RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    백호(白湖) 윤휴(尹휴)의 『대학』 해석 -삼강령(三綱領)과 격물치지(格物致知)의 이해를 중심으로- = The Interpretation of Baekho Yun Hyu about the Great Learning -In the central figure of understanding of three doctrines and the investigation of things Lies in the perfection of knowledge

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper is the research of the understanding of Baekho Yun Hyu(白湖 尹휴, 1617-1680) about the Great Learning. Yun Hyu is a scholar who succeeded Neo-Confucianism in Joseon dynasty and tried to make a creative interpretation in the seventeenth century. He critically recognized Confucianism in the central figure of Simseongron(心性論 the theory of mind and nature) at that time and aimed Confucianism with practice. Yun Hyu chose the older version of the Great Learning instead of prose commentary on the Great Learning as a text, recognized the Great Learning as learning is great, and expanded learning`s prospect. Learning in this case is based on Myeongdeok(明德) which clarify human nature. Myeongmyeongdeok(明明德) is to clarify mind and nature which were originally clear with taking away things hidden and imbalanced due to worldly desires and dignity, Sinmin(新民) is to lead forward good nature and to correct bad habit at the same time, and Jieojiseon(止於至善) is the man who is practicing Myeongmyeongdeok and Sinmin, and then who reaches Seonggiseongmul(成己成物, realizing perfection for mind and nature). The understanding of Yun Hyu about the Great Learning revealed clearer characteristics than the theory of Gyeokmulchiji(格物致知). Yun Hyu interpreted Gyeokmul(格物) as Gamtong(感通) which is perceiving with feeling. Seonggyeong(誠敬, cultivating human beings for perfection anf self-realization) and Sabyeong(思辨, speculation) joined with the process of Gamtong, and then practical inclination of Confucianism got more clear. He also understood Chiji(致 知) as to perfectly and fully expand good mind of himself, and then to faithfully practice. It came to a mutual understanding with the mind for practice beyond objective recognition about thing`s nature. This Gyeokmulchiji is achieved through Bakhak(博學, learning for erudition)-Simmun(審問, deep inquiry)-Sinsa(愼思, careful consideration)-Myeongbyeong(明辨 clear discernment). Gyeokmul(格物) was to sincerely practice things of Myeongdeok and Sinmin and Chiji is to perfectly practice original good mind and then to surely discern good or bad. The understanding of Yun Hyu about the Great Learning showed practical and realistic Confucianism with the spirit of times adapting Chinese Neo-Confucianism to Joseon`s Confucianism.
    번역하기

    This paper is the research of the understanding of Baekho Yun Hyu(白湖 尹휴, 1617-1680) about the Great Learning. Yun Hyu is a scholar who succeeded Neo-Confucianism in Joseon dynasty and tried to make a creative interpretation in the seventeenth ...

    This paper is the research of the understanding of Baekho Yun Hyu(白湖 尹휴, 1617-1680) about the Great Learning. Yun Hyu is a scholar who succeeded Neo-Confucianism in Joseon dynasty and tried to make a creative interpretation in the seventeenth century. He critically recognized Confucianism in the central figure of Simseongron(心性論 the theory of mind and nature) at that time and aimed Confucianism with practice. Yun Hyu chose the older version of the Great Learning instead of prose commentary on the Great Learning as a text, recognized the Great Learning as learning is great, and expanded learning`s prospect. Learning in this case is based on Myeongdeok(明德) which clarify human nature. Myeongmyeongdeok(明明德) is to clarify mind and nature which were originally clear with taking away things hidden and imbalanced due to worldly desires and dignity, Sinmin(新民) is to lead forward good nature and to correct bad habit at the same time, and Jieojiseon(止於至善) is the man who is practicing Myeongmyeongdeok and Sinmin, and then who reaches Seonggiseongmul(成己成物, realizing perfection for mind and nature). The understanding of Yun Hyu about the Great Learning revealed clearer characteristics than the theory of Gyeokmulchiji(格物致知). Yun Hyu interpreted Gyeokmul(格物) as Gamtong(感通) which is perceiving with feeling. Seonggyeong(誠敬, cultivating human beings for perfection anf self-realization) and Sabyeong(思辨, speculation) joined with the process of Gamtong, and then practical inclination of Confucianism got more clear. He also understood Chiji(致 知) as to perfectly and fully expand good mind of himself, and then to faithfully practice. It came to a mutual understanding with the mind for practice beyond objective recognition about thing`s nature. This Gyeokmulchiji is achieved through Bakhak(博學, learning for erudition)-Simmun(審問, deep inquiry)-Sinsa(愼思, careful consideration)-Myeongbyeong(明辨 clear discernment). Gyeokmul(格物) was to sincerely practice things of Myeongdeok and Sinmin and Chiji is to perfectly practice original good mind and then to surely discern good or bad. The understanding of Yun Hyu about the Great Learning showed practical and realistic Confucianism with the spirit of times adapting Chinese Neo-Confucianism to Joseon`s Confucianism.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼