1990년대와 2000년대 이후 이후 한국 현대 사회에서 타투 수용의 변화에 관한 사회연결망 분석|RISS 상세보기

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study explores the changing societal perceptions of tattoos in South Korea from the 1990s through the post-2000s. By utilizing big data from January 1, 1990, to December 31, 2023, the research aims to understand the evolution of cultural and social attitudes towards tattoos over these decades. The methodology centers around text mining to extract significant keywords and employs social network analysis to map out the relationships and relevance of these terms within the societal context. In the 1990s, the analysis identifies “Cultural Change,” “Individualism,” “Social Integration,” and “Freedom” as key terms. These keywords reflect the societal and cultural shifts of the era, marked by rapid technological advancements and changes in cultural perspectives, highlighting a period of significant transformation where traditional norms began to be questioned. The 2000s show a distinct shift in perception, with “Modernity,” “Globalization,” and “Cultural Acceptance” becoming dominant. This period is characterized by increased global connectivity and technological progress, influencing the broader acceptance of tattoos as elements of individual identity and expression. The findings indicate that tattoos moved from being merely personal adornments to significant markers of personal freedom and identity, paralleling broader trends of cultural openness and diversity acceptance. The comparative analysis across the decades shows how the perception of tattoos transitioned from negative in the 1990s to more positive in the 2000s. Keywords such as “Modernity” and “Globalization” underscore a society embracing technological progress and global cultural exchanges, where tattoos symbolize personal freedom and a global cultural dialogue. This study provides insights into the socio-cultural dynamics of tattoo acceptance in South Korea, tracing the trajectory from predominantly negative perceptions to increasingly positive views. It reveals how tattoos, once seen as stigmatized, have gradually emerged as symbols of individuality and cultural openness, mirroring changing norms and the growing integration of global cultural trends into South Korean society. Overall, the research highlights a significant transformation in the social perception of tattoos, driven by shifting cultural norms, technological advancements, and globalization. These changes not only reflect evolving aesthetic preferences but also deeper societal transformations concerning personal identity, cultural expression, and acceptance. The findings offer valuable insights for academics, policymakers, and cultural practitioners interested in the evolving social landscapes.

번역하기

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Go, E. M., "The Effects of Preference for Tattoo by Age on Popularization" 2 (2): 47-62, 2021

2 김선형, "The Effects of Celebrity Tattoos on their Perception and Imitative Behavior in Women’s University" 24 (24): 904-914, 2018

3 Lee, B. C., "The Aspect and Direction of Filial Duty Education in Modern Society" 101 : 7-28, 2020

4 김가현 ; 하지수, "Tattoo Culture in Korea from the Perspective of Post-subculture" 46 (46): 63-79, 2022

5 이상훈 ; 이충혁 ; 김정수 ; 박미연 ; 정찬우 ; 이상준 ; 최응호, "Perception of Tattoos in South Korea: Analysis of Citizen Survey Data" 59 (59): 15-24, 2021

6 Lee, Y. M., "Experience in Tattooing by Age, Recognition of Celebrity (Entertainer, Celebrities, Influencer) Tattoos" 1 (1): 13-, 2020

7 백경옥 ; 박두현, "Cognition of Modern People for Tattoo and Utilities of Tattoo According to the Social and Cultural Properties" 23 (23): 73-90, 2017

8 서란숙, "Analysis of the network relationship between tattooists’ acceptance of tattoo legalization and entrepreneurial intentions" 23 (23): 231-244, 2022

9 서란숙, "Analysis of Social Phenomenon on Tattoo Using Big Data and Social Network Analysis - News texts for the last year as collated" 27 (27): 1139-1145, 2021

10 차민경, "A discourse analysis for Korean women’s leisure culture from 1960s to the present - Application of semantic network analysis" 21 (21): 197-229, 2018