RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    핵심역량 교육과정의 글로벌 규범과 로컬의 전유 = Global norms and local appropriation of the core competency curriculum

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100111201

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to illuminate the characteristics of global curriculum governance exercised by the OECD around core competencies and the ways in which central and local governments appropriate the global influences. First the impact of global governance on the curriculum can be characterized as conformity pressure or compliance with international norms and the exercise of remote control by the OECD. Second, the central government of South Korea has accepted the core competencies as global standards, seeking a sense of identity as a member among advanced countries and a sense of belonging to global society. In this process, core competency is proposed in the hope of changing the existing institutional path of education in South Korea. Third, the selected local educational authority has made use of the OECD to legitimate its own campaign to promote professionalism in the reconstruction of teachers’curriculum and to spread a learningbased pedagogical approach. However, regardless of the positive appropriation of global discourses on core competencies, central and local governments confront the problems of decoupling between global legitimacy and the domestic educational system. Recently, South Korea has been keen to use the core competency curriculum from the OECD, utilizing the external authority of global organization. However, since externalization is conveniently used to avoid internal disputes on the issues of borrowing particular policy, the overdependence on references to global organization might limit the potential to build internal legitimacy through internal curriculum deliberation. Thus, the author argues that the public space of deliberation for controversial curricular issues must become more accessible to curriculum researchers in the ways in which educators fully communicate for constructing internal legitimacy.
    번역하기

    This study aims to illuminate the characteristics of global curriculum governance exercised by the OECD around core competencies and the ways in which central and local governments appropriate the global influences. First the impact of global governan...

    This study aims to illuminate the characteristics of global curriculum governance exercised by the OECD around core competencies and the ways in which central and local governments appropriate the global influences. First the impact of global governance on the curriculum can be characterized as conformity pressure or compliance with international norms and the exercise of remote control by the OECD. Second, the central government of South Korea has accepted the core competencies as global standards, seeking a sense of identity as a member among advanced countries and a sense of belonging to global society. In this process, core competency is proposed in the hope of changing the existing institutional path of education in South Korea. Third, the selected local educational authority has made use of the OECD to legitimate its own campaign to promote professionalism in the reconstruction of teachers’curriculum and to spread a learningbased pedagogical approach. However, regardless of the positive appropriation of global discourses on core competencies, central and local governments confront the problems of decoupling between global legitimacy and the domestic educational system. Recently, South Korea has been keen to use the core competency curriculum from the OECD, utilizing the external authority of global organization. However, since externalization is conveniently used to avoid internal disputes on the issues of borrowing particular policy, the overdependence on references to global organization might limit the potential to build internal legitimacy through internal curriculum deliberation. Thus, the author argues that the public space of deliberation for controversial curricular issues must become more accessible to curriculum researchers in the ways in which educators fully communicate for constructing internal legitimacy.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 허창수, "핵심역량에 기초한 국제자원활동 준비를 위한 교육과정 탐구" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 253-280, 2013

    2 최홍원, "핵심 역량의 관점에 기반한 국어교육의 재구조화 연구" 한국국어교육학회 (97) : 171-207, 2013

    3 미래부, "창조경제의 핵심, 창의인재 핵심역량 제고를 위한 Five-Jump Up’ 전략 추진"

    4 미래부, "창조경제를 견인할 창의인재 육성 방안"

    5 경기도교육청, "창의지성교육 해설 자료"

    6 홍원표, "역량기반 교육과정의 현장 적용 방안 연구:캐나다 퀘벡의 사례를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 29 (29): 67-86, 2011

    7 박민정, "역량기반 교육과정의 특징과 비판적 쟁점 분석:내재된 가능성과 딜레마를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 27 (27): 71-94, 2009

    8 손민호, "실천적 지식의 일상적 속성에 비추어 본 역량(competence)의 의미: 지식기반사회? 사회기반지식!" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 1-25, 2006

    9 이근호, "미래사회 대비 핵심역량 함양을 위한 국가교육과정 구상" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

    10 이근호, "미래 핵심역량 계발을 위한 교과교육과정탐색. 교육과정 교수·학습 및 교육평가의 연계를 중심으로" 한국교육과정평가원 2013

    1 허창수, "핵심역량에 기초한 국제자원활동 준비를 위한 교육과정 탐구" 한국교육과정학회 31 (31): 253-280, 2013

    2 최홍원, "핵심 역량의 관점에 기반한 국어교육의 재구조화 연구" 한국국어교육학회 (97) : 171-207, 2013

    3 미래부, "창조경제의 핵심, 창의인재 핵심역량 제고를 위한 Five-Jump Up’ 전략 추진"

    4 미래부, "창조경제를 견인할 창의인재 육성 방안"

    5 경기도교육청, "창의지성교육 해설 자료"

    6 홍원표, "역량기반 교육과정의 현장 적용 방안 연구:캐나다 퀘벡의 사례를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 29 (29): 67-86, 2011

    7 박민정, "역량기반 교육과정의 특징과 비판적 쟁점 분석:내재된 가능성과 딜레마를 중심으로" 한국교육과정학회 27 (27): 71-94, 2009

    8 손민호, "실천적 지식의 일상적 속성에 비추어 본 역량(competence)의 의미: 지식기반사회? 사회기반지식!" 한국교육과정학회 24 (24): 1-25, 2006

    9 이근호, "미래사회 대비 핵심역량 함양을 위한 국가교육과정 구상" 한국교육과정평가원 2012

    10 이근호, "미래 핵심역량 계발을 위한 교과교육과정탐색. 교육과정 교수·학습 및 교육평가의 연계를 중심으로" 한국교육과정평가원 2013

    11 이광우, "미래 한국인의 핵심역량 증진을 위한 초·중등학교 교육과정 설계방안 연구" 한국교육과정평가원 2009

    12 윤현진, "미래 한국인의 핵심역량 증진을 위한 초·중등학교 교육과정 비전연구Ⅰ: 핵심역량 준거와 영역 설정을 중심으로" 한국교육과정평가원 2007

    13 이광우, "미래 한국인의 핵심역량 증진을 위한 초·중등학교 교육과정 비전연구 II: 핵심역량 영역별 하위요소 설정을 중심으로" 한국교육과정평가원 2008

    14 소경희, "뉴질랜드 교육과정 개혁 동향: 핵심역량 중심 교육과정의 실천 사례" 한국비교교육학회 20 (20): 27-50, 2010

    15 김대현, "국가·지역·학교 수준의 교육과정 거버넌스 체제 탐색" 2014

    16 곽영순, "과학과 교육과정 개정에 대비한 핵심역량 재구조화 방안" 한국지구과학회 34 (34): 368-377, 2013

    17 Meyer, J. W., "World society and the nation-state" 103 (103): 144-181, 1997

    18 Bennett, C. J., "What is policy convergence and what causes it?" 21 (21): 215-233, 1991

    19 Evans, M., "Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective" 77 (77): 361-385, 1999

    20 Steiner-Khamsi, G., "The global politics of educational borrowing and lending" Teachers College Press 2004

    21 Sellar, S., "The OECD and global governance in education" 28 (28): 710-725, 2013

    22 Bieber, T., "The OECD PISA Study as a Soft Power in Education? Lessons from Switzerland and the US" 46 (46): 101-116, 2011

    23 Ravitch, D., "Schools we can envy"

    24 Phillips, D., "Researching policy borrowing : Some methodological challenges in comparative education" 30 (30): 773-784, 2004

    25 Hulme, R., "Policy transfer and internationalisation of social policy" 4 (4): 417-425, 2005

    26 Lingard, B., "Policy as numbers : Ac/counting for educational research" 38 : 355-382, 2011

    27 Takayama, K., "OECD, 'Key competencies' and the new challenges of educational inequality" 45 (45): 67-80, 2013

    28 Appadurai, A., "Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization" University of Minnesota Press 1996

    29 Rychen, D. S., "Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society" Hogrefe & Huber Publisher 2003

    30 Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized organizations : Formal structure as myth and Ceremony" 83 (83): 340-363, 1977

    31 Enders, J., "Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state : Recent developments and challenges to governance theory" 47 : 361-382, 2004

    32 Burbules, N. C., "Globalization and education: Critical perspectives" Routledge 2000

    33 Dale, R., "Globalisation, knowledge economy and comparative education" 41 (41): 117-149, 2005

    34 Schriewer, J., "Globalisation in education: Process and discourse" 1 (1): 271-282, 2003

    35 Vidovich, L, "Global-national-local dynamics in policy processes: a case of 'quality' policy in higher education" 25 (25): 341-354, 2004

    36 Takayama, K., "Finland Has it All? Examining the Media Accentuation of ‘Finnish Education’ in Australia, Germany and South Korea" 8 (8): 307-325, 2013

    37 Rizvi, F., "Education, globalisation and social change" Oxford University Press 2006

    38 Sahlberg, P., "Education policies for raising student learning: the Finnish approach" 22 (22): 147-172, 2007

    39 Whitty, G., "Devolution and choice in education: the school, the state, and the Market" Open University Press 1998

    40 OECD, "Definition and selection of competencies: Theoretical and conceptual foundation (DeSeCo)" OECD Press 2003

    41 Rychen, D. S., "Defining and selecting key competencies" Hogrefe & Huber Publishers 2001

    42 Sung, Y-K., "Cultivating borrowed futures: the politics of neoliberal loanwords in South Korean cross-national policy borrowing" 47 (47): 523-538, 2011

    43 Teichler, U., "Comparative higher education : Potentials and limits" 32 (32): 431-465, 1996

    44 Ball, S., "Big policies/small world: An introduction to international perspectives in education policy" 34 (34): 119-130, 1998

    45 Marginson, S., "Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education:A glonacal agency heuristic" 43 : 281-309, 2002

    46 Carney, S., "Between Faith and Science : World Culture Theory and Comparative Education" 56 (56): 366-393, 2012

    47 Kuiper, W., "Balancing curriculum regulation and freedom across Europe" SLO

    48 Chen, K., "Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization" Duke University Press 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼