RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    土地所有上限制에 관한 硏究 : 宅地所有上限制의 導入과 관련하여 = (A) Study on the Maximum System of Land Property : In connection with the Maximum system of site property

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T1836868

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Major aim in our real estate policy is latched to realization of stability in the land value and to ensuirng the justice in distribution through resolving the phenomena of disproportionate ownership of the land.
    Therefore in this treaties the theoretical foundation and constitutional basis of maximum system of land property success or failure would produce an enormous impact upon finding key for solution of land problems are reviewed and the feasibility of introducing this system is probed theoretically.
    Simultaneously through the analysis of status of operations of the foregoing system in the countries which accepted the former the problems contained in "(Draft) legal proposal the maximum system of land property" have been subjected to careful analysis and the following conclusions have been drawn :
    1. Unlike other proprietary rights land is accepted with more significant social and public limits. Therefore maximum system of land property as one of real estate policy in modern state has ideological and constitutional basis, furthermore introduction of the system has sufficient justification.
    However pertaining to land problems proper approaches should be dictated by the understanding of intrinsic nature of the land and recovery of such nature rather than by implementation of systems related to land which is fated to be partial in nature.
    2. For the successful implementation of maximum system of land property correct understanding onthe essence and concept of ownership of land are prerequisite and only those systems based upon such understandings are worthy for introduction. For this reason for the introduction of maximum system of site property factors described in the following should be considered :
    a) Private property system is one of basic element of capitalism and essential ingredient of our constitutional order and it belongs to the care of right of property. Accordingly maximum system of site property should not be employed for the nationalization of most of housing sites which shall lead to the direction of categorical denial against private ownership.
    b) Among capitalistic countries only a few of them adopted maximum system of site property furthermore reportedly they are suffering with many problems in application and operation of the system. For this reason taking steps to ensure effectiveness of the system is required.
    c) For prevention of speculations on real estate and for expanded supply of housing sites implementation of maximum system of site property is insufficient. Consequently early introduction of combined land tax system, reorganization of tax system by shifting to taxes on holding land and realistic and staged actualization of standard of taxes are required.
    d) It should be reminded that success or failure of a policy is largely determined by consistency of policy, complementarity of political means, and more than anything else sense of missions by the public officials on the line of execution are most important elements.
    e) Hastiness in adopting the system alone while the posture of accepting such system is unprepared shall produce enormous side-effects which eventually lead not to reinforcement.
    번역하기

    Major aim in our real estate policy is latched to realization of stability in the land value and to ensuirng the justice in distribution through resolving the phenomena of disproportionate ownership of the land. Therefore in this treaties the theore...

    Major aim in our real estate policy is latched to realization of stability in the land value and to ensuirng the justice in distribution through resolving the phenomena of disproportionate ownership of the land.
    Therefore in this treaties the theoretical foundation and constitutional basis of maximum system of land property success or failure would produce an enormous impact upon finding key for solution of land problems are reviewed and the feasibility of introducing this system is probed theoretically.
    Simultaneously through the analysis of status of operations of the foregoing system in the countries which accepted the former the problems contained in "(Draft) legal proposal the maximum system of land property" have been subjected to careful analysis and the following conclusions have been drawn :
    1. Unlike other proprietary rights land is accepted with more significant social and public limits. Therefore maximum system of land property as one of real estate policy in modern state has ideological and constitutional basis, furthermore introduction of the system has sufficient justification.
    However pertaining to land problems proper approaches should be dictated by the understanding of intrinsic nature of the land and recovery of such nature rather than by implementation of systems related to land which is fated to be partial in nature.
    2. For the successful implementation of maximum system of land property correct understanding onthe essence and concept of ownership of land are prerequisite and only those systems based upon such understandings are worthy for introduction. For this reason for the introduction of maximum system of site property factors described in the following should be considered :
    a) Private property system is one of basic element of capitalism and essential ingredient of our constitutional order and it belongs to the care of right of property. Accordingly maximum system of site property should not be employed for the nationalization of most of housing sites which shall lead to the direction of categorical denial against private ownership.
    b) Among capitalistic countries only a few of them adopted maximum system of site property furthermore reportedly they are suffering with many problems in application and operation of the system. For this reason taking steps to ensure effectiveness of the system is required.
    c) For prevention of speculations on real estate and for expanded supply of housing sites implementation of maximum system of site property is insufficient. Consequently early introduction of combined land tax system, reorganization of tax system by shifting to taxes on holding land and realistic and staged actualization of standard of taxes are required.
    d) It should be reminded that success or failure of a policy is largely determined by consistency of policy, complementarity of political means, and more than anything else sense of missions by the public officials on the line of execution are most important elements.
    e) Hastiness in adopting the system alone while the posture of accepting such system is unprepared shall produce enormous side-effects which eventually lead not to reinforcement.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 3
    • 第3章 土地所有上限制의 理念的 根據 = 5
    • 목차
    • 第1章 序論 = 1
    • 第1節 硏究의 目的 = 1
    • 第2節 硏究의 範圍 및 方法 = 3
    • 第3章 土地所有上限制의 理念的 根據 = 5
    • 第 1 節 土地所有制度의 變遷 = 5
    • I. 槪觀 = 5
    • II. 原始社會 = 7
    • III. 古代社會 = 8
    • IV. 中世封建社會 = 12
    • V. 近代社會 = 15
    • VI. 現代社會 = 18
    • 第2節 土地公槪念의 生成과 導入 = 23
    • 第3節 土地所有上限制의 理論的 根據 = 46
    • I. 理論的 基礎 = 46
    • II. 憲法的 根據 = 46
    • 第3章 各國의 土地所有上限制 比較 = 60
    • 第1節 槪說 = 60
    • 第2節 日本 = 61
    • I. 導入背景 = 61
    • II. 制度의 根據 = 61
    • III. 制度의 內容 및 實施經過 = 62
    • 第3節 臺灣 = 64
    • I. 導入背景 = 64
    • II. 制度의 根據 = 65
    • III. 制度의 內容 및 實施經過 = 66
    • 第4節 印度 = 69
    • I. 導入背景 = 69
    • II. 制度의 根據 = 70
    • III. 制度의 內容 및 實施經過 = 70
    • 第5節 우리나라 = 73
    • I. 導入背景 = 73
    • II. 制度의 根據 = 74
    • III. 制度의 內容 및 實施經過 = 74
    • 第4章 宅地所有上限制에 관한 法律案 檢討 = 78
    • 第1節 宅地所有上限制 導入의 前提要件 = 78
    • I. 成熟要件 = 78
    • II. 節次要件 = 80
    • III. 報償要件 = 81
    • 第2節 宅地所有上限制 導入의 妥當性 檢討 = 82
    • 第3節 法律案의 主要內容 = 84
    • 第4節 法律案의 問題點 檢討 = 87
    • I. 違憲論爭 = 87
    • II. 所有上限 宅地面積의 適正性 = 88
    • III. 實施期間·方法 및 範圍 = 91
    • 第5章 結論 = 96
    • 參考文獻 = 102
    • 英文抄錄 = 108
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼