RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      반말체 어미 ‘-게’의 의미기능 연구 = A Study on Semantic Functions of Final Ending ‘-ge’

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper tries to figure out the additory usage of final ending ‘-ge’―the semantic function of [supposition] and [assumption inducement]― as an extension to the grammaticalization process of final ending ‘-ge,’ originated from a connective ending ‘-ge’ organized by Cho, Eun-Young & Lee, Han-Min (2011).
      The sentence structure of [supposition] ‘-ge’ is consisted of the antecedent clause, which is a conditional clause, and the following clause ‘-ge’ clause, and is used as a rhetorical interrogative of an ironic statement denying the antecedent clause. It also shows some correlation with [completion result] ‘-ge’, considering the fact that ‘-ge’ can be combined with the tense prefinal ending ‘-eoss-’, and that following ‘-ge’ clause cannot be used by itself, and that the following clause can emphasize the antecedent clause semantically.
      The sentence structure of [assumption inducement] ‘-ge’ is often used when inducing a listener to make an assumption of a matter that a speaker already knows. However, it is not used as a question to get a new information from the listener although it may be used in a form of a wh-question or an alternative question. [Assumption inducement] ‘-ge’ clause shows some similar meaning with that of a [completion result] ‘-ge’ clause regarding the fact that it can be combined with the tense prefinal ending ‘-eoss-’ and that this clause is about something that has already happened or determined. However, it shows some differences in that whether this sentence structure can be used alone or its focus point of utterance is on ‘-ge’ clause itself.
      There exists several similarities between [supposition] and [completion result] in syntactic and semantic context, in addition to a transitional phase in which a sentence is used as a [supposition] clause when sentence structures exhibit identical features to [completion result]. Thus, it can be seen that [supposition] is a connecting stage following the [completion stage].
      In case of [assumption inducement], there exists several similarities between [assumption inducement], [completion result] and [supposition] in syntactic and semantic context. However, the authors were not able to draw a definitive conclusion as to whether [assumption inducement] can be dealt with changing meanings of semantic functions of final ending ‘-ge,’ organized in Cho, Eun-Young & Lee, Han-Min (2011). Thus, there is an implied possibility that [Assumption inducement] may not be a grammaticalized final ending ‘-ge’ but that of different origins with dissimilar semantic functions. In the synchronic use, however, it is certain that [assumption result] ‘-ge’ has a definitive correlation with semantic functions of final endings that are grammaticalized in the connective ending ‘-ge.’
      번역하기

      This paper tries to figure out the additory usage of final ending ‘-ge’―the semantic function of [supposition] and [assumption inducement]― as an extension to the grammaticalization process of final ending ‘-ge,’ originated from a connecti...

      This paper tries to figure out the additory usage of final ending ‘-ge’―the semantic function of [supposition] and [assumption inducement]― as an extension to the grammaticalization process of final ending ‘-ge,’ originated from a connective ending ‘-ge’ organized by Cho, Eun-Young & Lee, Han-Min (2011).
      The sentence structure of [supposition] ‘-ge’ is consisted of the antecedent clause, which is a conditional clause, and the following clause ‘-ge’ clause, and is used as a rhetorical interrogative of an ironic statement denying the antecedent clause. It also shows some correlation with [completion result] ‘-ge’, considering the fact that ‘-ge’ can be combined with the tense prefinal ending ‘-eoss-’, and that following ‘-ge’ clause cannot be used by itself, and that the following clause can emphasize the antecedent clause semantically.
      The sentence structure of [assumption inducement] ‘-ge’ is often used when inducing a listener to make an assumption of a matter that a speaker already knows. However, it is not used as a question to get a new information from the listener although it may be used in a form of a wh-question or an alternative question. [Assumption inducement] ‘-ge’ clause shows some similar meaning with that of a [completion result] ‘-ge’ clause regarding the fact that it can be combined with the tense prefinal ending ‘-eoss-’ and that this clause is about something that has already happened or determined. However, it shows some differences in that whether this sentence structure can be used alone or its focus point of utterance is on ‘-ge’ clause itself.
      There exists several similarities between [supposition] and [completion result] in syntactic and semantic context, in addition to a transitional phase in which a sentence is used as a [supposition] clause when sentence structures exhibit identical features to [completion result]. Thus, it can be seen that [supposition] is a connecting stage following the [completion stage].
      In case of [assumption inducement], there exists several similarities between [assumption inducement], [completion result] and [supposition] in syntactic and semantic context. However, the authors were not able to draw a definitive conclusion as to whether [assumption inducement] can be dealt with changing meanings of semantic functions of final ending ‘-ge,’ organized in Cho, Eun-Young & Lee, Han-Min (2011). Thus, there is an implied possibility that [Assumption inducement] may not be a grammaticalized final ending ‘-ge’ but that of different origins with dissimilar semantic functions. In the synchronic use, however, it is certain that [assumption result] ‘-ge’ has a definitive correlation with semantic functions of final endings that are grammaticalized in the connective ending ‘-ge.’

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박진완, "현대국어의 형성과 변천 1" 박이정 2000

      2 고영근, "현대국어의 종결어미에 대한 구조적 연구" 10 (10): 118-157, 1974

      3 박재연, "현대국어 반말체 종결어미 연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1998

      4 하지선, "한국어교육을 위한 종결기능 연결어미 연구" 한양대학교 교육대학원 2006

      5 임동훈, "한국어 조사 ‘만’과‘ 도’의 의미론" (125) : 1-20, 2007

      6 손옥현, "한국어 구어에 나타난 종결어미화된 연결어미 양상 연구" 한국어의미학회 28 : 49-71, 2009

      7 구현정, "조건 표지에서 문장 종결 표지로의 문법화" 8 (8): 1-17, 2001

      8 임지룡, "인지언어학 개론" 태학사 2010

      9 유현경, "연결어미의 종결어미적 쓰임에 대하여" 한글학회 (261) : 123-148, 2003

      10 조은영, "반말체 어미 '-게'의 문법화와 의미 변화" 한국어의미학회 36 : 391-417, 2011

      1 박진완, "현대국어의 형성과 변천 1" 박이정 2000

      2 고영근, "현대국어의 종결어미에 대한 구조적 연구" 10 (10): 118-157, 1974

      3 박재연, "현대국어 반말체 종결어미 연구" 서울大學校 大學院 1998

      4 하지선, "한국어교육을 위한 종결기능 연결어미 연구" 한양대학교 교육대학원 2006

      5 임동훈, "한국어 조사 ‘만’과‘ 도’의 의미론" (125) : 1-20, 2007

      6 손옥현, "한국어 구어에 나타난 종결어미화된 연결어미 양상 연구" 한국어의미학회 28 : 49-71, 2009

      7 구현정, "조건 표지에서 문장 종결 표지로의 문법화" 8 (8): 1-17, 2001

      8 임지룡, "인지언어학 개론" 태학사 2010

      9 유현경, "연결어미의 종결어미적 쓰임에 대하여" 한글학회 (261) : 123-148, 2003

      10 조은영, "반말체 어미 '-게'의 문법화와 의미 변화" 한국어의미학회 36 : 391-417, 2011

      11 김진아, "국어종결어미 {-게}의 용법 연구" 상명대학교 대학원 2001

      12 김태엽, "국어 종결어미화의 문법화 양상" (33) : 47-68, 2000

      13 한길, "국어 종결어미 연구" 강원대학교 출판부 1991

      14 전영진, "국어 연결어미의 종결어미화 연구" 경성대학교 교육대학원 2002

      15 徐禎穆, "慶南方言의 疑問文에 대한 硏究" 서울대학교 대학원 1987

      16 고광모, "‘-겠-’의 형성 과정과 그 의미의 발달" 국어학회 39 : 27-47, 2002

      17 임동훈, "‘-겠-’의 용법과 그 역사적 해석" (37) : 115-147, 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2018-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.47
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.41 1.52 2.572 0.28
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼