RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    연구개발리더와 추종기업에 대한 주식시장의 차별적 반응 = Differential Stock Market Reactions to R&D Leaders and Followers

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104296288

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Under the conservative accounting standard, most R&D expenditure is expended as it incurred,although it is provable to generate an intangible asset in the future. As a result, the accounting information and related financial ratio, such as market to book ratio and price-earnings ration, for the firms with higher R&D intensity may be misstated. Due to the limited usefulness of R&D information, the market may not impound the value of the R&D efficiently.
    Chan et al.(2001) provided the evidence that the portfolio with highest R&D intensity shows abnormal returns not in the expended year but in subsequent years, and argued it as market inefficiency on the R&D information. In an efficient market, there is no association between R&D intensity and future stock returns.
    This paper extended Chan et al.(2001)’s study by reclassifying portfolios into R&D leaders and followers based on the resources-based view(Barney, 1991). We hypothesize that the market will react instantly and positively to the well organized leaders who invest on R&D activity generating more value, rarity and imperfectly imitability.
    The results are summarized as follows. First, consistent with our hypothesis, the leader shows the positive abnormal return in the expended year. Second, the leader shows the positive abnormal return for subsequent three years. Third, the follower shows the negative abnormal return for subsequent three years.
    Our results suggest that the market reacts efficiently to the R&D leader and follower, and the leader firms perform better consistent with the resource-based view.
    번역하기

    Under the conservative accounting standard, most R&D expenditure is expended as it incurred,although it is provable to generate an intangible asset in the future. As a result, the accounting information and related financial ratio, such as market to b...

    Under the conservative accounting standard, most R&D expenditure is expended as it incurred,although it is provable to generate an intangible asset in the future. As a result, the accounting information and related financial ratio, such as market to book ratio and price-earnings ration, for the firms with higher R&D intensity may be misstated. Due to the limited usefulness of R&D information, the market may not impound the value of the R&D efficiently.
    Chan et al.(2001) provided the evidence that the portfolio with highest R&D intensity shows abnormal returns not in the expended year but in subsequent years, and argued it as market inefficiency on the R&D information. In an efficient market, there is no association between R&D intensity and future stock returns.
    This paper extended Chan et al.(2001)’s study by reclassifying portfolios into R&D leaders and followers based on the resources-based view(Barney, 1991). We hypothesize that the market will react instantly and positively to the well organized leaders who invest on R&D activity generating more value, rarity and imperfectly imitability.
    The results are summarized as follows. First, consistent with our hypothesis, the leader shows the positive abnormal return in the expended year. Second, the leader shows the positive abnormal return for subsequent three years. Third, the follower shows the negative abnormal return for subsequent three years.
    Our results suggest that the market reacts efficiently to the R&D leader and follower, and the leader firms perform better consistent with the resource-based view.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 우춘식, "연구개발집중도에 근거한 포트폴리오의 성과에관한 실증연구" 한국재무관리학회 21 (21): 87-124, 2004

    2 박상규, "연구개발 투자와 채권 등급평가의 관련성" 대한경영학회 18 (18): 1643-1662, 2005

    3 박원, "연구개발 집중기업의 초과수익 현상의 원인" 한국국제회계학회 (20) : 127-147, 2007

    4 백명장, "기업의 연구개발비가 이익과 매출 및 주가에 미치는 영향" 延世大學校 大學院 1994

    5 김원기, "기업규모 및 시장지배력이 연구개발투자활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 15 : 23-54, 1998

    6 조성표, "硏究開發支出의 多期間 利益效果 分析" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 289-315, 2001

    7 Berk, J. B, "Valuation and Return Dynamics of New Ventures" 14 : 1-35, 2004

    8 Hall, B. H, "The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's" 83 (83): 259-264, 1993

    9 Chan, L, "The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures" 56 : 2431-2457, 2001

    10 Jensen, M. C, "The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems" 48 : 831-880, 1993

    1 우춘식, "연구개발집중도에 근거한 포트폴리오의 성과에관한 실증연구" 한국재무관리학회 21 (21): 87-124, 2004

    2 박상규, "연구개발 투자와 채권 등급평가의 관련성" 대한경영학회 18 (18): 1643-1662, 2005

    3 박원, "연구개발 집중기업의 초과수익 현상의 원인" 한국국제회계학회 (20) : 127-147, 2007

    4 백명장, "기업의 연구개발비가 이익과 매출 및 주가에 미치는 영향" 延世大學校 大學院 1994

    5 김원기, "기업규모 및 시장지배력이 연구개발투자활동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 15 : 23-54, 1998

    6 조성표, "硏究開發支出의 多期間 利益效果 分析" 한국경영학회 30 (30): 289-315, 2001

    7 Berk, J. B, "Valuation and Return Dynamics of New Ventures" 14 : 1-35, 2004

    8 Hall, B. H, "The stock market's valuation of R&D investment during the 1980's" 83 (83): 259-264, 1993

    9 Chan, L, "The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures" 56 : 2431-2457, 2001

    10 Jensen, M. C, "The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems" 48 : 831-880, 1993

    11 Fama, E. F, "The cross-section of expected returns" 47 : 427-465, 1992

    12 Lev, B, "The capitalization, amortization and value-relevance of R&D" 21 : 107-138, 1996

    13 Chiang C. C, "The Determinants of Investor Valuation of R&D Expenditure in the Software Industry" 22 : 293-313, 2004

    14 Ho, Y. K, "Size, leverage, concentration and R&D investment in generating growth opportunities" 44 : 393-418, 2006

    15 Lev, B, "R&D-related reporting biases and their consequences" 22 (22): 977-1026, 2005

    16 Gruber, H, "Persistence of Leadership in product innovation" 40 : 359-376, 1992

    17 Caves, B. E, "Identifying mobility barriers, Strategic" 13 : 1-12, 1992

    18 Caves, R. E, "From entry barriers to mobility barriers:conjectural decisions and contrived deterrence to new competition" 91 : 241-262, 1977

    19 Barney, J, "Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage" 17 : 99-120, 1991

    20 Chambers, D, "Excess returns to R&D-intensive firms" 7 : 133-158, 2002

    21 Chan, S. H., "Corporate research and development expenditure and share value" 26 : 255-276, 1990

    22 Porter, "Capital disadvantage:America's failing capital investment system" 70 : 65-82, 1992

    23 Eberhart, A. C, "An examination of long-term excess stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases" 59 : 623-651, 2004

    24 Chauvin, K. W, "Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm" (Winter) : 128-140, 1993

    25 Penman, S. H, "Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns" 77 : 237-264, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼