RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    On the Korean Inferential Cleft Construction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103675748

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Rather like English examples such as It is that he is a genius, Korean also has what has been called an "inferential cleft construction". This paper looks at the motivations of why speakers would introduce such a construction instead of using a simple declarative sentence, at what kind of semantic and pragmatic relations are evoked in the construction, and at grammatical properties of the construction of interest. In particular, the paper shows that unlike the English counterpart, the Korean inferential construction has no expletive pronoun, and conveys much wider inferential relationships such as explanation, reason, cause, consequence, and even paraphrase. This wide array of uses allows the construction to be used to facilitate cohesion in a variety of contexts.
    번역하기

    Rather like English examples such as It is that he is a genius, Korean also has what has been called an "inferential cleft construction". This paper looks at the motivations of why speakers would introduce such a construction instead of using a simple...

    Rather like English examples such as It is that he is a genius, Korean also has what has been called an "inferential cleft construction". This paper looks at the motivations of why speakers would introduce such a construction instead of using a simple declarative sentence, at what kind of semantic and pragmatic relations are evoked in the construction, and at grammatical properties of the construction of interest. In particular, the paper shows that unlike the English counterpart, the Korean inferential construction has no expletive pronoun, and conveys much wider inferential relationships such as explanation, reason, cause, consequence, and even paraphrase. This wide array of uses allows the construction to be used to facilitate cohesion in a variety of contexts.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Kim, Ji-yung, "Why Multiple Clefts are Disallowed" Cascadilla Proceedings Project 332-339, 2008

    2 김종복, "Two Types of Cleft Constructions in Korean: A Constraint-Based Approach" 한국언어정보학회 12 (12): 85-103, 2008

    3 Heycock, Caroline, "Topic, Focus, and Syntactic Representations" Cascadilla Press 101-125, 2002

    4 Heggie, Lorie A, "The Syntax of Copular Structures" University of Southern California 1988

    5 Kuno,Susumu, "The Structure of the Japanese Language" MIT Press 1973

    6 Declerck, Renaat, "The Inferential It is That-construction and Its Congeners" 87 : 203-230, 1992

    7 Bearth, Thomas, "The Inferential Gap Condition" 9 : 249-288, 1999

    8 Bolinger, Dwight L, "That's That" Mouton 1972

    9 Mikkelsen, Line, "Specifying Who: On The Structure, Meaning, and Use Of Specificational Copular Clauses" UC Santa Cruz 2004

    10 Den Dikken, Marcel, "Specificational Copular Sentences and Pseudo- clefts in The Syntax Companion" Blackwell 2001

    1 Kim, Ji-yung, "Why Multiple Clefts are Disallowed" Cascadilla Proceedings Project 332-339, 2008

    2 김종복, "Two Types of Cleft Constructions in Korean: A Constraint-Based Approach" 한국언어정보학회 12 (12): 85-103, 2008

    3 Heycock, Caroline, "Topic, Focus, and Syntactic Representations" Cascadilla Press 101-125, 2002

    4 Heggie, Lorie A, "The Syntax of Copular Structures" University of Southern California 1988

    5 Kuno,Susumu, "The Structure of the Japanese Language" MIT Press 1973

    6 Declerck, Renaat, "The Inferential It is That-construction and Its Congeners" 87 : 203-230, 1992

    7 Bearth, Thomas, "The Inferential Gap Condition" 9 : 249-288, 1999

    8 Bolinger, Dwight L, "That's That" Mouton 1972

    9 Mikkelsen, Line, "Specifying Who: On The Structure, Meaning, and Use Of Specificational Copular Clauses" UC Santa Cruz 2004

    10 Den Dikken, Marcel, "Specificational Copular Sentences and Pseudo- clefts in The Syntax Companion" Blackwell 2001

    11 김종복, "Some Remarks on Korean Nominalizer kes and Information Structure" 한국생성문법학회 17 (17): 479-494, 2007

    12 Otake, Yoshi, "Semantics and Functions of the it is that-construction and the Japanese No da-construction" 43 : 143-157, 2002

    13 Declerck, Renaat, "Pseudo-modifiers" 54 : 135-163, 1981

    14 Delahunty, Gerald P, "On the Spanish Inferential Construction ser que" 10 (10): 301-322, 2000

    15 Delahunty, Gerald P, "Discourse Functions of Inferential Sentences" 39 (39): 517-545, 2001

    16 Koops,Christian, "Constraints on Inferential Constructions in Aspects of Meaning Construction" John Bejamins 207-224, 2007

    17 Halliday, Michael A, "Cohesion in English" Longman 1976

    18 Halliday, Michael A, "An Introduction to Functional Grammar" Edward Arnold 1985

    19 Lambrecht, Knud, "A framework for the Analysis of Cleft Constructions" 39 (39): 463-516, 2001

    20 Horn,Lawrence, "A Natural History of Negation" University of Chicago Press 1989

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.39 0.39 0.34
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.33 0.34 0.709 0.06
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼