Method development to reduce the fiber content of wheat bran and rice bran through anaerobic fermentation with rumen liquor for use in poultry feed

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: Wheat bran (WB) and rice bran (RB) are the agricultural by-products used as poultry feed in many developing countries. However, their use for poultry feed is limited due to high fiber and the presence of anti-nutritional substances (e.g. β-glucans). The objective of this study was to develop a method to improve the quality of those brans by reducing the fiber content.
Methods: A two-step fermentation method was developed where the second fermentation of first fermented dry bran was carried out. Fermentation was performed at a controlled environment for 3 h and 6 h (n = 6). The composition of brans, buffer solution and rumen liquor was maintained in a ratio of 1:2:3, respectively. Brans were analyzed for dry matter, crude fiber (CF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) content. Celluloses and hemicelluloses were calculated from the difference of ADF-ADL and NDF-ADF, respectively. Samples were compared by two-factor analysis of variance followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests (p<0.05).
Results: CF %, ADF % and cellulose tended to decrease and NDF % and hemicellulose content was reduced significantly (p<0.05). After the 1st fermentation step, NDF decreased 10.7%± 0.55% after 3 h vs 17.0%±0.78% after 6 h in case of WB. Whereas, these values were 2.3%± 0.30% (3 h) and 7.5%±0.69% (6 h) in case of RB. However, after the 2nd fermentation step, the decrease in the NDF content amounted to 9.1%±0.72% (3 h), 17.4%±1.13% (6 h) and 9.3%±0.46% (3 h), 10.0%±0.68% (6 h) in WB and RB, respectively. Cellulose and hemicellulose content was reduced up to 15.6%±0.85% (WB), 15.8%±2.20% (RB) and 36.6%±2.42% (WB), 15.9%±3.53% (RB), respectively after 2nd fermentation of 6 h.
Conclusion: Two-step fermentation process improved the quality of the brans for their use in poultry feed.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Duarte AC, "The type of forage substrate preparation included as substrate in a RUSITEC system affects the ruminal microbiota and fermentation characteristics" 8 : 704-, 2017

2 Hasselman K, "The effect of β-glucanase on the utilization of starch and nitrogen by broiler chicks fed on barley of low-or high viscosity" 15 : 83-93, 1986

3 Cruywagen CW, "The effect of buffering dairy cow diets with limestone, calcareous marine algae, or sodium bicarbonate on ruminal pH profiles, production responses, and rumen fermentation" 98 : 5506-5514, 2015

4 McDougall EI, "Studies on ruminant saliva. 1. The composition and output of sheep's saliva" 43 : 99-109, 1948

5 Dijkstra J, "Simulation of the effects of diet on the contribution of rumen protozoa to degradation of fiber in the rumen" 74 : 617-634, 1995

6 Aschenbach J, "Ruminant nutrition symposum : Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH" 89 : 1092-1107, 2011

7 Dijkstra J, "Ruminal pH regulation and nutritional consequences of low pH" 172 : 22-33, 2012

8 Y. Wang, "Rumen Microbes, Enzymes and Feed Digestion - A Review" 아세아·태평양축산학회 15 (15): 1659-1676, 2002

9 Adeyemi OA, "Replacement of maize by rumen filtrate fermented corn-cob in layer diets" 90 : 221-224, 2003

10 Chibisa GE, "Relative contribution of ruminal buffering systems to pH regulation in feedlot cattle fed either low or high-forage diets" 10 : 1164-1172, 2016

11 Ravindran V, "Poultry development review: Poultry feed availability and nutrition in developing countries" Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2013

12 Sato S, "Pathophysiological evaluation of subacute ruminal acidosis(SARA)by continuous ruminal pH monitoring" 87 : 168-177, 2016

13 Van Soest PJ, "Nutritional ecology of the ruminant" Cornell University Press 476-, 1994

14 Supriyati, "Nutritional Value of Rice Bran Fermented by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Humic Substances and Its Utilization as a Feed Ingredient for Broiler Chickens" 아세아·태평양축산학회 28 (28): 231-238, 2015

15 Shen J, "Monensin and Nisin affect rumen fermentation and microbiota differently in vitro" 8 : 1111-, 2017

16 Van Soest PJ, "Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition" 74 : 3583-3597, 1991

17 Naumann C, "Method Book, Volume III" VDLUFA Verlag 1997

18 Mourino F, "Initial pH as a determinant of cellulose digestion rate by mixed ruminal microorganisms in vitro" 84 : 848-859, 2001

19 Lopez D, "In vitro gas production of foliage from three browse tree species treated with different dose levels of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes" 100 : 920-928, 2016

20 Wizna, "Improving the Quality of Sago pith and rumen content mixture as poultry feed through fermentation by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens" 7 : 249-254, 2008

21 Aanuoluwapo AA, "Growth performance, haematology and meat quality of broiler chickens fed rumen liquor-fermented wheat bran-based diets" 10 : 725-736, 2014

22 Mottet A, "Global poultry production : current state and future outlook and challenges" 73 : 245-256, 2017

23 Sell-Kubiak E, "Genetic aspects of feed efficiency and reduction of environmental footprint in broilers : a review" 58 : 487-498, 2017

24 Satinder K, "Functional properties and anti-nutritional factors in cereal bran" 4 : 122-131, 2011

25 Sechler SR, "Fiber digestion kinetics and protein degradability characteristics of stockpiled Tifton 85 bermudagrass" 95 : 3922-3931, 2017

26 Ravindran V, "Feed enzymes : The science, practice, and metabolic realities" 22 : 628-636, 2013

27 Da Silva LD, "Effects of silage crop and dietary crude protein levels on digestibility ruminal fermentation, nitrogen use efficiency, and performance of finishing beef cattle" 220 : 22-33, 2016

28 Reis WLS, "Effects of ruminal and post-ruminal protein supplementation in cattle fed tropical forages on insoluble fiber degradation, activity of fibrolytic enzymes, and the ruminal microbial community profile" 218 : 1-16, 2016

29 Jazi V, "Effects of fermented cottonseed meal on the growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population and small intestinal morphology in broiler chickens" 58 : 402-408, 2017

30 Weiss CP, "Effects of feeding condensed distiller’s solubles and crude glycerin alone or in combination on finishing beef cattle performance, carcass characteristics, and in vitro fermentation" 95 : 922-929, 2017

31 Pantoja J, "Effects of fat saturation and source of fiber on site of nutrient digestion and milk production by lactating dairy cows" 77 : 2341-2356, 1994

32 Liu Q, "Effects of dietary protein levels and rumen-protected pantothenate on ruminal fermentation, microbial enzyme activity and bacteria population in Blonde d'Aquitaine × Simmental beef steers" 232 : 31-39, 2017

33 Oldick BS, "Effects of degree of fat saturation on fiber digestion and microbial protein synthesis when diets are fed twelve times daily" 78 : 2412-2420, 2000

34 Santra A, "Effect of dietary sodium bicarbonate supplementation on fermentation characteristics and ciliate protozoal population in rumen of lambs" 47 : 203-212, 2003

35 Ouellet DR, "Effect of dietary metabolizable protein level and live yeasts on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows on a high red clover silage diet" 220 : 73-82, 2016

36 Kras RV, "Effect of dietary fiber and genetic strain on the performance and energy balance of broiler chickens" 15 : 15-19, 2013

37 Duarte AC, "Dose-response effects of dietary pequi oil on fermentation characteristics and microbial population using a rumen simulation technique(Rusitec)" 48 : 59-65, 2017

38 Grant RJ, "Digestion kinetics of fiber : influence of in vitro buffer pH varied within observed physiological range" 75 : 1060-1068, 1992

39 Tahir MI, "Comparative evaluation of maize bran, wheat bran and rice bran on milk production of Holstein Friesian cattle" 4 : 559-560, 2002

40 DePeters EJ, "Collection of rumen fluid [Internet]"

41 Munir K, "A review on role of exogenous enzyme supplementation in poultry production" 25 : 66-80, 2013