RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    가정폭력에 대한 비판적 성찰: 젠더폭력 개념을 중심으로 = Critical Examination of Domestic Violence: Based on the Notion of Gender Based Violence

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76472910

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in the international human rights discourse especially after Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in 1993(hereafter Declaration). The article examines related international human rights norms such as Declaration, UN Model Legislation on Domestic Violence, and Report documented at UN Commission on Human Rights on the one hand. On the other hand, it analyzes the testimonies of the domestic violence victims. Methodologically, the former provides the legal and normative ground of this work, the latter the empirical and social ground.<BR>  After examination, the study reaches to the findings as follows: Firstly, domestic violence is not so much an individual deviance as social behavior based upon the family structure where the men and women, younger and older are hierarchically differently located. The ideology that it is always better keeping the family than being out of it is also critical. The domestic violence policy ought to correct family institution as well as family ideology in the society.<BR>  Secondly, the current law tends to treat the domestic violence as a violence merely occurred in the domestic setting. In other words, without pinning down the unique nature of domestic violence, domestic violence in the law only designates the ‘place’ of violence. Due to the legal, economical, and emotional respects of the family, domestic violence has the nature of continuity, complexity, and invisibility.<BR>  Thirdly, in relation to the second, it seems that ‘violence’ rather ‘domesticity’ has been mattered in the pre-existing statutes. Domestic violence has been almost solely regulated by the criminal codes in Korea. Other than the punishment by penal codes, there are many aspects that will be appropriately treated by the civil codes. Particularly, family law about divorce, custody, and division of property ought to accommodate domestic violence in its stipulations. Introduction of legal separation and economic support of the victim (and their family) will be the task for the future legislation of family law. It will not only have the reparative effects on victim but also, and more importantly, have the preventive effect against domestic violence.
    번역하기

      This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in th...

      This article intends to be a critical examination of the notion of "family violence" both explicitly and implicitly employed in the law. Particularly it introduces the idea of ‘gender violence’ that has been established in the international human rights discourse especially after Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women in 1993(hereafter Declaration). The article examines related international human rights norms such as Declaration, UN Model Legislation on Domestic Violence, and Report documented at UN Commission on Human Rights on the one hand. On the other hand, it analyzes the testimonies of the domestic violence victims. Methodologically, the former provides the legal and normative ground of this work, the latter the empirical and social ground.<BR>  After examination, the study reaches to the findings as follows: Firstly, domestic violence is not so much an individual deviance as social behavior based upon the family structure where the men and women, younger and older are hierarchically differently located. The ideology that it is always better keeping the family than being out of it is also critical. The domestic violence policy ought to correct family institution as well as family ideology in the society.<BR>  Secondly, the current law tends to treat the domestic violence as a violence merely occurred in the domestic setting. In other words, without pinning down the unique nature of domestic violence, domestic violence in the law only designates the ‘place’ of violence. Due to the legal, economical, and emotional respects of the family, domestic violence has the nature of continuity, complexity, and invisibility.<BR>  Thirdly, in relation to the second, it seems that ‘violence’ rather ‘domesticity’ has been mattered in the pre-existing statutes. Domestic violence has been almost solely regulated by the criminal codes in Korea. Other than the punishment by penal codes, there are many aspects that will be appropriately treated by the civil codes. Particularly, family law about divorce, custody, and division of property ought to accommodate domestic violence in its stipulations. Introduction of legal separation and economic support of the victim (and their family) will be the task for the future legislation of family law. It will not only have the reparative effects on victim but also, and more importantly, have the preventive effect against domestic violence.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 여는 말
      Ⅱ. 가정폭력 개념의 고찰
      Ⅲ. 젠더 폭력(Gender Based Violence)
      Ⅳ. 맺음말
      《참고문헌》
      영어 초록
    • Ⅰ. 여는 말
      Ⅱ. 가정폭력 개념의 고찰
      Ⅲ. 젠더 폭력(Gender Based Violence)
      Ⅳ. 맺음말
      《참고문헌》
      영어 초록
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "「매맞는 아내" 미간행 1992

    2 "「가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구」" 연구보고서 1992

    3 "형사법의 성편향" 박영사 2004

    4 "현대사회의 성, 사랑, 에로티시즘―친밀성의 구조변동" 새물결 1996

    5 "한국 가정폭력의 개념정립과 실태에 관한 연구" 1998

    6 "전국 가정폭력 실태조사 보고서" 2004

    7 "저는 오늘 꽃을 받았어요" 또하나의 문화 2001

    8 "여성인권과 아내강간" 2000

    9 "여성에 대한 폭력, 그 원인과 결과" 2000

    10 "여성과 법 - 한국과 미국 법 이론 판례" 법무부 2005

    1 "「매맞는 아내" 미간행 1992

    2 "「가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구」" 연구보고서 1992

    3 "형사법의 성편향" 박영사 2004

    4 "현대사회의 성, 사랑, 에로티시즘―친밀성의 구조변동" 새물결 1996

    5 "한국 가정폭력의 개념정립과 실태에 관한 연구" 1998

    6 "전국 가정폭력 실태조사 보고서" 2004

    7 "저는 오늘 꽃을 받았어요" 또하나의 문화 2001

    8 "여성인권과 아내강간" 2000

    9 "여성에 대한 폭력, 그 원인과 결과" 2000

    10 "여성과 법 - 한국과 미국 법 이론 판례" 법무부 2005

    11 "성폭력특별법의 정비방안: 성폭력 처벌규정에 대한 비판적 성찰 및 재구성" 2005

    12 "성폭력의 의미구성과 성적 자기결정권의 딜레마" (13) : 2001

    13 "사랑은 지독한, 그러나 너무나 정상적인 혼란―사랑, 결혼, 가족, 아이들의 새로운 미래를 향한 근원적 성찰" 새물결 2001

    14 "가정폭력에 대한 영국가족관련법의 보호조치" 경원대학교 (3) : 1995

    15 "가정폭력법의 법적 구조와 정책지향에 대한 검토" 서울대학교 법학연구소 39 (39): 1998

    16 "가정폭력범죄의 형사절차상 위기개입 방안" (69) : 2002

    17 "가정폭력 피해자에 의한 가해자 살해 : 그 정당화와 면책의 논리" 서울대학교 법학연구소 37 (37): 285-289, 1996

    18 "“The Violence of Privacy" 1991

    19 "“Patterns of Abuse"

    20 "Victims and Identity of Law" 6 : 1997

    21 "The Body in Pain" Oxford University press 1985

    22 "Legal Images of Battered Women: Redefining the Issue of Separation" Temple University press 1996

    23 "Injustices in Families -Assault and Domination" Westview Press 203-224, 1995

    24 "Equality Theory, Marital Rape, and the Promise of the Fourteenth Amendment" Temple University press 1996

    25 "21세기 여성인권법제사" 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-06-13 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
    2005-06-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Korean Law -> Korean Journal of Family Law KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.87 0.87 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.77 0.77 0.758 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼