RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      숙련급 조종사와 초급 조종사와의 주의 배분 차이 분석 = Analysis of Differences in Attention Allocation Patterns between Expert and Novice Pilots

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105664731

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this study. differences in attention allocation patterns between expert and novIce pilots were investigated by a verbal protocol when pilots were engaged in a task during the instrument flight. Ten pilots including experts and novices were participated to conduct a pre-determined task(a fix-to-fix) on F-5E Cockpit Procedure Trainer Simulator. Experts show better performance as expected with more stable variations in speed. altitude. and attitude. In attention allocation patterns. novices allocated about 83% of attentional resources on the primary instruments (airspeed indicator. altitude indicator. and attitude) relating to the task of the basic flight while experts spent 57%. This difference in the availability of attentional resources allowed expert pilots to accomplish the task better than novices. In other words. training a pilot should consider a program for building up wider instrument scanning patterns to become an expert in a shorter time.
      번역하기

      In this study. differences in attention allocation patterns between expert and novIce pilots were investigated by a verbal protocol when pilots were engaged in a task during the instrument flight. Ten pilots including experts and novices were particip...

      In this study. differences in attention allocation patterns between expert and novIce pilots were investigated by a verbal protocol when pilots were engaged in a task during the instrument flight. Ten pilots including experts and novices were participated to conduct a pre-determined task(a fix-to-fix) on F-5E Cockpit Procedure Trainer Simulator. Experts show better performance as expected with more stable variations in speed. altitude. and attitude. In attention allocation patterns. novices allocated about 83% of attentional resources on the primary instruments (airspeed indicator. altitude indicator. and attitude) relating to the task of the basic flight while experts spent 57%. This difference in the availability of attentional resources allowed expert pilots to accomplish the task better than novices. In other words. training a pilot should consider a program for building up wider instrument scanning patterns to become an expert in a shorter time.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "Visual Scanning and Pilot Expertise" 68 (68): 569-579, 1997

      2 "Visual Flight Rules(VFR) Flight into Instrumental Meteorological Conditions (IMC" 2001

      3 "Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Flight into Adverse Weather" 2000

      4 "Verbal Reports as Evidence of the Process Operator's Knowledge" 5 (5): 223-238, 1999

      5 "The Use of Verbal Protocols to Understand and Design Skill -Based Tasks, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing" 8 (8): 23-39, 1998

      6 "The Relationship between High Performance and Knowledge about How to Master Cooperation Situations" 16 (16): 491-508, 2002

      7 "Resource -Allocation Strategies" 76 (76): 70-88, 1998

      8 "Procee3-D Perspective Displays for Guidance and Traffic Awareness" 1999

      9 "Junior High Students and Think Aloud Generating Information-Seeking Process Data using Concurrent Verbal Protocols" 23 (23): 107-122, 2001

      10 "Individual differences during driver secondary task performance:" 34 (34): 655-662, 2002

      1 "Visual Scanning and Pilot Expertise" 68 (68): 569-579, 1997

      2 "Visual Flight Rules(VFR) Flight into Instrumental Meteorological Conditions (IMC" 2001

      3 "Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Flight into Adverse Weather" 2000

      4 "Verbal Reports as Evidence of the Process Operator's Knowledge" 5 (5): 223-238, 1999

      5 "The Use of Verbal Protocols to Understand and Design Skill -Based Tasks, Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing" 8 (8): 23-39, 1998

      6 "The Relationship between High Performance and Knowledge about How to Master Cooperation Situations" 16 (16): 491-508, 2002

      7 "Resource -Allocation Strategies" 76 (76): 70-88, 1998

      8 "Procee3-D Perspective Displays for Guidance and Traffic Awareness" 1999

      9 "Junior High Students and Think Aloud Generating Information-Seeking Process Data using Concurrent Verbal Protocols" 23 (23): 107-122, 2001

      10 "Individual differences during driver secondary task performance:" 34 (34): 655-662, 2002

      11 "Individual Differences in Human-Computer Interaction" 1998

      12 "HumanFactors in Flight." Ashgate Publishing Company 27-56, 1993

      13 "Human Factors in Aircraft Accidents" 7 : 2002

      14 "Expert and Exceptional Performance" 273-305, 1996

      15 "Engineering psychology and human performance, 3rd Edition" Prentice Hall 69-106, 2000

      16 "Decision Making on the Flight Deck" 366 : 1020-1049, 1997

      17 "Context, Cognition, and Common Method Variance" Organization Behavior and Human Decision Pro 68 (68): 246-261, 1996

      18 "Comparison of Expert and Novice Scan Behaviors During VFR Flight," 2001

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.1 0.1 0.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.19 0.306 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼