RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    창업시 네트워크자원의 창업후 기업성과 및 전략에 대한 영향 = 게임개발산업을 통한 실증적 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856604

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Founding contexts matter in determining eventual organizational evolutions (Hannan & Freeman, 1997; Lawrence, 1984; Zald, 1987; Boeker, 1989). Among different facets of founding contexts, we focus on the founding network resources in this study. We define founding network resources as the cooperative relationships a firm creates with external organizations and individuals at the time of its founding. While the idiosyncratic organizational routines (Nelson & Winter, 1982) may emerge independently from the organization itself, it may as well be that those routines are an outcome of transferred practices and imitated processes from external sources, or their mutations with internally developed routines over random-based historical events and continuous interfaces with external environments. Inputs from a network of allies at founding stage, along with other founding contexts, create a genetic imprinting (Boeker, 1989) that lasts over the life of the organization. No organizations at their births can be free from the routines or genetic structures created by their predecessors. To varying degrees, start-ups inherit the routines of their family members, that is, the network of founding alliances. Like inheriting superior genes, as a start-up receives more of the positive influences from the founding alliances, the chances of its survival or performance would increase. Exposures to such positive influences from the founding alliances at the inception would also lead the start-up to become increasingly network-dependent in its behavioral patterns.We argue in this paper that an important portion of variations in firm performance and strategic behaviors one observes now can be traced back to firm's founding network resources in the past. Assuming the evolutionary context of the two different time stages i.e. firm's founding stage and post-founding stage, this research proposes and tests the following three theses relating to firm's founding network resources: (1) firm's initial endowment of network resources at the founding stage enhances the firm's eventual performance at post-founding stage, (2) the amount of founding network resources a firm starts with also influences how extensively the firm will rely on external networks for building its own competitive advantage and growth potentials at post-founding stages, (3) an important variations in the strengths of the above relationships can be accounted for by the differences in top manager's leadership. For the empirical investigations of our research questions presented in this paper, we found the game development industry of Korea fairly relevant as research sample. The game development industry of Korea suits our research purpose well in that bulk of the industry participants we observe today were newly created start-ups founded during a relatively identical time period i.e. mostly during the few years after 1997.
    번역하기

    Founding contexts matter in determining eventual organizational evolutions (Hannan & Freeman, 1997; Lawrence, 1984; Zald, 1987; Boeker, 1989). Among different facets of founding contexts, we focus on the founding network resources in this study. We de...

    Founding contexts matter in determining eventual organizational evolutions (Hannan & Freeman, 1997; Lawrence, 1984; Zald, 1987; Boeker, 1989). Among different facets of founding contexts, we focus on the founding network resources in this study. We define founding network resources as the cooperative relationships a firm creates with external organizations and individuals at the time of its founding. While the idiosyncratic organizational routines (Nelson & Winter, 1982) may emerge independently from the organization itself, it may as well be that those routines are an outcome of transferred practices and imitated processes from external sources, or their mutations with internally developed routines over random-based historical events and continuous interfaces with external environments. Inputs from a network of allies at founding stage, along with other founding contexts, create a genetic imprinting (Boeker, 1989) that lasts over the life of the organization. No organizations at their births can be free from the routines or genetic structures created by their predecessors. To varying degrees, start-ups inherit the routines of their family members, that is, the network of founding alliances. Like inheriting superior genes, as a start-up receives more of the positive influences from the founding alliances, the chances of its survival or performance would increase. Exposures to such positive influences from the founding alliances at the inception would also lead the start-up to become increasingly network-dependent in its behavioral patterns.We argue in this paper that an important portion of variations in firm performance and strategic behaviors one observes now can be traced back to firm's founding network resources in the past. Assuming the evolutionary context of the two different time stages i.e. firm's founding stage and post-founding stage, this research proposes and tests the following three theses relating to firm's founding network resources: (1) firm's initial endowment of network resources at the founding stage enhances the firm's eventual performance at post-founding stage, (2) the amount of founding network resources a firm starts with also influences how extensively the firm will rely on external networks for building its own competitive advantage and growth potentials at post-founding stages, (3) an important variations in the strengths of the above relationships can be accounted for by the differences in top manager's leadership. For the empirical investigations of our research questions presented in this paper, we found the game development industry of Korea fairly relevant as research sample. The game development industry of Korea suits our research purpose well in that bulk of the industry participants we observe today were newly created start-ups founded during a relatively identical time period i.e. mostly during the few years after 1997.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 James, "W. H. 1957. Internal vs. external controlof reinforcement as a basic variable oflearning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" Ohio State University.

    2 Lawrence, "Usingthe past to study the present. Academy ofManagement Review" 307-312,

    3 Young, G. J, "Top management and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: A study of TQM in a public hospital system" 22 : 935-951, 2001

    4 Ghorpade, J, "The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries" 84 : 670-679, 1999

    5 Burt, "The socialstructure of competition. Harvard UniversityPress"

    6 Reuber, R, "The role of management’s international experience in the internationalization of smaller firms" 807-825, 1997

    7 Dyer, J. H, "The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage" 23 : 660-679, 1998

    8 M. 1985. Economic action, "The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology" gra (gra): 481-510,

    9 Hambrick D. C, "The organization as a reflectionof its top managers. Academy of ManagementReview" 193-206.

    10 Hite, J. M, "The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm" 22 : 275-286, 2001

    1 James, "W. H. 1957. Internal vs. external controlof reinforcement as a basic variable oflearning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation" Ohio State University.

    2 Lawrence, "Usingthe past to study the present. Academy ofManagement Review" 307-312,

    3 Young, G. J, "Top management and network effects on the adoption of innovative management practices: A study of TQM in a public hospital system" 22 : 935-951, 2001

    4 Ghorpade, J, "The use of personality measures in cross-cultural research: A test of three personality scales across two countries" 84 : 670-679, 1999

    5 Burt, "The socialstructure of competition. Harvard UniversityPress"

    6 Reuber, R, "The role of management’s international experience in the internationalization of smaller firms" 807-825, 1997

    7 Dyer, J. H, "The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage" 23 : 660-679, 1998

    8 M. 1985. Economic action, "The problem of embeddedness.American Journal of Sociology" gra (gra): 481-510,

    9 Hambrick D. C, "The organization as a reflectionof its top managers. Academy of ManagementReview" 193-206.

    10 Hite, J. M, "The evolution of firm networks: From emergence to early growth of the firm" 22 : 275-286, 2001

    11 W. 1989. Strategic change, "The effects offounding and history. Academy of ManagementJournal" 489-515,

    12 Gulati, R, "Strategic network" 21 : 203-215, 2000

    13 Uzzi, B, "Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness" 42 : 35-67, 1997

    14 Gulati, R, "Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis" 40 : 619-652, 1995

    15 Walker, G, "Social capital, structural holes, and the formation of an industry network" 8 : 109-125, 1997

    16 Inkpen A. C, "Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer" 30 : 146-165, 2005

    17 Woolcock, M, "Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework" 27 : 151-208, 1998

    18 Nelson, "S. G. 1982. AnEvolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Harvard University Press"

    19 House, "R. J. 1977. A 1976 theory of charismaticleadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. Larson" Southern Illinois UniversityPress. 189-207.carbondale

    20 Harper, "P. 1957. Leadership in administration.New York"

    21 Stuart, T. E, "Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry" 43 : 668-698, 1998

    22 Gulati, R, "Network location and learning:The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation" 20 : 397-420, 1999

    23 Eccles, "N. 1992. Is a network perspective auseful way of studying organizations? InN" Harvard BusinessSchool Press. (hria hria & r) :

    24 Freeman, "M. T.1983. The liability of newness" 692-710,

    25 Stuart, T. E, "Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures" 44 : 315-349, 1999

    26 Powell, W. W, "Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology" 41 : 116-145, 1996

    27 Baum, J. C, "Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology" 21 : 267-294, 2000

    28 Waldman, D. A, "Does leadership matter? CEO leadership attributes and profitability conditions of perceived environmental uncertainty" 44 : 134-143, 2001

    29 Anand B. N, "Do firms learnto create value? The case of alliances" 21 : 295-316, 2000

    30 Waldman, "D. 1994. The contributions of totalquality management to a theory of workperformance. Academy of ManagementReview" 510-536,

    31 Dyer, J. H, "Creating and managing a high performance knowledge sharing network: The case of Toyota" 21 : 345-368, 2000

    32 Gulati, R, "Alliances and networks" 19 : 293-317, 1998

    33 Sørensen, J. B, "Aging,obsolescence, and organizational innovation" 45 : 81-112, 2000

    34 March JG, "A. L. 1965. Social structure andorganizations. In handbook of Organizations" Stinchcombe 142-193,

    35 Peteraf, "A resource-based view. StrategicManagement Journal" 170-181, 1993.thecornerstonesofcompetitiveadvantage

    36 Ireland, R. D, "A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions" 29 (29): 963-989, 2003

    37 Ministry of Culture & Tourism, "2004 White Book on Korean Cultural Industries" 2005

    38 Penrose, "1959. The theory of the growth of the firm. New York"

    39 Aldrich, "& Woodward W. 1987.The impact of social networks on businessfoundings and profit A longitudinal study.In Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research" 154-168,

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼