitics including the Korean Peninsula.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이정남, "중미관계에 대한 중국의 인식: ‘이익 상관자’, ‘G2’와 ‘신형강대국관계’를 중심으로" 현대중국학회 15 (15): 33-66, 2013

      2 이용희, "일반국제정치학(상)" 이조문화원 2013

      3 조영남, "시진핑 시대의 중국 외교 전망: 중국공산당 제18차 당대회의 정치보고를 중심으로" 극동문제연구소 29 (29): 203-231, 2013

      4 신성호, "미국의 대(對)중국 외교안보 전략" 한국전략문제연구소 20 (20): 31-63, 2013

      5 박병광, "국제질서 변환과 전략적 각축기의 미중관계: 중국의 전략적 입장과 정책을 중심으로" 국가안전보장문제연구소 57 (57): 115-143, 2014

      6 "习近平概括中美新型大国关系"

      7 "中俄兩國元首共同簽署聯合聲明"

      8 "Xi-Obama summit opens new chapter in trans-Pacific cooperation"

      9 C. J. Peace Bartlett, "War and the European Powers, 1814-1914" Macmillan Press 1996

      10 Geoff Dyer, "US vs China: is this the new cold war"

      1 이정남, "중미관계에 대한 중국의 인식: ‘이익 상관자’, ‘G2’와 ‘신형강대국관계’를 중심으로" 현대중국학회 15 (15): 33-66, 2013

      2 이용희, "일반국제정치학(상)" 이조문화원 2013

      3 조영남, "시진핑 시대의 중국 외교 전망: 중국공산당 제18차 당대회의 정치보고를 중심으로" 극동문제연구소 29 (29): 203-231, 2013

      4 신성호, "미국의 대(對)중국 외교안보 전략" 한국전략문제연구소 20 (20): 31-63, 2013

      5 박병광, "국제질서 변환과 전략적 각축기의 미중관계: 중국의 전략적 입장과 정책을 중심으로" 국가안전보장문제연구소 57 (57): 115-143, 2014

      6 "习近平概括中美新型大国关系"

      7 "中俄兩國元首共同簽署聯合聲明"

      8 "Xi-Obama summit opens new chapter in trans-Pacific cooperation"

      9 C. J. Peace Bartlett, "War and the European Powers, 1814-1914" Macmillan Press 1996

      10 Geoff Dyer, "US vs China: is this the new cold war"

      11 "US vows to defend Japan over Senkakus: Obama"

      12 Zachary Keck, "US China Rivarly More Dangerous than Cold War?"

      13 Hilary Clinton, "U.S.-Asia Relations: Indispensable to Our Future" Remarks at the Asia Society

      14 "Toward a New Model of Major-Country Relations Between China and The United States" Speech by Foreign Minister Wang Yi at the Brookings Institution

      15 John Podesta, "Toward a New Model of Major Power Relations"

      16 Hilary Clinton, "Toward a Deeper and Broader Relationship With China: Remarks with Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi"

      17 Richard B. Elrod, "The concert of Europe: A fresh look at an international system" 28 (28): 1976

      18 Tom Donilon, "The United States and the Asia-Pacific in 2013" National Security Advisor to the President, The Asia Society

      19 John J. Mearsheimer, "The Tragedy of Great Power Politics" W.W. Norton & Company 2001

      20 Paul Kennedy, "The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500-2000" Random House LLC 1987

      21 Peter M. Cronin, "The Path to a New Type of Power Relations" CSIS

      22 F. R. Bridge, "The Great Powers and the European States System, 1815-1914" Routledge 1980

      23 John J. Mearsheimer, "The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia" 3 : 2010

      24 Harold Nicolson, "The Congress of Vienna: A Study in Allied Unity" Grove Press 1945

      25 Branislav L. Slantchev, "Territory and commitment: The concert of Europe as selfenforcing equilibrium" 14 (14): 2005

      26 Morton A. Kaplan, "System and Process in International Politics" Ecpr Press 2005

      27 "Speech by Vice President Xi Jinping at Welcoming Luncheon Hosted by Friendly Organizations in the United States (February 15, 2012)"

      28 "Secretary Panetta and Chinese Defense Minister General Liang Guanglie hold a Joint News Conference"

      29 "Report of Hu Jintao to the 18th CPC National Congress"

      30 Barack Obama, "Remarks by the president at the U.S./China Strategic and Economic Dialogue" Ronald Reagan Building and International Trade Center

      31 "Remarks by President Obama and President Xi Jinping of the People's Republic of China Before Bilateral Meeting" Sunnylands Retreat

      32 Remarks at the U.S. Institute of Peace China Conference, "Remarks by Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State" U.S. Institute of Peace

      33 "Remarks by Ambassador Cui Tiankai at the 2013 China-US Policy Dialogue Luncheon"

      34 "Remarks at the Sixth Round of the US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue" Diaoyutai State Guesthouse Beijing

      35 "Promote Win-Win Cooperation and Build a New Type of Relations Between Major Countries by Hu Jintao" President of the People's Republic of China, At the Opening Session of the Fourth Round of The China-US Strategic and Economic Dialogues

      36 "Press Briefing By National Security Advisor Tom Donilon"

      37 "President Obama Tokyo News Conference"

      38 Joseph Nye, "Our Pacific Predicament" 2013

      39 Hilary Clinton, "Inaugural Richard C. Holbrooke Lecture on a Broad Vision of U.S.-China Relations in the 21st Century" Benjamin Franklin Room

      40 Gordon A. Graig, "Force and Statecraft: Diplomatic Problems of Our Time" Oxford University Press 1995

      41 Edward Vose Gulick, "Europe’s Classical Balance of Power: a Case History of the Theory and Practice of One of the Great Concepts of European Statecraft" Greenwood Press 1982

      42 Henry Kissinger, "Diplomacy" Simon & Schuster 1995

      43 Stephen Harner, "Clarity in Core Interests, a Must for “A New Type of Power Relations”"

      44 "Chinese, U.S. presidents meet on bilateral ties"

      45 Michael Chase, "China’s Search for a “New Type of Great Power Relationship.”" 2012

      46 Michael D. Swaine, "China’s Assertive Behavior: Part One: On ‘Core Interests.’" 34 (34): 2011

      47 Cui Tiankai, "China-US Relations in China's Overall Diplomacy in the New Era: On China and US Working Together to Build a New-Type Relationship Between Major Countries"

      48 "China, Russia outline cooperation priorities, urge new type of great-power relations"

      49 "China calls for new-type military relationship with US"

      50 Ben Blancard, "China Tells US to stay out of South China Sea’s Disputes"

      51 Caitlin Campbell, "China Seeks a “New Type of Major-Country Relationship” with the United States" U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Backgrounder

      52 Susan E. Rice, "America’s Future in Asia" Georgetown University

      53 Kenneth Liberthal, "Addressing US-China Strategic Distrust" Brookings Institution 2012

      54 Brad Glosserman, "A ‘new type of great power relations?’ Hardly"

      55 Rene Albrecht-Carrie, "A Diplomatic History of Europe Since the Congress of Vienna" Methuen 1958

      56 Robert Gates, "A Balanced Strategy: Reprogramming the Pentagon for a New Age" 88 (88): 2009

      57 Jeffrey A. Bader, "2013 Barnett-Oksenberg Lecture on Sino-American Relations" Brookings Institute

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-12-01 평가 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼