This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in th...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76472910
2006
-
360
KCI등재
학술저널
1-45(45쪽)
17
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in th...
This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in the international human rights discourse especially after Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in 1993(hereafter Declaration). The article examines related international human rights norms such as Declaration, UN Model Legislation on Domestic Violence, and Report documented at UN Commission on Human Rights on the one hand. On the other hand, it analyzes the testimonies of the domestic violence victims. Methodologically, the former provides the legal and normative ground of this work, the latter the empirical and social ground.<BR> After examination, the study reaches to the findings as follows: Firstly, domestic violence is not so much an individual deviance as social behavior based upon the family structure where the men and women, younger and older are hierarchically differently located. The ideology that it is always better keeping the family than being out of it is also critical. The domestic violence policy ought to correct family institution as well as family ideology in the society.<BR> Secondly, the current law tends to treat the domestic violence as a violence merely occurred in the domestic setting. In other words, without pinning down the unique nature of domestic violence, domestic violence in the law only designates the ‘place’ of violence. Due to the legal, economical, and emotional respects of the family, domestic violence has the nature of continuity, complexity, and invisibility.<BR> Thirdly, in relation to the second, it seems that ‘violence’ rather ‘domesticity’ has been mattered in the pre-existing statutes. Domestic violence has been almost solely regulated by the criminal codes in Korea. Other than the punishment by penal codes, there are many aspects that will be appropriately treated by the civil codes. Particularly, family law about divorce, custody, and division of property ought to accommodate domestic violence in its stipulations. Introduction of legal separation and economic support of the victim (and their family) will be the task for the future legislation of family law. It will not only have the reparative effects on victim but also, and more importantly, have the preventive effect against domestic violence.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "「매맞는 아내" 미간행 1992
2 "「가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구」" 연구보고서 1992
3 "형사법의 성편향" 박영사 2004
4 "현대사회의 성, 사랑, 에로티시즘―친밀성의 구조변동" 새물결 1996
5 "한국 가정폭력의 개념정립과 실태에 관한 연구" 1998
6 "전국 가정폭력 실태조사 보고서" 2004
7 "저는 오늘 꽃을 받았어요" 또하나의 문화 2001
8 "여성인권과 아내강간" 2000
9 "여성에 대한 폭력, 그 원인과 결과" 2000
10 "여성과 법 - 한국과 미국 법 이론 판례" 법무부 2005
1 "「매맞는 아내" 미간행 1992
2 "「가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구」" 연구보고서 1992
3 "형사법의 성편향" 박영사 2004
4 "현대사회의 성, 사랑, 에로티시즘―친밀성의 구조변동" 새물결 1996
5 "한국 가정폭력의 개념정립과 실태에 관한 연구" 1998
6 "전국 가정폭력 실태조사 보고서" 2004
7 "저는 오늘 꽃을 받았어요" 또하나의 문화 2001
8 "여성인권과 아내강간" 2000
9 "여성에 대한 폭력, 그 원인과 결과" 2000
10 "여성과 법 - 한국과 미국 법 이론 판례" 법무부 2005
11 "성폭력특별법의 정비방안: 성폭력 처벌규정에 대한 비판적 성찰 및 재구성" 2005
12 "성폭력의 의미구성과 성적 자기결정권의 딜레마" (13) : 2001
13 "사랑은 지독한, 그러나 너무나 정상적인 혼란―사랑, 결혼, 가족, 아이들의 새로운 미래를 향한 근원적 성찰" 새물결 2001
14 "가정폭력에 대한 영국가족관련법의 보호조치" 경원대학교 (3) : 1995
15 "가정폭력법의 법적 구조와 정책지향에 대한 검토" 서울대학교 법학연구소 39 (39): 1998
16 "가정폭력범죄의 형사절차상 위기개입 방안" (69) : 2002
17 "가정폭력 피해자에 의한 가해자 살해 : 그 정당화와 면책의 논리" 서울대학교 법학연구소 37 (37): 285-289, 1996
18 "“The Violence of Privacy" 1991
19 "“Patterns of Abuse"
20 "Victims and Identity of Law" 6 : 1997
21 "The Body in Pain" Oxford University press 1985
22 "Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation" Temple University press 1996
23 "Injustices in Families -Assault and Domination" Westview Press 203-224, 1995
24 "Equality Theory, Marital Rape, and the Promise of the Fourteenth Amendment" Temple University press 1996
25 "21세기 여성인권법제사" 2000
유책배우자의 이혼청구와 허용기준 - 대법원 2004. 9. 24. 선고 2004므1033 판결
Rechtsvergleichende Betrachtungen zur Vaterschaftsanfechtung durch den leiblichen Vater des Kindes
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-06-13 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law | ![]() |
| 2005-06-10 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2004-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.83 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.77 | 0.77 | 0.758 | 0.5 |