RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      차세대 목록 교육의 방향성에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Direction Future of Cataloging Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105756328

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Outsourcing, importing of publishing metadata and revitalizing copy cataloging have reduced importance of traditional cataloging. Request of interoperability between other communities and business integration of related system also have changed the meaning of library catalog. Furthermore, newly declared principle and rules are totally different to existing AACR, MARC, measures to cataloging education for next generation seems to be urgently needed. In this study, firstly put together a series of discussion about future cataloging and new role of cataloging librarian, and secondly basis on it, suggest direction of cataloging education course which divided two sectors. One is for students who are undergraduated, and another is for current cataloger at working level. In basic training, it should contain principle of knowledge organization and diverse resources and its relationship, encoding scheme and its practice. The other hand, in re-education training, it should include that re-recognition about new concept of bibliographic world, changing vocabulary and encoding scheme, furthermore metadata scheme about diverse resources which library have accepted, and its integration.
      번역하기

      Outsourcing, importing of publishing metadata and revitalizing copy cataloging have reduced importance of traditional cataloging. Request of interoperability between other communities and business integration of related system also have changed the me...

      Outsourcing, importing of publishing metadata and revitalizing copy cataloging have reduced importance of traditional cataloging. Request of interoperability between other communities and business integration of related system also have changed the meaning of library catalog. Furthermore, newly declared principle and rules are totally different to existing AACR, MARC, measures to cataloging education for next generation seems to be urgently needed. In this study, firstly put together a series of discussion about future cataloging and new role of cataloging librarian, and secondly basis on it, suggest direction of cataloging education course which divided two sectors. One is for students who are undergraduated, and another is for current cataloger at working level. In basic training, it should contain principle of knowledge organization and diverse resources and its relationship, encoding scheme and its practice. The other hand, in re-education training, it should include that re-recognition about new concept of bibliographic world, changing vocabulary and encoding scheme, furthermore metadata scheme about diverse resources which library have accepted, and its integration.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이재선, "새로운 목록 원칙과 규칙 - ICP, ISBD, RDA를 중심으로" 117-150, 2009

      2 Brian E. C. Schottlaender, "What They Don't Teach in Library School : Employers’ Expectations for Cataloging Recruits"

      3 Matthew Beacom, "Training Issues Managers Face"

      4 "The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA"

      5 Sue Ann Gardner, "The Changing Landscape of Contemporary Cataloging, Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln"

      6 Diane Hillmann, "The Challenges Facing Cataloging and Catalogers : RDA, DCMI, FRBR, and What They Mean for Libraries"

      7 J. Griffiths, "Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google" 53 (53): 539-554, 2005

      8 박진희, "RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구" 한국도서관·정보학회 40 (40): 317-338, 2009

      9 조재인, "RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지 제어의 장래에 대한 고찰" 한국문헌정보학회 43 (43): 85-105, 2009

      10 The Library of Congress Working Group, "On the Record : the Future of Bibliographic Control"

      1 이재선, "새로운 목록 원칙과 규칙 - ICP, ISBD, RDA를 중심으로" 117-150, 2009

      2 Brian E. C. Schottlaender, "What They Don't Teach in Library School : Employers’ Expectations for Cataloging Recruits"

      3 Matthew Beacom, "Training Issues Managers Face"

      4 "The Joint Steering Committee for Development of RDA"

      5 Sue Ann Gardner, "The Changing Landscape of Contemporary Cataloging, Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln"

      6 Diane Hillmann, "The Challenges Facing Cataloging and Catalogers : RDA, DCMI, FRBR, and What They Mean for Libraries"

      7 J. Griffiths, "Student Searching Behavior and the Web: Use of Academic Resources and Google" 53 (53): 539-554, 2005

      8 박진희, "RDA의 제정동향 및 내용구조에 관한 연구" 한국도서관·정보학회 40 (40): 317-338, 2009

      9 조재인, "RDA 구현 시나리오와 서지 제어의 장래에 대한 고찰" 한국문헌정보학회 43 (43): 85-105, 2009

      10 The Library of Congress Working Group, "On the Record : the Future of Bibliographic Control"

      11 Karen Calhoun, "On Competition for Catalogers : What They Don’t Teach in Library School"

      12 Roy Tennant, "Metadata Leadership" (15) : 2004

      13 Barbara Tillett, "Looking to the Future"

      14 안영희, "IFLA FRAD 모형이 관련 표준에 미친 영향 연구" 한국정보관리학회 26 (26): 279-303, 2009

      15 谷口 祥一, "Google時代の目録教育·メタデータ教育" 58 (58): 2008

      16 John Atting, "DA: ready for take-off"

      17 The ALCTS Continuing Education Task Force, "Cataloging for the 21st Century : A Proposal for Continuing Education for Cataloging Professionals"

      18 Hsiesh Yee, "Cataloging and Metadata Education : A Proposal for Preparing Cataloging Professionals of the 21st Century"

      19 J. Randolph Call, "Cataloger Competences for Public Libraries"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-11-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society KCI등재
      2014-10-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국도서관ㆍ정보학회 -> 한국도서관·정보학회 KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.72 0.997 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼