RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    기관투자자의 경영관여 = Monitoring director’s management by the institutional investment

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100042415

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The outside director institution, a company law for ensuring company management transparency, is not functioning in its purpose. The main cause seems to be that the majority of outside directors are chosen by recommendation from controlling shareholders or managements so that an actual independence of the outside director is not established.
    A way for the institutional investor to take part in and check the election process so that the outside director independent from controlling shareholders or managements will be chosen to ensure the functionality of the outside director institution will be explored.
    The election process for an outside director, when classified by its candidate recommendation process and the election process at shareholders meeting, needs an application of the outside director labor pool in relation to recommending the outside director candidate by the institutional investor, and also needs an application of national pension that will lead and remind the necessity of the unity between the institutional investors in relation to exercising the shareholder voting right by the institutional investors.
    Traditionally, institutional investors have been reluctant to engage in company management. Recently, the expansion of the role of institutional investors and the elimination of legal restrictions on shareholder voting rights aided in establishing the basis for the institutional investors to engage more actively in company management.
    Engaging in the outside director election process can be approached in a similar light, and for this to happen ratio of share holdings needs to be expanded, for the institutional investors to maintain long term stocks investment issues expiration needs to be elongated, and ways to elongate the evaluation process of fund managers should be established.
    Moreover, proxy needs to be utilized actively in order to make up for the lacking ratio in shareholders meeting, and obligating cumulative voting, dispersing the shareholders meeting open period, and etc. are needed as countermeasures as well.
    번역하기

    The outside director institution, a company law for ensuring company management transparency, is not functioning in its purpose. The main cause seems to be that the majority of outside directors are chosen by recommendation from controlling shareholde...

    The outside director institution, a company law for ensuring company management transparency, is not functioning in its purpose. The main cause seems to be that the majority of outside directors are chosen by recommendation from controlling shareholders or managements so that an actual independence of the outside director is not established.
    A way for the institutional investor to take part in and check the election process so that the outside director independent from controlling shareholders or managements will be chosen to ensure the functionality of the outside director institution will be explored.
    The election process for an outside director, when classified by its candidate recommendation process and the election process at shareholders meeting, needs an application of the outside director labor pool in relation to recommending the outside director candidate by the institutional investor, and also needs an application of national pension that will lead and remind the necessity of the unity between the institutional investors in relation to exercising the shareholder voting right by the institutional investors.
    Traditionally, institutional investors have been reluctant to engage in company management. Recently, the expansion of the role of institutional investors and the elimination of legal restrictions on shareholder voting rights aided in establishing the basis for the institutional investors to engage more actively in company management.
    Engaging in the outside director election process can be approached in a similar light, and for this to happen ratio of share holdings needs to be expanded, for the institutional investors to maintain long term stocks investment issues expiration needs to be elongated, and ways to elongate the evaluation process of fund managers should be established.
    Moreover, proxy needs to be utilized actively in order to make up for the lacking ratio in shareholders meeting, and obligating cumulative voting, dispersing the shareholders meeting open period, and etc. are needed as countermeasures as well.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 기관투자자의 현황과 지위
    • Ⅲ. 사외이사 선임에 있어서 기관투자자의 역할
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 기관투자자의 현황과 지위
    • Ⅲ. 사외이사 선임에 있어서 기관투자자의 역할
    • Ⅳ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 원동욱, "주요국 기업지배구조의 최근 동향 및 향후과제" 한국기업법학회 26 (26): 247-284, 2012

    2 나승성, "주식회사기관 이외의 자에 의한 회사지배" 19 (19): 2001

    3 금융투자협회, "자본시장 변동성 축소를 위한 대응방안 검토" 2013

    4 안수현, "의결권행사 자문기관(Proxy Advisor Firm)에 대한 국제적인 규제움직임과 시사점" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 1-33, 2013

    5 김택주, "위임장제도에 관한 법적 고찰" 법학연구소 25 (25): 257-290, 2012

    6 장정애, "우리나라 기관투자자의 의결권 행사에 관한 소고" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 71-103, 2013

    7 김순석, "연기금 의결권행사제도의 문제점 및 개선방안" 한국기업법학회 27 (27): 285-322, 2013

    8 이제원, "상장회사에 있어서 기관투자자의 역할" 17 (17): 1998

    9 염미경, "사외이사제도와 기관투자자의 역할" 19 : 2004

    10 이효경, "사외이사의 독립성" 한국기업법학회 28 (28): 89-120, 2014

    1 원동욱, "주요국 기업지배구조의 최근 동향 및 향후과제" 한국기업법학회 26 (26): 247-284, 2012

    2 나승성, "주식회사기관 이외의 자에 의한 회사지배" 19 (19): 2001

    3 금융투자협회, "자본시장 변동성 축소를 위한 대응방안 검토" 2013

    4 안수현, "의결권행사 자문기관(Proxy Advisor Firm)에 대한 국제적인 규제움직임과 시사점" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 1-33, 2013

    5 김택주, "위임장제도에 관한 법적 고찰" 법학연구소 25 (25): 257-290, 2012

    6 장정애, "우리나라 기관투자자의 의결권 행사에 관한 소고" 한국경영법률학회 23 (23): 71-103, 2013

    7 김순석, "연기금 의결권행사제도의 문제점 및 개선방안" 한국기업법학회 27 (27): 285-322, 2013

    8 이제원, "상장회사에 있어서 기관투자자의 역할" 17 (17): 1998

    9 염미경, "사외이사제도와 기관투자자의 역할" 19 : 2004

    10 이효경, "사외이사의 독립성" 한국기업법학회 28 (28): 89-120, 2014

    11 이수정, "사외이사 및 감사의 실질적 독립성 분석(2012) -대규모기업집단소속 상장회사를 중심으로-" 경제개혁연구소 2013

    12 증권거래소, "기관투자자의 주식투자 현황 및 매매형태 분석"

    13 권기범, "기관투자자의 의결권행사에 관한 연구" 14 (14): 1995

    14 정윤모, "기관투자자의 의결권행사 활성화" 2001

    15 최문희, "기관투자자의 의결권 행사의 개선과 의결권 자문회사의 활용" 한국경제법학회 7 (7): 135-170, 2008

    16 최도성, "기관투자자의 의결권 행사가 가지는 경제적 의미에 관한 연구" (31) : 1997

    17 정광선, "기관투자자의 안정주주로서의 관계투자" 증권거래소 95 (95):

    18 강성원, "국민연금 의결권 행사의 구조적 문제점" 한국경제연구원 2011

    19 금융투자협회, "국민연금 기금운용 개선방안" 2013

    20 남유선, "개정상법 및 시행령상 기업지배구조변화에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 26 (26): 47-78, 2012

    21 鄭埈雨, "株主提案權의 行使要件과 그 問題點" 한국상사법학회 21 (21): 9-314, 2002

    22 Bernald S. Black, "The Value of Institutional Investor Monitoring : The Empirical Evidence" 39 : 897-, 1992

    23 John C. Coffee, "The SEC and the Institutional Investor : A Half-time Report" 15 : 837-, 1994

    24 Ronald J. Gilson, "The Mechanics of Market Efficiency" 70 : 549-550, 1984

    25 Edward B. Rock, "The Logic and (uncertain)significance of institutional shareholder Activiem" 79 : 445-, 1991

    26 Roberta Romano, "Public Pension Fund Activism in Corporate Governance Reconsidered" 93 : 796-, 1993

    27 Margaret M. Blair, "Ownership and Control" The Brookings Institution 1995

    28 S. Black, "Hail Britannia? : Institutional Investor Behavior under Limited Regulation" 92 : 2002-, 1994

    29 O'kelley, "Corporation and other business associations" Little Brown & Co. 1992

    30 Robert B. Clark, "Corporate Law" Little Brown & Co. 390-, 1986

    31 D. Solomon, "Coporate Law and Policy" West 1994

    32 Bernald S. Black, "Agents Watching Agents: The Promise of Institutional Investor Voice" 39 : 811-, 1992

    33 Ronald J. Gilson, "A structural approach to corporations : A Cast against Defensive Tactics in Tender Offers" 33 : 819-, 1981

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2014-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.71 0.71 0
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0 0 0 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼