자궁경부 조직 진단을 기준으로 Surepath$^{TM}$ 액상세포검사와 고식적 직접도말 자궁경부 세포검사법의 비교 = A Comparision of Surepath$^{TM}$ Liquid-Based Smear with a Conventional Smear for Cervicovaginal Cytology-with Reference to a Histological Diagnosis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study was performed to compare Surepath$^{TM}$ liquid-based smear and a conventional cervicovaginal smear with reference to a histological diagnosis. A hybrid capture test (HCII) was also performed and analyzed. We collected matched cases for cervicovaginal cytology-histology: 207 cases for conventional cytology (CC) and 199 cases for liquid-based cytology (LBC). HCII was performed in 254 patients. When a cytological diagnosis of ASCUS or above (ASCUS+) is classified as positive and a histological diagnosis of LSIL+ is classified as positive, the sensitivity and specificity for LBC was 91.7% and 75.9%, respectively and the sensitivity and specificity for CC was 62.6% and 96.1%, respectively. When a cytological and histological diagnosis of LSIL+ is classified as positive, the sensitivity and specificity for LBC was 77.5 and 96.6%, respectively and the sensitivity and specificity for CC was 49.7% and 100%, respectively. When a histological diagnosis of LSIL+ is classified as positive, the sensitivity and specificity for HCII was 78.9% and 78.1%, respectively. The concordance ratio between the cytological and histological diagnosis was 80.4% (kappa=76.0) for LBC and 56.5% (kappa=55.1) for CC. LBC is more sensitive and less specific then CC, as a cytological cutoff level of ASCUS, but more sensitive and equally specific, as a cytological cutoff level LSIL or HSIL. LBC is more reliable with a high concordance ratio between the cytological and histological diagnosis.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Hutchinson ML, "Utility of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer screening: Results of a population-based study conducted in a region of Costa Rica with a high incidence of cervical cancer" 87 : 48-55, 1999

2 Carpenter AB, "Thinprep Pap Test: Performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital" 87 : 105-112, 1999

3 Colgan TJ, "Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-Surepath in the Ontario screening program" 102 : 362-367, 2004

4 Dodd LG, "Quality-assurance study of simultaneously sampled non-correlating cervical cytology and biopsies" 138-44, diagncytopathol1993;9

5 Tench W, "Preliminary assessment of the AutoCyte PREP" 45 : 912-916, 2000

6 Abulafia O. Pezzullo JC, "Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey" 90 : 137-144, 2003

7 Temple GF, "Oncogenic association of specific human papillomavirus types with cervical neoplasia" Lorincz AT 671-7,

8 Bishop JW, "Multicenter masked evaluation of AutoCyte PREP thin layers with matched conventional smears, including initial biopsy results" 42 : 189-197, 1998

9 Jeon YK, "Liquidbased cytology using MonoPrep2(TM) system in cervicovaginal cytology: comparative study with conventional Pap smear and histology" 15 : 33-39, 2004

10 Klinkamer PJ, "Liquid-based cervical cytology" 99 : 263-271, 2003

11 Montz FJ, "Impact of increasing Papanicolaou test sensitivity and compliance: A modeled cost and outcomes analysis" 97 : 781-788, 2001

12 Wachtel MS, "Human papillomavirus testing as a cytology gold standard: comparing Surinam with the Netherlands" 18 : 349-353, 2005

13 Hutchinson ML, "Homogeneous sampling accounts for the increased diagnostic accuracy using the ThinPrep processor" 215-9, amjclinpathol1994;101

14 Gay JD, "False-negative results in cervical cytology studies" 1043-6, actacytol1985;29

15 Fetherston WC, "False-negative cytology in invasive cancer of the cervix" clinicalobstetgynecol1983;26

16 Paillo JL, "Evaluation of the ThinPrep pap test in clinical practice: A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont" 42 : 203-208, 1998

17 Parkin DM, "Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990" 80 : 827-841, 1999

18 Weintraub J, "Efficacy of a liquid-based Thin layer method for cervical cancer screening in a population with a low incidence of cervical cancer" 22 : 52-59, 2000

19 Obwegeser JH, "Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? A prospective, randomized trial comparing the ThinPep Pap test with the conventional Pap test, including follow-up of HSIL cases" 45 : 709-714, 2001

20 Vassilakos P, "Direct-to-vial use of the AutoCyte PREP liquid-based reparation for cervical-vaginal specimens in three European laboratories" 43 : 65-68, 1999

21 Taylor S, "Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial" 118 : 957-962, 2006

22 Coste J, "Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening" 326 : 733-737, 2003

23 Ferenczy A, "Conventional cervical cytologic smears vs. ThinPrep smear. A paired comparison study on cervical Cytology" 40 : 1136-1142, 1996

24 Fremont-Smith M, "Comparison of the SurePathTM Liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multicenter Direct-to Vial study" 102 : 269-279, 2001

25 Lim YK, "Comparison of efficacy between MonoPrep? and Papanicolaou smear for cervical cancer screening" 47 : 109-117, 2004

26 Wilbur DC, "Clinical trials demonstrate an increased detection rate of abnormal cervical cytologic specimens" 209-14, amjclinpathol1994;101

27 Lee JR, "Clinical significance of HPV DNA test for management of patients with diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance/ low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions" 46 : 268-275, 2003

28 Park JM, "Clinical efficacy of manual liquidbased cervicovaginal cytology preparation: Comparative study with conventional Papanicolaou test" 16 : 10-17, 2005

29 Mok JE, "Clinical analysis of 1058 patients with uterine cervical cancer" 44 : 101-113, 2001

30 Ministry of health and welfare, "Annual report of the central cancer registry in Korea" 2002

31 Jang J, "A comparision of AutoCyte PREP with matched conventional smear in cervicovaginal cytology" 13 : 8-13, 2002

32 La YH, "A comparative analysis of cervical Pap smears prepared by conventional and ThinPrep method" 43 : 1450-1458, 2000